breakingnews
A Libyan National Transitional Council (NTC) fighter looks through binoculars at an outpost in the outskirts of Bani Walid on September 27, 2011. (AFP Photo/Karim Sahib)
Is there a case for humanitarian interventions? What can justify them? Or is it just a cover for preserving the order the West is comfortable with? We’ve seen Kosovo and Iraq, yet the momentum has not gone away. With Libya, humanitarian interventions are back in fashion. Nebojsa Malic, Isa Blumi and Ian Williams CrossTalking on September 27.
September, 2011
26 23:31
I think there was some interesting things being said here BUT
1. Kosovo is THE historical motherland of the orthodox Serbian Church and they fought dearly for it over many centuries .
The central issue here is .... does a influx of Muslim from Albania and around suddenly make Kosovo a Muslim Nation ??
So if Muslims outnumber (over centuries) does it make it their Land ?
Kosovo is a thorn in the Vatican's eye due to the Serbian Orthodox faith not bowing down to the Vatican .
Serbs where butchered by
- The Turks ( created by the Vatican see their Symbol sun and half crescent )
- Croatians ( 400 000 butchered Serbs )
-Se Germans from Wikipedia as with the Greeks " Franz Böhme,
responded to Serb attacks on German forces by ordering reprisal attacks
in which 100 Serbs would be killed for each German killed and 50 Serbs
killed for each wounded German
- The Vatican's Sun-worshiping Jesuit Freemason Scum . Have now successfully replaced every descent person in charge with a NATO Muppet (NATO , UN , EU ), looted the country with the biggest criminals running the show .
2. Gaddafi was just in the process of creating an African agreement whereas they where going to be paid in Renminbi or Brazilian Real ... he probably figured that Rupee would be better and that was just too much .... No problem bombing a 747 and butchering / torching people for decades . When in exchange he did it for the MI6 or CIA .
Moral of the story ... if you believe what you see your lost ... try and understand it and you confused ... read up on 6000 year old religion and how it rules our world and it makes more sense .... or read the Bible !
The accusation by IAN WILLIAMS that Russia and China played a "double-game" over the LIBYAN UN resolution to aid the "rebels" was an insult to those two countries. GERMANY also declined direct military intervention and did not join the BRITAIN and FRANCE. NATO is now a gun for hire. GERMANY listened to the Russians who seem to have a much clearer idea of geo-politics and the limits of "might is right" doctrine; as with IRAQ now in a state of civil war and tribal insurrection. By some estimates over 20,000 people have died in the Libyan campaign to liberate the country. PETER LAVELLE gave us a rare opportunity to ask the central question.... was this war legal. IAN WILLIAMS response referred to the UN limited resolution which specifically did not include direct military intervention using special forces. Wars are now the default setting in the West.