Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


​34,600 kids aged 10-17 in UK convicted of crime in 2013 – report

Published time: June 08, 2014 12:31
Edited time: June 27, 2014 07:54
Reuters / Cathal McNaughton

Reuters / Cathal McNaughton

At least 34,600 children in England and Wales aged between 10 and 17 were convicted of a crime during 2013, according to figures obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Over 120 of them were still at primary school.

Out of the 120 primary schoolkids, 40 had been convicted of a crime before, the Telegraph reported, citing Justice Ministry data obtained under freedom of information laws.

Also in UK education, ‘Trojan Horse’ schools accused of discriminating against non-Muslims

In total, more than 22,500 of all the children were repeat troublemakers. At least 5,000 children aged 16 or 17 had been charged with offences at least five times in the past. Over 210 teens in the age group had been arrested more than 20 times, and 29 of them had previously committed about 30 crimes.

What can push the teens to crime is losing interest in school due to failures in basic skills such as reading, writing and arithmetic (“the three Rs”), said Chris McGovern, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, which calls for a return to traditional education values. McGovern added that a total of 129,000 pupils finished primary education without a proper understanding of “the three Rs.”

“It is inexcusable that children are leaving primary schools without being able to read, write and add up, and this is disastrous for their secondary school careers which can lead to absenteeism and criminal activities,” he said. “We are letting children down in our schools.”

The data shows a decrease in the figures, however. In 2010, the number of children under 18 convicted of crimes in England and Wales was more than 67,000.

Jeremy Wright, the justice minister, said the authorities are “doubling the amount of education” in the institutions for young criminals.

“We are reforming the youth estate with the introduction of secure colleges. These new establishments will tackle the root cause of offending by giving people the skills and self-discipline to gain employment and training upon release and turn their lives around,” he told the Telegraph.

In April, the reoffending figures revealed that around 23,000 of 66,000 juvenile offenders between July 2011 and June 2012 reoffended. The "proven re-offending" rate among young people under 18 years old was 35.3 percent, higher than among adults (25.1 percent).

Comments (22)


Blue 09.06.2014 17:46

Peter Anderson 09.06.2014 10:48

Social-Scienc e is subversive and is truly no more than cultural-Marxism.


You have VERY strange ideas. Have you ever looked at the wikipedia entry for social science, or even gone through one of the university courses available on line?

There is one on political philosophy from Yale which covers it -- within the first minutes of the first lecture the professor says political philosophy is one of the oldest of the social sciences.

Y ou really should learn some basics before you go ranting on these things.


Peter Anderson 09.06.2014 11:00

The people behind this know what they are doing!

The Rockefellars are the biggest spenders in social-science, JZ has shown is affiliation with this group.
The diamond JZ throws up is a sign used by far-left radicals long before JZ. Miley Cyrus twerking on stage dressed with a peadobear outfit.

The y attack traditional moral values, they promote luciferianism, Rules for radicals is dedicated to Lucifer.

A man can not be controlled but an animal with basic desires can.

Health y Families, Communities, Individuals, Nations are all enemy's of the New World Order.


Peter Anderson 09.06.2014 10:48

Social-Science is subversive and is truly no more than cultural-Marxism.

When was the last time you heard a social-scientist talk about the benefit of the traditional-Family, traditional-morals, traditional-societal norms.

We see they promote the idea of Abortion, Gender neutral children, 26 different gender types, Radical Feminism, Gay rights, single parents.

They seem to promote and support every alternative identity and ideology. Why would this science fail to study the benefits of a traditional family, the most common type, but all they do is criticise it and undermine it.

View all comments (22)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us