The US is seeking to control the Internet, which is an instrumental of its foreign policy. Writer and political scientist Igor Panarin believes Syria and Russia have been picked as a testing ground for America’s media intervention doctrine.
Comments (18)
Sort by:
highest ratingoldest firstnewest first
Dragan (unregistered)05.02.2012 15:14
What I can not understand is why Russian government, and in that effect other governments, do not use the same technique& nbsp;in attacki ng USA. For example, why Russian government does not use internet to advocate&nbs p;freedom of oppressed&nb sp; Latino minority of USA. They are 60 million strong, and yet there is no republic or autonomous&n bsp;region of their own in USA. I am sure that Latino people of USA would LOVE to have their own republic within USA, with their own parliament& nbsp;and so on ( like in any other free and normal country of the world ). I am sure that if Russian government starts using internet as tool to reach to Latino populati on of USA, and gives them support in that respect in UN, regime of USA would never, ever, try to meddle in Russian internal affairs again. Why are not they doing that ???????
Certainly people like englishman&nbs p; gary mackinnon, and other recent hackers into the US Military installations, would feel this american-takeover&nb sp; of the internet rather childish! surely the american-security&nb sp; covert groups DONT think they can control us by such interference? They cannot get their act together over medium hackers so this proposed takeover is farcical! Besides, Tis not just humans whom browse and study sites on the Web, Certain species also have a form of PC!
Is that why the Phobos is in the Ocean? wrote in #10
Just kidding.
You just got me in trouble! I burst out laughing when I read this, and now everybody is looking at me?? Please contain yourself and be more polite next time, okay?
The world hopes the Federation does not inhibit the "internet" in any way and furthermore ensures that it functions (at least locally) in the event of an attempted breakdown of the infrastructure in parts in or outside if the Federation.
I support the calls for the Federation the review it's action plan to ensure that a viable wireless and fixed network exists inside the Federation even in time that general DNS may go down, from most outside sites.
With the focus on Wireless, the future of the net is obviously Wireless, If a Russian company developed an Ad-Hoc wireless device with and independent OS , that weaved it's own web though other connected devices , it would both be completely independent and a boon for wireless success , and a very profitable company, all in one.
:D let the fixed line guys buy into it, (as they would see it as a large threat)
seem to misunderstand the principal of the internet altogether, here are some points that I’d like to make:
1. the US does not "administer" the internet from US soil nor can they shut it down, at best they can punch a hole in it disabling themselves.(which sadly i think they figured out) 2. A Federation wide (and further to most other nations) "interconnection" could be up and running in a matter of days if not hours, in the event that the US would be stupid enough to "nuke" their own "intranet" (which just means the hosting servers of US sites, really.) 3. the fact that some protesters organized on Facebook is a pretty weak argument when one looks at the effects that say RT and the Ron Paul campaign have had , all an offshoot of multidimensional information flow. 4. the good Prof has mixed up the principals of cause and effect , I’m sure there is a complex sounding socioeconomic fallacy related to it but I really couldn't be bothered looking it up to sound smart, so instead I’ll just say: 5. Just because down trodden individuals in places like Egypt and other places rise up and they use a form of information to educate themselves and then consequently they ; get angry; riot; and overthrow their government , that doesn't mean that DARPA designed it , in fact if one does a psychological cross section of the different "Revolutions" one can easily see that even in a place like Libya , although the hijacked campaign was a "success" it was at an increasingly large psychological "cost" as the information flows.
6. The US and the “West” are generally viewed as War nations very similar to Nazis , this is a pretty widespread view if one was to undertake a true survey of the whole world with a cross section of demographics , so if that fallacy stands I can say that the Internet was designed by DARPA to undermine “Western” credibility which I can certainly say it absolutely has done, except to complicate things further it WAS NOT the internet that undermined their credibility it was themselves (by killing lots of people and civilians) , the internet just means people know about it and thus can make and form an educated opinion.
i request the end of pre sale sold profile an filter as the network is no made the same as been made to sell an when some have broken law of elder an are proven no correct end the manner of such crime been made done an sold as by choice only dose a network an computer work pre sale to provider is a form of block same as bandwith is a lie to networks some have learn skill an no been corrected for world best guard of life other some have sold what is not need or been schooled what is good an say lies of what is good end the joke of force provided add in to isp is all the world needs with no search helpers , WHAT A JOKE THE WORK OF OTHERS WITH NO EVEN FILTER SEX AN DRUG IMAGES GOOD BY TO A FEW NAMES WHOM ARE NOT THE OS AS BUY AN ISP AN COMPUTER NEEDS NO SEARCH PROVIDER BY WORLD ELDER LAWS RULES ARE IN POWER ADDRESS AN MONEY
Rodolfo wrote in #8
For the most part Russian technology has lagged behind Western technology. What they couldn't invent themselves, they copied from the West. But where Russians do excel is in theoretical mathematics and physics, sports, and the classical arts.
******* ********
You are right, but don’t forget Russia was prevented for long to come into the game except certain fields they [the west] couldn’t control… and everything they did was about profits - as is how capitalism works; Hollywood, MacDonald’s, Coca-Cola, etc, and the internet as well.
The cold-war is over, and the capitalism loses the competition. I bet they curse Gorbachev now ;)
And for the best part nobody can compete, yet, with Russia in the space race …which actually is the true indicator of technological advancement.
For the most part Russian technology has lagged behind Western technology. What they couldn't invent themselves, they copied from the West. But where Russians do excel is in theoretical mathematics and physics, sports, and the classical arts.
The US will NEVER give up control  ;of the core of the Internet infrastructure and technologies (the IP address space, DNS, global fiber optics networks, etc). Othe r nations (mainly Russia and China), should once and for all stop being  ;so stupid and, instead of just joining (with some protections), the information and propaganda network of the enemy (their enemy and the enemy of all Humanity), they should set up their own Internet. It's not an impossible task, in fact, its not even that hard or expensive. Its just a mater of having the political vision and courage to do it. In reality, the way that the "American" Internet works is actually outdated. This is a decades old system which was not conceived to have the dimension and serve the requirements it does today. If the Russian and Chinese (and anyone else&nbs p;that joins in), conceive an Internet architecture, from new, with the knowledge base that exists today, that new Internet will easily surpass the old one. Its just a matter of doing it. If it gets done, people will come and it will rapidly outweigh the "CIA's" Interne t. Just China alone would amount to 400 million cyberna uts. It took the "CIA's" Internet 10 years to get to that size.
For americans it is quite normal. They will behave fascistics and to criticize everybody around the world and give " Democracy lesson " .
Mainly they have many own intellectually restricts citizens, whose understand them.
It is valid , as people such government.
Establishing their hegemony is to be seen on every level, thus in constant breaching and violations …NOBODY has a monopoly over it. Is why is called INTERNET!
But with their famous Orwellian mentality they always find ways to go around international rules and regumations. No wonder the occurrence of the new internet Acts ACTA, PIPA, SOPA.
Russia is currently in a development of a new operating system which will be double faster than Microsoft Windows.
I agree with you Radostin, Russia should follow suit with China - which had made significant achievements in shielding and protecting herself from outside penetration.
Why does Russia not develope a Russian net? This should be independet og www but usually be connected in times of peace. Europe might follow in building its own net. Don't be so lazy! The evil is quite hungry these days.
Comments (18) Sort by: highest rating oldest first newest first
Dragan (unregistered) 05.02.2012 15:14
Undo
marduk 05.02.2012 12:21
Undo
Embarrassed (undignified) 05.02.2012 00:47
Undo
Vladimir Berry 04.02.2012 17:28
Undo
Jonathan 04.02.2012 12:31
Undo
9ke9 04.02.2012 08:43
Undo
9ke9 04.02.2012 08:31
Undo
brightlight 04.02.2012 05:04
Undo
Is that why the Phobos is in the Ocean? 04.02.2012 00:55
Undo
Eurasian 03.02.2012 20:48
Undo
Rodolfo 03.02.2012 20:21
Undo
Henok 03.02.2012 18:21
Undo
The US's new systems are far 03.02.2012 16:37
Undo
John (unregistered) 03.02.2012 16:26
Undo
I can get into China 03.02.2012 15:27
Undo
BARNABAS 03.02.2012 12:18
Undo
Eurasian 03.02.2012 09:20
Undo
Radostin 03.02.2012 08:26
Undo
Add comment
By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules
Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.