Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Judge orders release of US Marine detained for Facebook posts

Published time: August 23, 2012 19:02
Edited time: August 24, 2012 01:44
Brandon J. Raub (Photo from facebook.com/BrandonJRaub)
Download video (50.59 MB)
Embed

On the basis that there was zero reason to detain a retired Marine and commit him to a medical facility for psychiatric evaluation, a Virginia judge has demanded that Brandon Raub be released from custody immediately.

Raub, 26, had his home visited one week earlier by FBI, Secret Service and local law enforcement agents who expressed concern over a series of Facebook posts he had made on his public social networking profile. They detained him without charge and admitted him to a local hospital for evaluation.

"The petition is so devoid of any factual allegations that it could not be reasonably expected to give rise to a case or controversy," reads a signed statement by Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharrett, which was provided to the Richmond Times-Dispatch Thursday afternoon.

Judge Sharrett adds that he was shocked to find that a magistrate did not include any grounds at all for holding Raub, who was placed in custody for a full week without any charges being pressed.

Earlier in the week, attorneys representing Raub from the Rutherford Institute attacked the mishandling of the case by suggesting that the entire ordeal was a war on their client’s constitutional rights.

“This is not how justice in America is supposed to work — with Americans being arrested for doing nothing more than exercising their First Amendment rights, forced to undergo psychological evaluations, detained against their will and isolated from their family, friends and attorneys. This is a scary new chapter in our history,” Rutherford Institute President John W. Whitehead says in a statement released on Tuesday this week. “Brandon Raub is no different from the majority of Americans who use their private Facebook pages to post a variety of content, ranging from song lyrics and political hyperbole to trash talking their neighbors, friends and government leaders.”

Days before he was detained, Raub had made a series of posts that reportedly worried the authorities. His most recent postings included critique of the investigation of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and other messages, such as, “The Revolution will come for me. Men will be at my door soon to pick me up to lead it” and “Sharpen up my axe; I'm here to sever heads.

“The bottom line is his freedom of speech has been violated,” Raub's mother, Cathleen Thomas, told the Associated Press after her son was detained. On Thursday, she told the Times-Dispatch that the entire ordeal has been “phenomenal” and that others could be considered because, “This could have happened to anyone.”

"This has never been about anything but freedom of speech…. We're going to continue to post on Facebook,” Thomas continued, adding that she considered her son a “true patriot.”

Raub served in both Iraq and Afghanistan and says he had been considering reenlisting before last week’s events.

Comments (34)

Arklight (unregistered) 30.08.2012 01:38

Part of the problem is the naval service's practice of retaining sailors and marines as Fleet Reserve after discharge, until age 50; I'd suspect that somehow the military law has been tweaked so that social 'offenses' still fall under military authority, much of which has no relationship to the Constitution at all. Although Raub may appear to be a civilian these days, he may well be subject to military punushment for such things as 'uttering and publishing', or committing some act which may be prejudicial to good order and discipline. It's not going to get any better any time soon.

0

Undo

Patriot Girl 24.08.2012 19:50

SNAFU (unregistered) wrote in #9

LT (unregistered) wrote in #6
But who was watching when James Holmes was online ordering 6,000 rounds of ammo? Oh. No one. As you were. O_o There's nothing illegal about ordering 6000 rounds of ammunition.
Y ou missed the point all together.  Apparently, it is quite important to watch what a man posts to his facebook page but not another guy buying thousands of rounds of ammo.
So, just because the crazy in CO didn't voice his opinion on facebook, he wasn't worth worrying about?

+1

Undo

sandcanyongal 24.08.2012 09:31

LT (unregistered) wrote in #6 But who was watching when James Holmes was online ordering 6,000 rounds of ammo?  And the news reports that the Social Security Administra tion (SSA) is planning to purchase 174,00 0 hollow point bullets. They must expect a rush of people and plan to shoot them all.

+3

Undo

View all comments (34)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us