“A lot of interesting truth has come out”
Published: 29 January, 2010, 15:45
Edited: 09 February, 2010, 17:15
UK, London : Demonstrators protest outside the QE2 centre in central London, on January 29, 2010, as former British Prime Minister Tony Blair prepares to give evidence to the Iraq War Inquiry. (AFP Photo / Shaun Curry)
(22.0Mb) embed videoTAGS: Conflict, Military, Scandal, UK, Iraq
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair is answering questions at a public inquiry into the 2003 Iraq War. It is investigating the lead up to the conflict and Blair's justification for helping America invade Iraq.
John Laughland, director of studies at the Institute of Democracy and Cooperation in Paris, told RT that Blair has begun to admit that regime change was indeed the goal of the war – which he specifically denied at the time.
“Tony Blair more or less admitted that the basic goal of the war was regime change. Now this is exactly what all his enemies have always attacked him for,” John Laughland said. “And yet we’ve seen him today beginning to admit that in fact there was no distinction between the weapons of mass destruction issue and regime change – a distinction which he has done his best to uphold in the run up to the war.”
He has also added that Tony Blair appears to have been lying on many things.
“He specifically said only a few days before the war was launched that Saddam Hussein could remain in power if only he agreed to disarm, and on that as on many other things, Tony Blair was clearly lying,” John Laughland said.
Anti-war British MP Jeremy Corbyn, who pushed for Blair’s enquiry, wasn’t satisfied with his responses.
“I saw the soldiers’ families during a brake for lunch, and they were very angry with the sort of self-confidence and self-denial of Tony Blair. So far they are not satisfied or happy about this,” Corbyn told RT.
On the contrary, foreign editor of The Times Richard Beeston believes that Blair did a good job at the hearing.
“He looked nervous at first – being out of practice: being a Prime Minister of Britain you have to make comments once a week, which keeps you sharper. He was rattled a couple of times, but by and large it was a very professional performance of the type you would expect from him,” Beeston told RT
.
ROAR: “Brainstorm for Russia’s personnel reserve”The forum of the two personnel reserves – one of the Russian president and the other of the ruling United Russia party – should propose ways of the modernization while discussing hot topics the country is facing. |
Ukrainian minister loses same job twice in two daysA court in Kiev has suspended Thursday’s appointment of Yuri Lutsenko as the acting interior minister. Just a day before, he was sacked from his position as Interior Minister. |
Truth is in the eye of the beholder. What is truth for a Frenchman may not be truth to aa Englishman.












This is for Truth's post above dated 2nd February. I have been wondering for a long time now how is it that people all over the world are so much 'mesmerized by this "truth" factor? why? are they chasing sort of truth? I feel the reason lies in its 'solvency' and it's manifested self-evidence. It is the only thing if you could call it such to stand firm and strong and unsupported and manly. from raaj joshi