Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

MPs urge Nazi rehabilitation ban after nationwide scandal

Published time: January 31, 2014 10:25
Edited time: January 31, 2014 11:28
Irina Yarovaya (RIA Novosti / Anton Denisov)

Irina Yarovaya (RIA Novosti / Anton Denisov)

United Russia, the parliamentary majority party, is urging preventative measures against the possible revival of Nazism and militant nationalism after a controversial TV poll that split the community.

Despite the fact that Russia suffered the heaviest casualties in the Second World War, it has not yet introduced a law against those who attempt to justify Nazism, said the head of the Duma Committee for Security, Irina Yarovaya.

She noted that similar laws exist in other countries, such as Germany, Austria and Belgium for a long time already. She urged fellow members of the United Russia party to prepare and pass the bill as fast as possible.

The politician also noted that many recent events can be seen as proof that the Nazi rehabilitation ban is necessary. These are attempts to resurrect the nationalist visions and movements, Yarovaya said, noting that the future bill must include preventative measures.

Deputy Speaker of the State Duma Sergey Zheleznyak told Izvestia daily that United Russia has already started to prepare the bill proposing a new article in the Criminal Code. According to the bill, denial of Nazi crimes and glorification of Nazi regimes should be punished with heavy fines or up to three years in prison. A similar offence committed by public officials or through the mass media should be punished by up to five years behind bars.

Russian legislators have previously prepared and discussed such bills, but they were rejected by government experts for two reasons – most of the crucial terms used in the documents lacked clear legal definition and many points of the bill duplicate existing legal norms.

At present Russia qualifies public propaganda of Nazi ideas and demonstration of Nazi symbols as extremism – a criminal offence punishable by up to five years in prison. The Justice Ministry also maintains a list of banned extremist literature that includes, for example, Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’.

Zheleznyak also told reporters that the new work over the bill was prompted by the intense public reaction caused by the recent media scandal.

Earlier this week, as Russia was celebrating the 70th anniversary of the lifting of the Nazi blockade of Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), the Dozhd (Rain) TV Channel ran a poll in which it asked the audience if Leningrad should have been surrendered in order to save people’s lives.

This caused almost immediate outrage. Politicians, journalists and members of the public accused the Dozhd team of disrespecting the memory of the war victims, and demanded an apology. St. Petersburg prosecutors said they planned a probe into how the poll was created, and at least one veterans’ group threatened to sue the channel for moral damages.

In addition, many people pointed out that documents exist which prove that Nazis planned to completely exterminate the population of Leningrad and raise the city to the ground and this made the poll not only offensive, but also pointless.

As the outrage spread, Dozhd removed the poll from its website and published an apology, however its directors refused to fire the responsible persons, saying that in their view posing questions was not a crime for a reporter. The channel’s chief editor and general director also accused United Russia and the authorities of “political baiting” and started a fundraising campaign among the audience to prevent the channel from closure.

Russian consumer rights agency Rospotrebnadzor sent a letter to Dozhd calling on it to pay more attention to ethical side of its work, but said it would not issue it an official warning (three official warnings can lead to the revocation of the mass media license).

St. Petersburg prosecutors told the press on Friday that although their probe was still in progress it was already clear that the channel cannot and will not be closed.

Several Russian cable providers took Dozhd off their networks in protest. The channel accused its business partners of political pressure, but chose not to take the case to court. Instead Dozhd called on its viewers to boycott the providers.

The Presidential Council for Human Rights asked the Prosecutor General’s office to probe the situation on Friday, but the prosecutors did not immediately report their reaction.

Comments (81)

 

Derek Maher 02.04.2014 12:32

Irina, Should take another look at those countries who have passed laws similar to what she is proposing.
They passed them because their populations were all for National Socialism in the past.
The old Soviet Union did not have a mass following or support for National Socialism apart from maybe Western Ukraine?
A few street gangs play acting as NAZI,s can be dealt with under normal laws if they are violent.
No need for total social engineering.

 

pj 17.03.2014 14:44

I dont see the necessity for Russians to follow the National-Socialist brand of Nationalism. Putin's brand of Nationalism (Putin=Marine Le Pen really) is good enough and is suited for the Russian reality.

Pu tin and his team are not going to destroy Russia by importing millions of hyper-ethnocentric, ethnic egoist, tribalist, anti-white blacks, browns, turkic, Muslims, etc.

 

Tyler 09.02.2014 17:43

You wan't to know who controls a nation, just look at who you cannot question. Here in Canada we cannot even question Israeli crimes against Palestine without the threat of going to jail. So it becomes a slippery slope. Hitler's greatest crime surely was the signing of the Haavara Transfer agreement, allowing German Jews to displace and genocide the Palestinians. You need to be careful about Neo-Nazi movements, as they are often run by supremacists, be it White, or Jew or otherwise, used to incite civil war and discredit true revisionist history. There are better ways to conquer them than limiting free speech.

View all comments (81)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us