&host=rt.com&uri=/programs/alyona-show/banks-foreclosure-fraud-alyona/comments/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
breakingnews
Spencer Platt / Getty Images / AFP
We'll take a look at the new foreclosure fraud settlement between 49 states and the five biggest banks. Is this really a good deal for Americans or an easy out for Wall Street? Then, we’ll have the latest on the Pentagon’s smear campaigns against whistle blowers. Also, is it time for a popular national vote? We’ll ask if the Electoral College needs to go. And then don’t miss happy hour.
February, 2012
10 5:00, 22:00
Those who succeed the best in marginalizing faith are the faithful themselves. Rick santorum is a good example.
Dear Alyona, The title for this article is wrong or you have made the assumption that laws passed by liberal congresses and signed by liberal presidents have nothing to do with the actions of the banks.
The fraud that you complain about was created by the "Community Reinvestment Act of 1977" which wa passed by a liberal Democrat congress and signed by the worst president before Obama, Jimmy Carter. Liberal Democrats then followed up by forcing banks to make loans that the banks knew were not likely to be repaid. This caused the eventual collapse of the real Estate financial market and our current problems.
You have also berated those who have found that the prison compound at Guantanimo was actually necessary. This is an attack upon those who changed their minds. It is a prisonn for prisoners of war, who were captured while thay were actively fighting against us. The persons held there are no ordinary criminals. They are soldiers of a foreign power. The fact that the power is the claimed religion of Islam, which has as one of its precepts the total take over of the world and which does not respect the actual existence of sovereign countries does not change the fact that these are actually soldiers.
In alignmaent with this error of logic, you also claim that this country has no right to defend istself against an American who by his action in leaving the United States and joining an organization that is waging war against us. You claim that this former citizen, who has done that which every country recognizes as an action which denies the right to citizenship in the country, must still be granted the rights of a citizen to a Trial in the U. S. under U. S. rules of trial. This is wrong. any person who joins any organization waging war against his own country has by that ction renounced his citizenship.
Jenny did a great job on the CPAC story. Good job.
Alyona, it would be good for you to really research the reality of female military service. Sometimes, even if the woman doesn't want it, guys want to play hero. There is usually competition and romance, but a small minority are lesbian. The guys who don't get the female attention have less care for what happens to the guys who do. There may even be some guys who want the others hurt badly, if you know what I mean. You need to educate yourself on this issue.