Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


​Ruling gives defense in terror case unprecedented access to govt spying request

Published time: January 30, 2014 03:54
Reuters / Gaston De Cardenas

Reuters / Gaston De Cardenas

The defense for a man accused of attempted terrorism will be able to review the US government’s surveillance application against him, a federal judge said Wednesday in an unprecedented ruling.

US District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman’s ruling is the first time a defendant’s legal team will have access to a surveillance application prosecutors submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court. Whether spying then took place is unclear, but, nevertheless, the government’s request will be made available to the defense.

The pretrial ruling is in the case of Adel Daoud, a US citizen from outside Chicago who denies allegations that in 2012 he took a fake car bomb from an undercover FBI agent, parked it outside a downtown Chicago nightclub and pressed a phony trigger.

Daoud's defense team has said that if the government used heightened surveillance to monitor Daoud and only then was he targeted by an FBI sting, they could challenge the constitutionality of pertinent evidence.

Prosecutors had pressed for the secret application to be kept from the defense, yet the ruling means the defense may challenge the prosecution on the nature of the application.

“This finding is not made lightly, and follows a thorough and careful review of the FISA application and related materials,” Coleman wrote. “The Court finds however that an accurate determination of the legality of the surveillance is best made in this case as part of an adversarial proceeding. The adversarial process is the bedrock of effective assistance of counsel protected by the Sixth Amendment.”

The application could indicate how investigators decided Daoud, 20, needed further scrutiny, whether by informant or surveillance operations. Daoud’s lead attorney Thomas Durkin called the decision a “historic, courageous and very meaningful ruling to preserve the integrity of the adversarial process," according to AP.

In oral arguments over the matter earlier this month, Durkin pleaded with Coleman to restore “lost faith” in the judicial system by ordering the disclosure of how and whether the government used the very spying methods first exposed to the public from revelations supplied by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in his client’s case. Though Coleman did not go that far in Wednesday’s ruling, limiting the defense to the FISA court application.

The compliant, secretive FISA court, created in 1978, approves government requests for surveillance orders.

The US attorney’s office in Chicago did not comment to the AP on the ruling. They may appeal Coleman’s decision before Daoud’s trial begins on April 7.

In her opinion, Coleman said one of the government’s main arguments for shielding the FISA application from the defense was that such a disclosure had never been done before.

"That response is unpersuasive," the judge wrote. "Without a more adequate response to the question of how disclosure of materials to cleared defense counsel pursuant to protective order jeopardizes national security, this court believes that the probable value of disclosure and the risk of nondisclosure outweigh the potential danger of disclosure to cleared counsel."

A further ruling will be needed to determine if any information in the FISA application can actually be used in the trial.

Comments (5)


Gregory Lee 30.01.2014 16:18

This is more of the same: "Policy engineered indiscriminant acceptance of faceless authority." Almost one hundred years of gradualism from the elite deviant class. "Its become virtually important for the state to use all its power to suppress descent, for truth is the moral enemy of the lie; and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the state." (Goebbels Nazi Germany 1933)


Alex Semiletow 30.01.2014 12:42

Only totalitarian governments prosecute suspected criminals without showing the evidence used against them. We, in the US, are just a small step behind the former Soviet union during Stalin's time - GULAG's.
Guantan amo is an exercise in that direction, even starts with the same two letters...


Regula 30.01.2014 11:59

It must be that the judge saw from the FISA court application alone what the lawyer contended - a breach of constitutional protections and consequent invalidity of the evidence.

View all comments (5)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us