Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


‘Fracking is good for us’: Cameron seeks to steer EU away from Russian gas

Published time: March 26, 2014 14:09
Edited time: June 27, 2014 08:33
The IGas Energy exploratory gas drilling site is seen at at Barton Moss near Manchester in northern England January 13, 2014 (Reuters / Phil Noble)

The IGas Energy exploratory gas drilling site is seen at at Barton Moss near Manchester in northern England January 13, 2014 (Reuters / Phil Noble)

UK Prime Minister David Cameron has used the Hague talks on the Crimea crisis to stress that fracking is “good” for his country, in an apparent attempt to use fears about EU dependence on Russian gas to promote his government’s pro-fracking agenda.

The British Prime Minister placed the popular blame with “a lack of understanding” of the process, believing that once the wells are up and running, the “uncertainties and concerns” people had would go away and one would hear “more directly from local people about what [hydraulic fracturing] has meant for their communities.”

The need for fracking is greater than ever, Cameron said at the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague, saying that Russian behavior in Ukraine didn’t go as planned and a search for alternate sources needed to be at the top of Europe’s energy agenda, Reuters reports.

"Some countries are almost 100 percent reliant on Russian gas, so I think it is something of a wake-up call," Cameron told reporters Tuesday, following a decision made the previous day at a G7 meeting. To reduce dependence on Russia, he argued, the EU would need to tap the vast shale gas reserves found in southeastern Europe, as well as in Poland and the UK.

Although this is a strategy for the whole of Europe, not all its members are equal buyers of Russian gas. The UK purchases only a small amount; but the EU as a whole accounts for about one-third of Russia’s exports, 40 percent of which pass through Ukraine. There has even been talk of importing gas from the US, as well as using the continent’s collective purchasing power to pressure Russia into better deals.

Meanwhile, Britain has been buying from Russia directly, after a 2012 deal that promised direct purchasing in October 2014. The deal is still alive, despite UK’s calls for a move away from dependence on Russia, whose exports provide up to 15 percent of the country’s gas needs. UK’s own gas production is falling by 7 percent annually, as the country looks for alternate sources.

The Ukrainian crisis, however, had no notable effect on gas imports to Europe itself.

The practice of fracking has received a widely negative reputation both inside and outside the UK. The United States has seen mass demonstrations by victims of its chemical fallout, accompanied by studies showing spikes in hereditary conditions found in newborn children of families living anywhere near a fracking well, as well as reports that fracking causes earthquakes and destruction. The evidence against it is overwhelming.

But Cameron was defiant: “When I look at a lot of the concerns expressed… I think there’s a really good answer to all the questions. So I’m confident we’ll win the argument,” he told reporters.

"So I think it's a good opportunity. Energy independence, using all these different sources of energy, should be a tier-one political issue from now on, rather than tier five," Cameron said.

This address promptly received criticism from environmental groups such as Greenpeace, who accused the PM of cynicism and an attempt to use the Ukrainian crisis as a springboard for fracking. They further add that the practice wouldn’t be anywhere near the scale Cameron wants for another 10 years or so. The first to suffer wouldn’t be Russian imports, but Britain’s own alternate sources of gas.

Comments (36)


dancebackthesea 28.03.2014 12:19

Fracking is being pushed by a fossil fuel industry that refuses to release its monopolization of energy markets for its own corporate profit. Big oil has simply bought off the politicians and made them their ever greedy lap dogs. And, though we have many technologies that in combination could replace this dirty, world warming, and toxic energy - the fossil fuel industry does its best to suppress these competitors.

There have been over 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to areas of gas drilling as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water.


Jake B 28.03.2014 11:27

I think there is a American who is something to do with fracking and when they wanted to frack near his perfect house he complained and said it would pollute the water supplies.

T his is what i see all our posh and well educated/military Politicans say when fracking comes near them, but of course... it won't hit london for centuries it would be sussex/kent/surrey and places like liverpool/manchester /newcastle/birmingha m. Places where majority of politicans don't have houses in those areas and if they do its rented.


Anthony Kitchen 28.03.2014 11:20

Why do these people above make such negative unless comments about a serious matter. They will be the people who will complain the most when they are without any gas supply.

View all comments (36)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us