Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Revealed: UK govt intercepted Google, Facebook and Twitter comms

Published time: June 17, 2014 13:11
Edited time: June 27, 2014 07:49
Satellite dishes are seen at GCHQ's outpost at Bude, close to where trans-Atlantic fibre-optic cables come ashore in Cornwall, southwest England (Reuters / Kieran Doherty)

Satellite dishes are seen at GCHQ's outpost at Bude, close to where trans-Atlantic fibre-optic cables come ashore in Cornwall, southwest England (Reuters / Kieran Doherty)

British spy agencies hacked messages exchanged over Google, Facebook and Twitter by changing the definition of comms on the platforms, a Privacy International report reveals.

Vodafone dances around GCHQ in 40,000-word spying confession

The report is based on a UK government document obtained through a pro-privacy lawsuit. It reveals that UK authorities consider any contact between people in the UK via foreign social media or search engines as “external communication” and thus interceptable.

“Internal” UK communication is better protected than “external” and can be intercepted only in cases where authorities suspect illegal activity.

Classifying communications as “external” allows Britain’s digital snoops to search, read, listen and look through them. The only restriction is using keyword searches such as a British person or residence.

Privacy International claim that “by defining the use of ‘platforms’ such as Facebook, Twitter and Google as ‘external communications’, British residents are being deprived of the essential safeguards that would otherwise be applied to their communications - simply because they are using services that are based outside the UK.”

GCHQ chief to step down by year’s end following Snowden leaks

The UK’s digital spy hub, GCHQ, responsible for providing signals intelligence and information assurance to the British government and armed forces, defended its practices.

“…All of GCHQ.’s work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorized, necessary and proportionate,” the agency said in a statement, “GCHQ has a longstanding policy that we do not comment on intelligence matters.”

Reuters / Kieran Doherty

Neither Facebook nor Twitter commented but Google responded “We provide user data to governments only in accordance with the law. Our legal team reviews each and every request, and frequently pushes back when requests are overly broad or don’t follow the correct process.”

Eric King, Deputy Director of Privacy International pointed to GCHQ’s slight of hand, “Intelligence agencies cannot be considered accountable to Parliament and to the public they serve when their actions are obfuscated through secret interpretations of byzantine laws.”

“The suggestion that violations of the right to privacy are meaningless if the violator subsequently forgets about it not only offends the fundamental, inalienable nature of human rights, but patronises the British people, who will not accept such a meagre excuse for the loss of their civil liberties.”

In 2013 Privacy International challenged the UK govt at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) over mass surveillance. The lawsuit was followed by Edward Snowden’s revelations that GCHQ and the NSA had massive online spying and comms intercept powers under PRISM and Tempora.

Amnesty International also issued a claim in the IPT against British security services In December 2013, claiming their comms were intercepted by UK spy services.

“As a global organization working on many sensitive issues that would be of particular interest to security services in the US and UK, we are deeply troubled by the prospect that the communications of our staff may have been intercepted,” said Michael Bochenek, Director of Law and Policy at Amnesty International.

Comments (17)


Karla 14.07.2014 21:40

Prytyn 18.06.2014 07:03

Dea d right. All roads lead to London and her banks. The mouse that roared. How people can still wave little flags while these psychopaths continue to symbioticly leech off them is a triumph of their lying propaganda & media strangle hold.They are responsible for almost every major problem the world has seen or will.




far far 18.06.2014 11:12

Agnes Maria 17.06.2014 17:25

e Government itself does not respect the Constitution and, in so doing, does not respect the Citizens.


The declaration of independence tell clear reasons for demanding independence:
1. unlawful searches of places/things(emails ,skype,phone location data).
2. Immigration hurdles created to punish free speech,tear apart American families(now done as part of gang stalking mission).
3. Soldiers in front of houses(cameras, undercover spies interviewing targets about war on terror).
It ends with appeal to supreme judge to reward them for their good intentions.


Prytyn 18.06.2014 07:20

So long as these psychopaths can keep either Russia or Germany compromised the global superstate will be a certainty. Russia had Georgian Jew Stalin during WWII so Russia was then compromised & Germany fought to stop the London Zionist banks. But Putin is not Stalin. He is a Mason, which is worrying as masonry was railroaded for one purpose. But if England and her proxies are stupid enough to keep poking the Bear with a stick, & Germany can throw off NATO & Merkel the hand puppet and unite with Russia the British & Jew criminals that stole our sacred Island will be finished once and for all.

View all comments (17)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us