&host=rt.com&uri=/politics/russia-terrorism-accident-blast/comments/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
Analyst and officials suspect "the Caucasus trace" behind the explosions
Published: 29 March, 2010, 13:17
Edited: 31 March, 2010, 07:57
Some of them say, the blasts may be a payback after a series of attacks by the FSB, which have killed a number of terrorist leaders.
I saw the interview on CrossTalk and the British analyst kept referring to "separatists" as if they were just trying to obtain their independence. Not everybody in the west believes that anymore. Maybe in the first Chechen war, when the republic actually won its de-facto independence, we saw them as "freedom fighters". But when the fighters were not content with that and decided to use Chechnya as a base to "spread the revolution" - and especially after Beslan - then they lost credibility. For any so-called expert to refer to them as "separatists" after all this, just means that expert is stuck in a time loop and still thinks it is 1991.
My deepest condolence to all victims and all those injurred in the Moscow attacks. In this hard moment let us not forget that UK has long been endorsing the Chechen anti-Russian terrorist leaders. I am not saying that Britons are directly involved in the two blasts, but the way they (UK) behave as to these terrorists surely doesn't help in reducing their ability to commit crimes against innocent Russian civilians.