VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   US playing Internet monopoly   Comments  
MORE ON THE STORY
RIA Novosti / Aleksey Nikolsky 31.01, 18:23 7 comments

Putin’s Technological Industrialization

Vladimir Putin has outlined his economic strategy in a recently published article which essentially focuses on technological industrialization. Political scientist Igor Panarin believes the policy objective fits into Putin’s overall New Ideology.

National flags of Eurasian Union 30.01, 20:44 6 comments

Eurasian Union a survival option for Europe

After causing political disturbances in Greece and Italy, the aftershock of the global financial crisis has impacted on other nations within the EU. Analyst Igor Panarin believes a proposed Eurasian Union to be the only option for helping Europe.

RIA Novosti / Aleksey Druzhinin 25.01, 18:00 11 comments

US-Russia relations once elections are over

US foreign policy veteran Henry Kissinger visited Moscow and met with Vladimir Putin on January 20th. Political analyst Igor Panarin believes this meeting marked the launch of a new dialogue on the future shape of US-Russia relations.

Capitol Building in Washington, DC with the Senate side of the building on the right (AFP Photo) 19.01, 18:25 4 comments

Cold War relic lingers on

On January 18, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov revisited the issue of the notorious Jackson-Vanik amendment. Writer and political scientist Igor Panarin says Russia is right to demand that the US end the anachronistic, discriminatory practice.

Only by playing an active role in developing the principles of a new world order will Russia secure a decent place in the world , Russian political scientist Igor Panarin believes 17.01, 14:41 38 comments

Putin’s new ideology: Developing Russian civilization

Presidential candidate Vladimir Putin has outlined his election agenda in a newspaper article published on 16 January 2012. Writer and political analyst Igor Panarin believes Putin’s new ideology as president is already apparent.

Satirical mural of Statue of Liberty on the wall of the former US Embassy in Tehran 14.01, 02:04 39 comments

US military operation against Iran would be a grave mistake

The Iran controversy is heating up. Writer and political analyst Igor Panarin believes the US should heed the reasoning of Russia, China and Turkey and refrain from going to war with Iran.

MSgt Michael Gregory, senior operations controller, works at the Air Force Space Command Network Operations & Security Center at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Colorado July 20, 2010. (Reuters / Rick Wilking) 11.01, 18:33 3 comments

Supremacy in cyberspace: Obama's 'Star Wars'?

US President Obama delivered a public address in the Pentagon on 5 January this year introducing the “defense strategic review.” Writer and political analyst Igor Panarin believes Washington’s new military doctrine will focus on cyberspace supremacy.

AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev 30.12.2011, 15:40 11 comments

December 2011: Information War against Russia

Moscow’ opposition rally of December 24th marked a new stage in the information warfare against Russia. Political analyst Igor Panarin believes the society’s dissatisfaction is being manipulated through the media to undermine Russia’s statehood.

Reuters / Stefano Rellandini 21.12.2011, 19:19 17 comments

Russo-German alliance a salvation for Europe?

The European crisis is deepening. Writer and political scientist Igor Panarin believes the best way to rescue Europe and secure its unity is by forging a Russo-German alliance.

Michael McFaul (Reuters / Vladimir Pirogov) 20.12.2011, 14:30 7 comments

Michael McFaul and Russia’s Presidential Election

Michael McFaul was appointed US Ambassador to Russia on 17 December 2011. Writer and political scientist Igor Panarin believes the new ambassador is likely to try to influence Russia’s upcoming presidential election.

US playing Internet monopoly

Published: 03 February, 2012, 12:00


US playing Internet Monopoly

The US is seeking to control the Internet, which is an instrumental of its foreign policy. Writer and political scientist Igor Panarin believes Syria and Russia have been picked as a testing ground for America’s media intervention doctrine.

 
18 COMMENTS
Radostin February 03, 2012, 12:26 quote
+29

Why does Russia not develope a Russian net? This should be independet og www but usually be connected in times of peace. Europe might follow in building its own net. Don't be so lazy! The evil is quite hungry these days.

Eurasian February 03, 2012, 13:20 quote
+18

Establishing their hegemony is to be seen on every level, thus in constant breaching and violations …NOBODY has a monopoly over it. Is why is called INTERNET!

But with their famous Orwellian mentality they always find ways to go around international rules and regumations. No wonder the occurrence of the new internet Acts ACTA, PIPA, SOPA.

Russia is currently in a development of a new operating system which will be double faster than Microsoft Windows.

I agree with you Radostin, Russia should follow suit with China - which had made significant achievements in shielding and protecting herself from outside penetration.

BARNABAS February 03, 2012, 16:18 quote
+16

For americans it is quite normal.
They will behave  fascistics and  to criticize  everybody  around the  world and give " Democracy  lesson " .

Mainly they have  many own intellectually  restricts citizens, whose understand  them.

It is valid , as people  such  government.

I can get into China February 03, 2012, 19:27 quote
-5

so I guarantee I could bypass Russia or any other system. 

John (unregistered) February 03, 2012, 20:26 quote
+13

The US will NEVER give up control of the core of the Internet infrastructure and technologies (the IP address space, DNS, global fiber optics networks, etc).   
Other nations (mainly Russia and China), should once and for all stop being so stupid and, instead of just joining (with some protections), the information and propaganda network of the enemy (their enemy and the enemy of all Humanity),  they should set up their own Internet.   
It's not an impossible task, in fact, its not even that hard or expensive. Its just a mater of having the political vision and courage to do it.    
In reality, the way that the "American" Internet works is actually outdated. This is a decades old system which was not conceived to have the dimension and serve the requirements it does today.    
If the Russian and Chinese (and anyone else that joins in), conceive an Internet architecture, from new, with the knowledge base that exists today, that new Internet will easily surpass the old one.    
Its just a matter of doing it. If it gets done, people will come and it will rapidly outweigh the "CIA's" Internet. Just China alone would amount to 400 million cybernauts. It took the "CIA's" Internet 10 years to get to that size.

The US's new systems are far February 03, 2012, 20:37 quote
-6

from outdated.  They are just expensive.

Henok February 03, 2012, 22:21 quote
-13

God Bless America.

Rodolfo February 04, 2012, 00:21 quote
-4

For the most part Russian technology has lagged behind Western technology. What they couldn't invent themselves, they copied from the West. But where Russians do excel is in theoretical mathematics and physics, sports, and the classical arts.

Eurasian February 04, 2012, 00:48 quote
+6

Rodolfo wrote in #8

For the most part Russian technology has lagged behind Western technology. What they couldn't invent themselves, they copied from the West. But where Russians do excel is in theoretical mathematics and physics, sports, and the classical arts.

***************

You are right, but don’t forget Russia was prevented for long to come into the game except certain fields they [the west] couldn’t control… and everything they did was about profits - as is how capitalism works; Hollywood, MacDonald’s, Coca-Cola, etc, and the internet as well.

The cold-war is over, and the capitalism loses the competition. I bet they curse Gorbachev now ;)

And for the best part nobody can compete, yet, with Russia in the space race …which actually is the true indicator of technological advancement.

Is that why the Phobos is in the Ocean? February 04, 2012, 04:55 quote
-4

Just kidding.

brightlight February 04, 2012, 09:04 quote
0

i request the end of pre sale sold profile an filter as the network is no made the same as been made to sell an when some have broken law of elder an are proven no correct end the manner of such crime been made done an sold as by choice only dose a network an computer work pre sale to provider is a form of block same as bandwith is a lie to networks some have learn skill an no been corrected for world best guard of life other some have sold what is not need or been schooled what is good an say lies of what is good end the joke of force provided add in to isp is all the world needs with no search helpers , WHAT A JOKE THE WORK OF OTHERS WITH NO EVEN FILTER SEX AN DRUG IMAGES GOOD BY TO A FEW NAMES WHOM ARE NOT THE OS AS BUY AN ISP AN COMPUTER NEEDS NO SEARCH PROVIDER BY WORLD ELDER LAWS RULES ARE IN POWER ADDRESS AN MONEY

9ke9 February 04, 2012, 12:31 quote
0

Sadly in my opinion the view of Prof Igor Panarin

seem to misunderstand the principal of the internet altogether, here are some points that I’d like to make:

1. the US does not "administer" the internet from US soil nor can they shut it down, at best they can punch a hole in it disabling themselves.(which sadly i think they figured out)
2. A Federation wide (and further to most other nations) "interconnection" could be up and running in a matter of days if not hours, in the event that the US would be stupid enough to "nuke" their own "intranet" (which just means the hosting servers of US sites, really.)
3. the fact that some protesters organized on Facebook is a pretty weak argument when one looks at the effects that say RT and the Ron Paul campaign have had , all an offshoot of multidimensional information flow.
4. the good Prof has mixed up the principals of cause and effect , I’m sure there is a complex sounding socioeconomic fallacy related to it but I really couldn't be bothered looking it up to sound smart, so instead I’ll just say:
5. Just because down trodden individuals in places like Egypt and other places rise up and they use a form of information to educate themselves and then consequently they ; get angry; riot; and overthrow their government , that doesn't mean that DARPA designed it , in fact if one does a psychological cross section of the different "Revolutions" one can easily see that even in a place like Libya , although the hijacked campaign was a "success" it was at an increasingly large psychological "cost" as the information flows.

6. The US and the “West” are generally viewed as War nations very similar to Nazis , this is a pretty widespread view if one was to undertake a true survey of the whole world with a cross section of demographics , so if that fallacy stands I can say that the Internet was designed by DARPA to undermine “Western” credibility which I can certainly say it absolutely has done, except to complicate things further it WAS NOT the internet that undermined their credibility it was themselves (by killing lots of people and civilians)  , the internet just means people know about it and thus can make and form an educated opinion.

that is my opinion.

9ke9 February 04, 2012, 12:43 quote
+1

So in Summary:

The world hopes the Federation does not inhibit the "internet" in any way and furthermore ensures that it functions (at least locally) in the event of an attempted breakdown of the infrastructure in parts in or outside if the Federation.

I support the calls for the Federation the review it's action plan to ensure that a viable wireless and fixed network exists inside the Federation even in time that general DNS may go down, from most outside sites.

With the focus on Wireless,  the future of the net is obviously Wireless,
If a Russian company developed an Ad-Hoc wireless device with and independent OS , that weaved it's own web though other connected devices , it would both be completely independent and a boon for wireless success , and a very profitable company, all in one.

:D let the fixed line guys buy into it, (as they would see it as a large threat)

Jonathan February 04, 2012, 16:31 quote
+2

@ brightlight- run on sentence much?

Vladimir Berry February 04, 2012, 21:28 quote
+4

We are working on our own internet..Solely Russian and filth free..Very educative and clean fun..

Embarrassed (undignified) February 05, 2012, 04:47 quote
+2

Is that why the Phobos is in the Ocean? wrote in #10

Just kidding.

You just got me in trouble!  I burst out laughing when I read this, and now everybody is looking at me??  Please contain yourself and be more polite next time, okay?

marduk February 05, 2012, 16:21 quote
+1

Certainly  people  like  englishman  gary  mackinnon,  and  other  recent  hackers  into  the  US  Military  installations,  would  feel  this  american-takeover  of  the  internet  rather  childish!  surely  the  american-security  covert  groups  DONT  think  they  can  control  us  by  such  interference?  They  cannot  get  their  act  together  over  medium  hackers  so  this  proposed  takeover  is  farcical!  Besides,  Tis  not  just  humans  whom  browse  and  study  sites  on  the Web,  Certain  species  also  have  a  form  of  PC!

Dragan (unregistered) February 05, 2012, 19:14 quote
+6

What I can not understand is why Russian government, and in that effect other governments, do not use the same technique in attacking USA.  For example, why Russian government does not use internet to advocate freedom of oppressed  Latino minority of USA.  They are 60 million strong, and yet there is no republic or autonomous region of their own in USA.  I am sure that Latino people of USA would LOVE to have their own republic within USA, with their own parliament and so on ( like in any other free and normal  country of the world ).  I am sure that if Russian government starts using internet as tool to reach to Latino population of USA, and gives them support in that respect in UN, regime of USA would never, ever, try to meddle in Russian internal affairs again.
Why are not they doing that ???????  

POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image