Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Anonymous attacking creators of indefinite detention bill

Published time: December 15, 2011 17:20
Edited time: December 16, 2011 20:35
An Occupy DC protester wearing a Guy Fawkes mask stands in the middle of the intersection of 15th and K Streets in Washington, DC December 7, 2011 during a "Take Back The Capitol" rally and march. More than a thousand demonstrators converged on K Street effectively shutting the street down to local traffic (Topshots /AFP Photo / Karen Bleier)

With President Obama read to sign away the freedoms of Americans by inking his name to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, opponents are already going after the lawmakers that made the legislation possible.

The act, abbreviated as NDAA FY2012, managed to make its way through Congress with overwhelming support in recent days, despite legislation that allows for Americans to be detained indefinitely and tortured by authorities for the mere suspicion of committing “a belligerent act." The Obama administration originally decreed that they would veto the bill, only for the White House to announce a change of heart on Wednesday this week.

With the passing of the act almost certain at this point, hackers aligned to the massive collective Anonymous are taking a stab at staking out the politicians that helped put the bill in the president’s hands.

On Wednesday, Internet hacktivists gathered on the Web to find a way to take on the lawmakers, who have allowed for this detrimental legislation to make it all the way to the Oval Office desk. Upon discussion of routes to take to show their opposition to the overwhelming number of politicians who voted in favor of NDAA, Anonymous members agreed to begin with Senator Robert J Portman, a Republican lawmaker from the state of Ohio.

By Thursday morning, an Anonymous operative released personal information pertaining to the lawmaker, and revealed that not only was Sen. Portman among the politicians to vote “aye” on the legislation, but it has also been revealed that the senator had good reason to do so.

According to a OpenCongress.org, Sen. Portman received $272,853 from special interest groups that have shown support for NDAA.

“Robert J. Portman, we plan to make an example of you,” writes an Anonymous operative. The hacktivist has also released personal data including the senator’s home address, phone number and social networking accounts in an attempt to further an infiltration from the Internet to show the opposition to the bill that colossally impacts the constitutional rights of Americans.

According to the information posted by the operative, the nearly $300,000 in special interest monies lobbied at Portman could have helped him purchase around $1.7 million in real estate in Ohio.

The next lawmaker to receive anywhere near as much as Sen. Portman is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada and third-ranked official in Congress, who pulled in more than $100,000 less than his Ohio counterpart with $172,635.

Among the supporters of NDAA are California-based manufacturer Surefire, L.L.C., who won a $23 million contract from the Department of Defense three months ago. Also contributing to the cause (and the lawmakers who voted ‘yes’) are Honeywell (who secured a $93 million deal with the Pentagon last May and a $24 million contract this year) and Bluewater Defense, a longtime DoD-ally that produces, among other garments, fire resistant combat uniforms.

When the military storms down your door for suspicion of “belligerent” acts, you can thank Bluewater and Senator Portman for the lovely flame-proof attire the soldiers will be donned in as they haul you off to Gitmo.

Comments (39)

greg cessna 04.01.2012 07:10

If anonymous is so capable how come they dont know about the mass homebuilt computers (so not to be on record) financed by inside and outside corruption placed under places like public storage 'units' or the computer chips smuggled into the unites states on the tags of oriental blankets during coordinated attacks from inside and outside (inside rigging for a very long time)
the internet goes down then they come up and they have internet and the people dont.  Think that might be tactical sopa wants to slip that bye you-Explosives put into molds to look like ordinary landscaping rocks w coved wires and magnetics even in the rivers think maybe americans need to de-rig the backwoods.  message from the grave.

0

Undo

Iris 27.12.2011 03:44

Michelle (unregistered) wrote in #1
Here's the problem. This is normally a routine bill that passes every year providing funding for the military. This year someone tacked on the ridiculous amendment that would have allowed for indefinite detention. That amendment, however, has been struck down. So yes, the bill is in front of Obama. It was always going to be. But the amendment containing the scary implications is no longer part of it. We can all stop freaking out now.
Thank you Michelle. The volume of sheer, unadulterated nonsense zipping around the internet about the NDAA boggles the mind. However, the attention to this is a good thing. It is an important subject that warrants a healthy debate and discussion. Unfortunately, much of the discussion about NDAA has been the intellectual equivalent of the “death panel” objections to the health care bill. All this hyperbolic rhetoric and fear mongering about our Constitutional rights being taken away and this country becoming a police state is something I'd expect the ignorant tea party folks to believe, not the supposedly smart, well-informed individuals to fall for it without doing real research on the subject.  
And like the Tea Party, no matter what proof you present to them on the subject, you can count on them to find some ridiculous reason not to believe it.

0

Undo

James (unregistered) 26.12.2011 04:14

To Anonymous. Your rants have at times been amusing, at times spot on, at times strange. You seem to be a ship without a rudder, no hand guiding you. You make statements and fail to follow through. Is it possible you are working for the ones you rant against, thus making the general populace ignore others due to your failures?If yes, disappear.If not, get focused and follow through. stop the grandstanding and act.A concerted hack against certain accounts of parasites is in order, move the funds to decent charities, bankrupt the "elite" and you will have accomplished something worthwhile...The rest of us just have to fight to hold on to what we have and stand against the abuses our governments pile on us

+1

Undo

View all comments (39)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us