ROAR: “Bakiyev’s page in Kyrgyzstan’s history should be closed”
Published: 12 October, 2010, 17:57
Edited: 13 October, 2010, 18:26
As the parties that won the parliamentary elections prepare to form a coalition, analysts doubt that the distribution of mandates reflects the real alignment of forces.










Predictably, the reform pushed through referendum resulted in a real democracy deficit. And also predictably, very few parties that passed the treshold will hold the key to power, even though they represent probably LESS then 30% of votes in this election. The other 70% went to voting places for nothing, a mere decoration to prove "free and fair" elections by OSCE. The only hope is that the few parties that made it into the power will be aware of the popular wishes and needs, and will keep that foremost on their minds in building a coalition. In reality, it stands little chance --- once power, control, money and other interests become involved. With so much diversity, the country would be infinitely better off with a two party system, where in reality winner takes a lot. And the other party at least knows whom to blame, and take it out on the incumbents the next time around. This particular "parliamentary" system is not giving any chance to the electorate, as the dozens of parties dilute the blame. This system may create an elite of interests, but it may also succumb to another revolution if this newfangled elite forgets that majority did not vote for them.