Patriarch Kirill is focusing the storm-eye of our actuality. He simply says that there is no Orthodoxy without Christianity. So much looks understandable to all. What was not said is that there is no Orthodoxy without sovereignty; otherwise no religious subjugation is possible in order to perform its basic service, but remains a mere proselytism. Today we have the historical facts: Protestantism enjoyed sovereignty; Orthodoxy was destroyed on the split moment where Tolstoy’s input was misinterpreted by anti-theistic frenzy. So we got sovereign communism without Orthodoxy and - it failed. Over and out. Catholicism was not sovereign in its contemporary history. It compensated the organization weakness by establishment of Vatican state being of the same age as Yugoslavia. But Catholicism went on manifesting inner conflicts within hostelling states and suffered the charge of harboring the entire holocaust polluted region of WW II. However the driving force today is – the status of net value of Christianity in terms of priority. It is to suggest Kirill’s incentive removing “Jerusalem” from comparing the situation, because the actuality does not relate Christianity to any excuse for the contemporary crusades or racial extermination. Christianity is Christ oriented reality practically expressed in Russia by A. Solzhenitsyn. Anyone trying to speak on behalf of Ukraine should have demonstrated the ability to merge at least two industrial enterprises. Yushchenko failed. So how he can make religious merger, which is of incomparable size to “simple” technical loops? Ukraine should find the experienced person and the same stays for the “elite quick-baptized” leaders of the whole East Europe.