“Stop the 9-11 cover-up”
Published: 11 September, 2009, 10:32
Edited: 26 October, 2009, 02:19
Citizen Participation in the 2004 Dynamic Truth Movement through 9/11 Visibilty Project actions.
(14.2Mb) embed videoTAGS: Anniversary, Protest, Terrorism, USA
American citizens are pounding the streets, still searching for answers because the official version of the 9/11events has failed to satisfy many people, and there are calls for a fresh investigation into the tragedy.
The push for another investigation into the 9/11 attacks grows larger with each passing year, particularly today when the US is commemorating the eighth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, which claimed almost three thousand lives.
Manuel Badillo’s uncle died when the Twin Towers came down. He believes the US leaders had prior knowledge of the impending attacks but consciously failed to act.
He asks, “Why was there no justice yet? Why is there no accountability?”
Badillo is among roughly 80,000 New Yorkers petitioning for a new, impartial, probe to answer the questions many believe state and federal officials are failing to address.
Manuel Badillo says, "The majority of family members do not believe the story. First responders do not believe what they were told by the government. All of this turned out to be lies, what we have been told. 60% of the commissioners do not believe the story they received."
Critics say the 9/11 Commission Report, presented as the official version of events, failed to hold a single individual accountable for the numerous warnings leading up to, on and after September 11.
The NYC Coalition of Accountability Now (CAN) is an organization that is focused on getting a referendum during this November’s mayoral election, to allow New Yorkers the chance to vote for a new 9/11 investigation.
“It’s absolutely essential for the world, for the well-being of the world, that we understand why 9/11 occurred; who was behind it,” says Ted Walter, executive director of CAN. “Because if we have a false understanding, we’re going to be basing policies on that false understanding.”
Pressure’s even coming from the west coast – Hollywood actor Charlie Sheen has written a 15-page public letter to the president calling for another 9/11 inquiry.
But a move like Sheen’s can be quite a gamble in the domain of American public opinion. Just ask Van Jones, Obama’s former ‘green jobs tsar’. He stepped down because of hysteria over his support for and association with 9/11 truth-finders.
“Van Jones should have stuck to his feelings and to his democratic actions that he took, and his intuition, because the majority of Americans, the majority of New Yorkers, all the polls show it, know the government did not tell us the entire story about 9/11,” says Manuel Badillo.
Eight years ago all New Yorkers were standing shoulder-to-shoulder on the day nearly three thousand people perished from attacks. Now the citizens are standing on one side, police officers on the other, and many are asking for accountability, a demand from which these Americans refuse to back off.
Read also September 11 attacks: The greatest fraud of the 21st century
11.09.2009, 08:56
4 comments
9/11 survivor: there was an explosion prior to plane’s impactA loud bang shook the building and shortly afterwards the plane hit the skyscraper, states survivor William Rodriguez, who was a janitor in the North Tower of the WTC and helped to rescue others after the planes hit. |
11.09.2009, 12:48
3 comments
9/11 an inside job? NYC speaks outWeb journalist Lori Harfenist found on the streets of NYC that, eight years after the 9/11, New Yorkers think it’s scary to think it was an inside job, because if so – what can you believe in or and who can you trust? |
@ Guenter Monkowski Just a few comments on your questions: > 1. Where was the US Airforce that day? There is absolutely no circumstance in which the first two planes could or would have been shot down. Those two planes caused the majority of the loss of life on 911. Given that the military were not told about the other planes until after they crashed there is not much you can expect them to do about them. > 2. How can a plane completely vanish in an almost round hole into a Pentagon tract without any traces of human debris? >It is eight years on. There was a 90ft wide hole in the ground floor of the Pentagon. The bodies of all of the passengers ,apart from one baby, were identified using DNA and dental records. 3. The crash in Pennsylvania also didn't leave much traces. The crater was excavated and the mutilated bodies of the passengers were recovered along with personal possessions and the remains of the plane. > 4. WTC7 the Salmon Brothers building why was it demolished? It suffered a structural collapse due to serious damage from debris combined with hours of out-of-control fires. The firefighters realised hours beforehand that it was going to collapse because the structural damage , even before the fires took hold, was so serious. They were not in the least bit surprised when it collapsed. > 5. The World Trade center buildings came down in a very controlled way. I doubt if you will ever witness a more un-controlled chaotic collapse of a building in your lifetime. > The Bush/Cheny gang should be questioned. George Bush and Dick Chaney are not a gang. They were President and vice President of the United States.
@ Joe Lopisi "The reason I say this is that I have been reading articles and watching videos about the lies and deceptions surrounding 9/11 for the past three years" How many of the articles and videos have you watched in all those three years that concluded that 911 was an inside job? -as opposed to those that didn't? How many of the 'inside job' websites told you what the 'official version' was? -in scathing sarcastic terms, distorting and mis-representing it? "1. How is it that at the crash site of Flight 93, NBC and Fox News on September 11, 2001 reported on the scene with video coverage that there was no sign of a jetliner, engines, bodies or luggage? You can go to my website which is www.911insidejob.net and watch this video report which is on my home page. It has never been shown again on the mainstream media." Could that be because there was no sign of a jetliner,engines ,bodies or luggage? The crash site was excavated by the FBI and the bodies of the passengers and their personal possessions and the debris of the plane itself recovered. Maybe they should have said " There is not much sign of a plane here- they said it on NBC and Fox News! Lets go home."