Study: War on terror weakened Obama's support
Published: 18 September, 2009, 21:36
Edited: 15 March, 2010, 16:02
TAGS: Election, Military, Scandal, Politics, Terrorism, Mass media
A study in the U.S. has shown Barack Obama's media image is on the decline. According to research by two American universities, the President's standing has seen a 16 percent decline.
“In his first 100 days, about 59 percent of his coverage was positive. The majority of the stories about the President were actually good. Now in his second 100 days, it is below 43 percent†– says Nikki Schwab, a reporter from the U.S. News and World Report magazine.
In the US, the media tends to focus on domestic issues, notes Schwab. However, it's not his domestic policies that caused the decline in approval ratings, but foreign policy decisions.
18.09.2009, 20:49
4 comments
Rasmussen: Russia and NATO could integrate their missile-defense systemsNATO is calling for a joint missile defense project with Moscow. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO’s new Secretary General, discussed the initiative in Brussels during an exclusive interview with RT. |
18.09.2009, 23:38
1 comment
“Russia-Japan: towards reaching a compromise”It would be optimal to develop Russian-Japanese relations and search for mutually acceptable solutions for a peace agreement, said Andrey Nesterenko, Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, at a regular media briefing. |
Obama is dangerous, because he no more leads the country but the military Apparatus does.
Criminally insane drug addicts in America rule, unfortunately. These people are POLY addicted which means they ingest more than one drug and therefore, the controllers of politicians - THE "HANDLERS" - have a fairly easy task in puppeteer manufacturing. Until the poly-addicted criminally insane have been taken into a center where they can be assessed for the brain damage that has been inflicted by and through the poisonous systems named as "medical," "academic," "agriculture," "water," etc., with no rules or regulations regarding being human .... ... well, the obvious is that those who called and call themselves the ELITE of the U.S. or LEADERS, have been outed by the global community for what these miscreants are, in reality: insane. Why in heaven (Condi used the celestial metaphor) would anyone believe in the possibility of human beings in America who call themselves the "government" to be other than exactly as their actions prove as NATO dark lord wannabes, the tongues wag and wag never ending lies. War on drugs, war on terror, war on human beings who choose to breathe a breath of life without paying the families of antiquity for whatever it is they dream up as a brand to force into their Obamas and other puppets, to sell as though 21st Century civilized human intelligence is continuing in the "think tanks" of ignorance.
Henry Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide by Joseph Brewda Dec. 8, 1995 On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture. The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.” want to know more then follow the link http://www.schillerinstitute.org/food_for_peace/kiss_nssm_jb_1995.html