‘Federer only player able to beat Djokovic’

Published time: February 05, 2013 16:47
Edited time: February 05, 2013 20:47
Roger Federer (AFP Photo / Manan Vatsyayana)
Download video (29.81 MB)
Embed

Both male and female world number ones successfully defended their titles and top rankings at the Australian Open in January. RT talked with Russia's first female Grand Slam winner, 2004 Roland Garros champion Anastasia Myskina, to help explain why.

The men's event saw all four top seeds reach the semi-finals before world number one Novak Djokovic claimed an Open era record of three Australian Open titles in a row and four in the 25-year-old's glittering career.

“Djokovic likes to play in Australia. He feels comfortable in every respect.Besides, he didn't face Roger Federer, and this might have made a difference. I think Roger is currently the only one who can beat Novak. He knows him very well and his mental game is stronger. Then, in the final against Andy Murray, Djokovic was fitter, he moved better, he was faster,” Myskina said.

Victoria Azarenka's triumph was the second straight time the Belorussian had won at Melbourne Park and her second Grand Slam title since turning pro in 2003.

“Azarenka knew she needed to win the Australian Open to remain world number one. And that's what she was really bothered about. She wanted to prove she deserved top spot in the rankings. So she gave her all in Melbourne. I think she produced one of her best ever performances,” believes Myskina.

According to Anastasia Myskina, one of Russia's most tactically adept players, the key to Azarenka's success is simple – the intelligent use of her own strength.

“Azarenka is powerful and very patient. She knows the best moment to turn her power on. She plays wide using different angles, all the space of the court. That's what gives her an edge,” Myskina explains.

It was the USA's Sloane Stephens, who produced the biggest shock of the tournament. The 19-year old stunned compatriot Serena Williams in the quarter-finals, and was only stopped by the eventual champion in the last four.

“Stephens moves well and hits hard. And she can read her opponents. But she's not good at offensive play, yet. She needs to create more opportunities. If she improves this aspect, she'll be very hard to beat,” Myskina admitted.

“As for Serena, she claims most of her wins by means of power and strength. But when she's not at her full capacity or injured, like against Stephens, she can be outplayed, because she loses her main asset – power.”

Meanwhile, the other semi-final saw another favorite bow out as Maria Sharapova was thrashed by former French Open champion Na Li of China.

“There were some psychological factors that affected Sharapova's performance – her main opponents produced very solid tennis. At the same time, Na Li had some old scores to settle and was extremely motivated. I think Maria played good tennis but not good enough to win this particular Grand Slam,” Myskina said.

Comments (6)

Jeff Sawyer (unregistered) 08.02.2013 16:33

"The last 2 times Novak & Roger met, Novak hammered Roger in straight sets (mind you, straight sets)."

Do you know anything about tennis? Or statistics? Their second to last meeting was in Cincinnati, where Federer beat Djokovic in straight sets (including a 6-0 bagel first set). Furthermore, saying Novak "hammered" Roger in their most recent match is absolutely ridiculous. It was a close tiebreak in the first and Roger held two set points in the second. It was an incredibly close, well-fought match that could easily have gone the other way.

Not to mention their third to last match was Federer's four-set win over Djokovic at Wimbledon. You sir are a troll or an idiot, and probably both.

0

Undo

Alexsgd (unregistered) 08.02.2013 06:46

Oh really? Nonsense. Maybe you forgot that this AO not wimby. The last 2 times Novak & Roger met, Novak hammered Roger in straight sets (mind you, straight sets). So the only guy who can beat now Novak in AO was actually himself (which he a got control of).

0

Undo

Sporty 06.02.2013 11:51

Point well made. Entirely agree. When Djokovic was in full steam in 2011, it was Federer that stopped him. Interestingly, a 29-years old Federer stopped a 23-something in his best form on a surface that supposedly required more strength and stamina than hardcourt and grass!!

Feder er is capable is defeating anyone who is not named Nadal on a given day. Federer has the game to defeat Nadal but does not have necessary mental edge. Djokovic escaped Wawrinka by providence.

B etween leading players, the balance would wing from time to time. That does not mean that one will have an upper hand forever. Somehow tennis fans and media are not capable of getting it in their head and seem to remember only the most recent matches in their head. To give an example, Federer beat Andy three times in a row in slams but Andy has finally figured a way out. Andy will have less reasons to fear Federer now, but Federer will obviously do his homework and come back to beat again.

Roger is too experienced and too cool headed not to come back again. Wait and see...

0

Undo

View all comments (6)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us