Will UN action on Gaza “war crimes” derail peace process?
Published: 16 October, 2009, 19:28
Edited: 18 October, 2009, 11:35
Jabalia : Palestinians live in the ruins of the home they lost during the 22-day Israeli offensive "Operation Cast Lead", in Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip on February 4, 2009 (AFP Photo / Mahmud Hams)
TAGS: Middle East, Gaza Stories, Robert Bridge
Despite a diplomatic blitz by Israel to block passage of the Goldstone report, which accuses Israel and Palestinians of war crimes in the Gaza War, the UN on Friday voted to back the recommendations.
The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) passed the resolution 25-6, as the United States and five European countries voted against.
The report demands reliable inquiries by Israel and Hamas into charges of war crimes and possible against humanity during Operation Cast Lead, the 22-day conflict that ended in a ceasefire in January yet continues to arouse passionate global scrutiny.
The report now moves to the UN General Assembly and the Security Council where the Israelis and Palestinians will be given six months to investigate the war crime charges. In the event of non-compliance, both sides risk an international war-crimes tribunal by the International Criminal Court in the Hague to prosecute militants.
Human rights groups say that more than 1,400 Gazans were killed in the conflict, but Israel officials put the number at 1,166. Thirteen Israelis were killed in the conflict, which Israel said was an act of self defense against rocket launches from Gaza into Israeli territory.
What next for the peace process?
At the beginning of the month, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu warned the UN that endorsement of the Goldstone report would “strike a fatal blow to the peace process… because Israel will no longer be able to take additional steps and take risks for peace if its right to self-defense is denied.”
Israel also accuses the Palestinians of employing “civilian shields” to cover their attacks, which works to propagate “anti-Israel propaganda sentiment” in the media.
Netanyahu said accepting the report would “strike a severe blow to the war against terrorism since it will afford total legitimization to terrorists who fire upon civilians and who hide behind civilians.”
(Incidentally, the Israeli president’s stern words may have been responsible for PA President Mahmoud Abbas voting for a UN deferral on the issue. But news of the retreat did not go down well on the Palestinian street, which erupted in protests and demands for Abbas's resignation. The public outcry forced the Palestinian government to throw their “full support” behind the discussions).
Others, however, argue that the Israeli military used “disproportionate force” during the conflict.
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who paid a visit to Gaza in June, told reporters he had to “hold back tears” while viewing the destruction.
Visiting the American School in Gaza, severely damaged during Israel’s military offensive, Carter said “it’s very distressing to me,” explaining that the facility had been “deliberately destroyed by bombs from F-16s made in my country and delivered to the Israelis.”
What next for U.S.-Israeli relations?
Although Israel and Washington remain strong allies, the relationship has noticeably chilled since the arrival of Barack Obama.
In May, Netanyahu paid a visit to the White House where he and Obama attempted to close the circle on the Middle East tangle.
The U.S. President, echoing past administrations, stressed the need for a “two-state solution” to the Palestinian crisis, as well as a halt to settlement construction in the West Bank.
The government of Benjamin Netanyahu has all but excluded the possibility of an autonomous Palestinian state. While the hawkish Israeli President yielded to American pressure to support the creation of a Palestinian state, his conditions – that it must be demilitarized and recognize Israel as a Jewish state – may be asking for too much.
Now, with international pressure in the form of a possible war crimes tribunal looming for both Israel and Palestine, it will be interesting to see what course the road map for peace takes.
Beyond the pale of war
One reason for Israel's opposition to the Goldstone report is that it touches upon subjects not directly related to the Gaza conflict.
It "strongly condemns" actions taken by Israel that place limitations on Palestinians' access to their property and religious sites "on the basis of national origin, religion, sex, age or any other discriminatory ground."
It further condemns "Israeli violations of human rights in Occupied East Jerusalem, particularly the confiscation of lands and properties, the demolishing of houses and private properties, the construction and expansion of settlements, the continuous construction of the separation wall, changing the demographic and geographic character of East Jerusalem, the restrictions on the freedom of movement of the Palestinian citizens of East Jerusalem, as well as the continuous digging and excavation works in and around Al-Aqsa mosque and its vicinity."
Although this shopping list of grievances are not immediately connected to the question of war crimes in the Gaza conflict, they are a source of extreme antagonism between the two sides that demand attention.
Now it seems the UN wants to see serious action taken on these hot-button issues so that a desperately needed solution to the Middle East crisis can finally become a reality.
16.10.2009, 17:13
1 comment
Russian parliamentary protest lingers into second weekThe Wednesday walkout of three Russian parliamentary factions waned seriously by the end of the week, with two of three parties deciding to return to their seats on Friday. |
"A milestone in the comprehensive strategic dialogue"One of the major results of Hillary Clinton’s visit is the approval of the Russian-American Presidential Commission, said Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrey Nesterenko. |
@armen08: What kind of genocide and self-inflicted holocaust are you talking about? The current Israeli policies have nothing to do with the expansionist ones of the early '80s, and genocide has never been an Israeli policy--the Jews have already drunk enough of that cup to never want to touch it again. The current Israeli government is in favor of a two-state solution, and is willing to make extensive concessions. Right now the Palestinian side is the one holding out and hardening demands. The only ones we should denounce wholeheartedly are the terrorists, who make the process of building a secure peace settlement harder for everyone with their attacks on innocent civilians.
This reminds me of the international reaction to the Russian intervention in South Ossetia. Both Gaza and the 2008 South Ossetia war were defensive actions whose facts and origins were almost immediately lost among international media, to be replaced by stories of false atrocities and disproportionate force. I don't see why Russia doesn't support Israel in this. Israel's current government isn't only into counterterrorism, it also wants to build a situation in which everyone's security is more certain and where there are no reasons for further terrorism to occur--the exact same goals as Russia! Both countries have relatively progressive foreign policies, it would be easy for them to shed their history of troubled relations between 1967 and 1991 and start cooperating in the area of security. Even if we're talking in terms of bloc politics, it would make sense for Russia to become more friendly with Israel because their relations with the United States are cooled down significantly thanks to Obama.












@Roberto: Israel has lost all claim to have been a victim of genocide. No matter how loud you yell, no matter how often Israeli criminals blame the Palestinians for the ongoing genocide in Palestine, history and facts cannot be changed. Go on, keep repeating Israeli lying points at infinitum. You will fool nobody. But you have no other choice. You have lost your freedom of thought, just as Israel has lost its moral integrity. No lies will help you, or Israel, to escape from this trap.