California wants to ban death penalty

Published time: October 26, 2012 20:43
Edited time: October 27, 2012 00:44
A guard at San Quentin prison checking doors of cells housing death row inmates inside San Quentin prison.(Reuters / Clay Mclachlan)

Californians are increasingly calling for an end to the death penalty, with proponents of a repeal claiming that it could save the state hundreds of millions of dollars.

Nearly half of all registered California voters are in favor of Proposition 34, the End the Death Penalty Initiative – a number that is continuously on the rise. A poll conducted by USC Dornsife and the Los Angeles Times shows that the gap between supporters and opponents is closing and now stands at three percentage points. In September, this gap was a 13-point difference, with 38 percent opposing the death penalty and 51 percent supporting it.

“There is no question there has been a sharp shift,” Dan Schnur, head of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at USC, told the LA Times.

Those in favor of repealing the death penalty claim that the system, which allows for appeals that can go on for decades, cost hundreds of millions of dollars that can be saved if murderers are simply given life sentences instead. A 2011 report found that since reinstating the death penalty in 1978, the state of California spent about $4 billion on a system that executed no more than 13 death row inmates. There are currently 726 inmates on death row in California. Due to complications with the method of lethal injection, none have been executed in the past six years.

Many of these condemned inmates will thus languish on death row for decades, only to die of natural causes while still waiting for their cases to be resolved,” states the report, which was conducted by Judge Arthur Alarcon and law professor Paula Mitchell.

The Guardian reports that this year, California’s death row will cost $184 million, even though no executions will take place.

The high cost and inefficiency of the death penalty has caused many to call for an end to the death penalty in an attempt to save money. The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates that the state could save $100 million a year, and eventually $130 million, from abolishing capital punishment. This extra money would be given to local law enforcement agencies to handle homicide and rape cases.

“California’s death penalty is simply a fiscal disaster that coddles criminals, enriches lawyers, and hurts victims,” Ron Briggs, El Dorado County Supervisors, wrote in a blog post.

But death row inmates generally do not support Proposition 34, since the measure would eliminate funding for lawyers and investigators that could prove their innocence.

“Many of them say, ‘I’d rather gamble and have the death penalty dangling there but also be able to fight to right a wrong,’” attorney Robert Bryan told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Due to complications with a lethal injection method, it has been six years since the state executed a prisoner, causing inmates to have confidence that they won’t be put to death. California houses one quarter of all US prisoners on death row. By keeping the system in place, millions will continue to be spent on expensive appeals and lawyers charging to keep inmates from getting on the list.

Comments (5)

Marcus (unregistered) 28.10.2012 10:38

Nothing confusing about the numbers. The cost of the average inmate is $50,000 a year. A death row inmate is $178,000 year. If the average age of a inmate on death row is 30 with the chance of he or she living until 70 years you and I both know that the cost exceeds well past $1,541,835,000. Let's tell the entire truth not half truths. 

0

Undo

Anonoymous (unregistered) 28.10.2012 08:40

More reason to leave California, if anytghing else.  We live in the dark ages, where criminals have more right to life then the innocent they victimized.  Death to criminals!  Your wasting air!

0

Undo

Chris Bernstien (unregistered) 27.10.2012 22:17

Prop. 34 will kill innocent people:

Those on death row murdered at least 1,279 people, including 230 children & 43 police officers.  211 were raped, 319 robbed, 66 killed by execution, & 47 tortured.  11 murdered other inmates.

A jury of 12 people & a judge confirmed for each inmate that their crimes were so atrocious and they were so dangerous that they not only did not deserve to live, but they were so dangerous that the only safe recourse was the death penalty.  Recognizing how dangerous these killers are, the prison houses them 1 person to a cell and does not provide them with work, leaving them locked in their cells most of the day.

Prop. 34 wants to ignore all of this and save $ by placing these killers in less-restrictive prisons where they share cells.  They also want to provide them opportunities for work, where they have more freedom, access to other inmates and guards, & more chances to make weapons.

Prop . 34 also destroys any incentive for the 34,000 inmates already serving life without parole to kill again.  There would be no death penalty.  They are already serving a life sentence, so why not get a name by killing another inmate or a guard?

Prop. 34 also takes away the money for inmates to challenge their convictions.  If innocent, they will spend the rest of their life in jail, celled with vicious killers.  Prop. 34 will cause more deaths of innocent people– guards and people wrongfully convicted but no longer able to fight it in court.

And they refer to Prop. 34 as the SAFE Act! 

0

Undo

View all comments (5)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us