VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART I: 3 towers, 2 jets   Comments  
MORE ON THE STORY
09.09.2009, 17:50 59 comments

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job

9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story?

Obama's flight pictured on a mobile phone. 29.04.2009, 23:00 4 comments

Tempting theory on “Scare Force One” flyover that freaked out NYC

US President Barack Obama admits mistake after decision to stage a ‘flyover photo op’ of the presidential airplane over New York City, with a fighter jet giving chase, stirs up memories of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Firemen and emergency rescue teams on site after attack on World Trade Center. September, 11, 2001 (Neville Elder) 24.08.2009, 08:49 5 comments

Hundreds of 9/11 first responders die of cancer

New York's emergency services were among the first on the scene of the 9/11 disaster but put their personal safety in jeopardy. Those involved in the rescue and clean-up operation quickly became national heroes.

Osama Bin Laden appears on Al-Jazeera Television praising the attacks of September 11th (Photo by Maher Attar) 12.09.2009, 20:30 30 comments

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. Part 3: Osama bin Laden

Osama bin Laden was suspect number one on 9/11, yet the U.S. authorities commit yet another inexplicable act: they release all members of the bin Laden family who were residing at the time in the US.

South building of the Pentagon after the suicide attack on September 11, 2001 (Photo by Bill Vaughan) 12.09.2009, 12:28 21 comments

911 Reason why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. Part II. The Pentagon Crash

Andrews Air Force Base is a mere 10 miles away from the Pentagon, yet 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began not a single fighter jet had been activated to intercept American Airlines Flight 77.

Members of a human rights group in Chile hold pictures of former Foreign Minister Orlando Letelier, 12 November 1993 (AFP Photo) 22.09.2010, 04:27 2 comments

Questions linger 34 years after Letelier assassination

It was an act of international terrorism conducted right in the heart of Washington DC’s international zone – embassy row.

Citizen Participation in the 2004 Dynamic Truth Movement through 9/11 Visibilty Project actions. 11.09.2009, 10:32 14 comments

“Stop the 9-11 cover-up”

American citizens are pounding the streets, still searching for answers because the official version of the 9/11events has failed to satisfy many people, and there are calls for a fresh investigation into the tragedy.

26.10.2010, 15:47 7 comments

Cashflow to Caucasus terror cells killed

Russia’s anti-terrorist committee has confirmed to RT that it has busted a foreign financial network used to supply money to militants in the North Caucasus.

RIA Novosti / Newsteam 11.09.2010, 23:05 9 comments

Bomb rocks Russia’s south

Seventeen people have been killed and nearly 180 injured as a powerful car bomb attack hit the central market in the city of Vladikavkaz, the capital of the republic of North Ossetia.

10.03.2010, 07:51 21 comments

Americans continue to fight for 9/11 truth

Nearly a decade after the national tragedy of 9/11, voices still speak loudly saying people of the US are denied the truth.

911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART I: 3 towers, 2 jets

Published: 10 September, 2009, 22:28
Edited: 27 October, 2009, 05:43


Never before or after 9/11 have steel-framed skyscrapers collapsed due to fire.

 
18 COMMENTS
G.W. September 10, 2009, 14:30 quote
0

My brother was standing outside at the Pentagon on 9/11 and he saw the plane hit the building. A plane hit the building period. I believe my brother and I believe others who saw it fly into the building too. I also believe parents of a child killed on the plane who saw the building right after the event... they knew that their child's remains were just gone in the horrible fire and explosion. I BELIEVE THEM AND THE HORROR THEY EXPRESSED KNOWING AT THAT SCENE OF DESTRUCTION, NO BODY WOULD BE FOUND. These so called " 9/11truthers" are too weird and too strange to be believed. The Architect of the Twin Towers says he KNOWS why the building collasped and for awhile he suffered severe depression because he felt that his building design was flawed. I believe he finally overcame the depression and now realizes that he was NOT at fault and it was the FAULT OF THOSE MURDERERS, THOSE TERRORISTS who brought down the twin towers.

G.W. September 10, 2009, 14:42 quote
0

All of you 9/11 "truthers" are NUTS!! This is all a cover up for the fact that BILL CLINTON and his administration was asleep at the wheel !! "truthers" are ALL Clinton supporters like recently disgraced and former Obama official, Van Jones. Clinton "hamstrung" the security agencies and their attempts to secure America. Clinton was opposed to those who were supposed to protect the USA. Clinton KNEW thet the first attempt to bring down the towers in 1993 was done by islamic radicals and he knew who their fellow islamic conspirators were. Clinton was a good friend of the lady lawyer who defended the islamics who were convicted of the 1993 bombings. Cliinton tried to blame CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS and TALK RADIO in the USA for the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. When it was in fact a disgruntled former US Soldier who had ties to an islamic group and was NO conservative.

Vesa September 10, 2009, 15:00 quote
0

G.W. - this is not about Clinton or party politics, but about truth. As regards the first WTC bombing in 1993, it was the FBI informant, Emad Salem, who provided the terrorists with the bomb. Before that, he had suggested to his FBI handlers that he would create a fake bomb, but his handlers had other plans, as even the New York Times vaguely reported (Ralph Blumenthal, "Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast", October 28, 1993) after the event. If Salem had not secretly recorded his conversations with his FBI handlers and come out with them, he too would probably have been jailed for the attack. In any case, even the 1993 bombing could have been prevented, as the bomb provider himself was no one else than an FBI informant.

Vesa September 10, 2009, 16:33 quote
0

A small correction to an excellent article: The final official version on WTC 7 does not say it was "compromised by falling debris". NIST did, for years, toy with the idea that the debris from the North Tower caused or contributed to WTC 7's destruction. They also speculated about the role of diesel fuel stored in the building's generators. In 2006, NIST's lead WTC investigator Shyam Sunder said in an interview to New York Magazine: "But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7." In their final report in November 2008, then, they blame the total collapse on a "new phenomenon" (NIST's term) in building disasters: "thermal expansion", which caused central column number 79 to fail, which was somehow (NIST doesn't explain how) followed by the failure of the remaining 80 columns during a few seconds, after which the building came at almost freefall speed to its foundations. According to NIST, the failure of column number 79 alone would in all circumstances have destroyed the skyscraper. The building had 81 columns, but NIST now says it ultimately depended on just one column. Still, a few months ago a New York judge ruled that WTC 7 had not been constructed negligently.

Justin September 10, 2009, 20:38 quote
0

Actually, there are About Half of the families of victims of 9/11 who are having Second thoughts about what happend. when i first heard about the "Truthers" i said those guys are nuts, and like so many people in my nation i said "We're American's" how many times in History have the people been blinded by their own pride. the truthers have good questions, and instead of getting answers they're being called names... there are various people looking at it, in our own universities architects and construction men who say it was the best demolition job seen.. but of course there is a problem, being people are dead and the towers are gone. i don't know that i would call myself a truther exactly, but they raise some questions that Deserve answering. we Americans have been asleep at the wheel that much is true. about 90% of us dont even realize the word Democracy is not in our constitution. we're (Supposed to be) a Republic a Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting over whats for dinner.. course we're not even the democracy they say we are, just do a little research and you'd see we're following the communist manifesto. and the people dont care, we have our couches, our beer, and our football. the media calls people who question the gov, un-patriotic or conspiracy theorist's but i ask, How much different is a conspiracy from a strategy??? Nero burned down rome and blamed the Christians for it, Hitler burned down their state building and blamed it on poland wasnt it?.. wasted so much time trusting the gov.. i shouldve thought... hmm they arent doing anything the people want them to do at all... and either its because theyre idiots or because theyre up to something.. well if i've angered anyone because of this im sorry. im just a person who wants to know what's going on.. but i thought about it at work. for a conspiracy to work you dont need alot of people really. all it takes is a few key people in high places behind closed doors. that and blind obedience..

Justin September 10, 2009, 20:47 quote
0

and no i didn't support clinton, actually up until i saw Ron Paul i didn't care much about the gov.

Justin September 10, 2009, 20:50 quote
0

P.S. thanks Russia for asking the question, even though i havent paid much attention to anyone outside of america, i caught one of your clips from Gary Franchi's Reality Report, on your story of the federal reserve having to spill it's beans so to speak about where there money is going to.

RedCoat September 11, 2009, 04:07 quote
0

I find it hard to believe that people (most in fact) still believe that Islamic Terrorist infiltrated the U.S, took over airliners and flew them, under the radar, into the Twin Towers. And that the airliners they hijacked were able to totally and utterly destroy buildings that officed the CIA and were build (And continuously renovated) to take several hits from Cruise Missiles and airplanes and fires. And how they even managed to hijack a plane and run it into the Pentagon, biggest crap in the world! With all the evidence out there, people, I believe, Tell themselves to listen to the official statement and make believe because they don't want to move outside their comfort zone and it would hurt their world-view. Most 'Truthers' say the US government knew the attacks were coming. I agree, because they were the attackers in the first place.

MEJanssen September 11, 2009, 13:39 quote
0

Most Americans do not believe the conspiracy because they just cannot accept the idea their own government would be complicit in such treachery. I felt that way for years, despite being quite willing to believe the Bush administration lied about reasons for the Iraq war. I just refused to believe the government would be part of such a treasonous plan, so it had to be Al Qaeda that acted alone. But then I kept tripping over the stumbling block - that three towers fell in NYC but there were only two planes. The government still has not been able to explain away the fall of the third tower. Catching fire from the other buildings would have left a skeleton, and it would not have pancaked down like it did. All the towers came down the same way, and thermite was found in the rubble. Those towers at World Trade Center were taken down by more than jet fuel fire. The next question is always: by whom? If you pull a loose thread on a sweater, there is always the danger that the whole thing will unravel. There are loose threads all over the government's version of the story. Thanks RT for discussing this again.

Lewn September 12, 2009, 09:03 quote
0

@G.W. about Pentagon: (G.W. is like G.W.Bush?) If a plane hit the Pentagon why FBI has confiscated and do not show to the public what the video cameras around the site recorded? Why there are not seen any plane debris (wings, engines) at the crash site? Why the grass on the ground near the building is intact?

Greg September 13, 2009, 04:17 quote
0

I too had a friend on the grounds of Arlington Cemetery who watched the plane impact the Pentagon. So for that part, the conspiracy folks are deluding themselves. I also had a friend who worked in the Pentagon tell me about the damage and it matched what I know happens to jets during testing impacting similar objects. As to the Twin Towers, compare what the architect says with what happened.

tennishawk September 14, 2009, 04:33 quote
0

The Islamic terrorists openly accepted the blame for 911 and other bombings including those in Russia.Professor of Structural Engineering at the University of Newcastle, John Knapton] told BBC News Online: "The world trade center was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, "The buildings survived the impact and the explosion but not the fire, and that is the problem." "The 35 tonnes of aviation fuel will have melted the steel... all that can be done is to place fire resistant material around the steel and delay the collapse by keeping the steel cool for longer." Keep in mind the steel in the towers did not have to melt only bend under the weight before it collapsed. In Scientific American M.I.T. professor of civil and environmental engineering Eduardo Kausel states: I believe that the intense heat softened or melted the structural elements--floor trusses and columns--so that they became like chewing gum, and that was enough to trigger the collapse. Some even claim that flight 93 was never found. However, the plane did crash and exploded with tons of fuel that it carried. The impact left a huge crater. There were witnesses on the ground that saw it come down. Debris of the aircraft and body remains of the passengers were scattered over 8 miles. Who can forget the recordings of the phone calls that some passengers made to their loved ones before the crash. The cockpit voice recorder transcript was publicly released on April 12, 2006. Jurors for the Zacharias Moussaoui trial heard the tape as part of the proceedings. After denying his connection to the 9-11 attack he admitted his guilt on March 2006. He testified he intended to fly a hijacked plane into the White House.

Vesa September 15, 2009, 20:40 quote
0

Actually, Bin Laden denied his involvement several times after the attack, and he is not even listed by the FBI as a suspect for the 9/11 attacks, although Afghanistan was officially invaded to get him. As regards the avation fuel, it burned out within minutes of the impact (and in the case of the South Tower, largely outside the building). Office fires can never melt steel, as they never reach the required temperatures; yet molten steel was indeed reported and even photographed. The official story claims that ordinary office fires levelled three skyscrapers to their foundations. There are now more than 850 professional signatories at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, who like many others have a hard time believing that fires could be used in lieu of controlled demolition, and a peer-reviewed study documenting the presence of nanothermite residues in WTC dust samples has been published.

john September 19, 2009, 09:54 quote
0

No, Bin Laden does takes the blame. America still has a $50 million bounty on Osama Does not anyone read anymore? Sept 13 from Assoc. Press: The purpose of his address Sunday, bin Laden said in the SITE translation, is "to remind you of the causes" of Sept. 11, chiefly "your support to your Israeli allies who occupy our land of Palestine." I can name my sources, thank you.The 911 "truthers" have no proof. Does anyone know history? Remember all the Islamic attacks on Americans? Islamic war on Israel? Did you know America supports Israel? "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" was supposedly a group of architects that proved it. "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" has been exposed. They do not check any credentials of anyone who claims to be an architect. They will accept any application to join immediately. Try it! As an example someone has successfully added George W Bush as Architect among others who are not architects. The AIA or any other legitimate architectural organization has not said anything contrary. In fact Professor of Structural Engineering at the University of Newcastle, John Knapton and M.I.T. professor of civil and environmental engineering Eduardo Kausel have explained how the heat on 911, though not enough to melt steel was enough to bend under the sheer weight of the building. The steel was not insulated with concrete as older buildings were. They give more details but it is beyond the intelligence of some and that of George Soros' propaganda machine.

A.Wright October 26, 2009, 23:54 quote
0

@MEJanssen The firechiefs at the scene saw that WTC 7 was seriously damaged ,with a bulge in the facade going up three floors and a corner of the building removed up to the 20th floor.They thought there was a serious danger of a collapse so they cordened it off and didn't try to fight the fires. They realised by about 2 in the afternoon that it was going to collapse and that it was only a matter of time. When it did finally collapse it was no surprise to them.These are experienced firefighters who know a bit about fires and what they can do.

ELGUAPO77 July 11, 2011, 23:30 quote
+1

@ A.Wright you are a complete idiot. At no point did anyone in the NYFD think for one second that Building 7 was going to collapse (fact). When did Firefighters become structual engineers? NEVER. Actually near Bulinding 7 was a triage center for victims and only right before the collapse did they remove personel (FACT). I have seen and heard all the testimony of eye witnesses who were there. So keep spewing your Facists Geroge Bush Propaganda but real Americans who have brains know that this was a Military coupe of our own country. I love how you say in your comment that the firefighters quit fighting the fire because they knew the building was going to collapse. Yeah all the sudden firefighters quit fighting fires. Thats why your a moron.

G.W. wrote in #1

My brother was standing outside at the Pentagon on 9/11 and he saw the plane hit the building. A plane hit the building period. I believe my brother and I believe others who saw it fly into the building too. I also believe parents of a child killed on the plane who saw the building right after the event... they knew that their child's remains were just gone in the horrible fire and explosion. I BELIEVE THEM AND THE HORROR THEY EXPRESSED KNOWING AT THAT SCENE OF DESTRUCTION, NO BODY WOULD BE FOUND. These so called " 9/11truthers" are too weird and too strange to be believed. The Architect of the Twin Towers says he KNOWS why the building collasped and for awhile he suffered severe depression because he felt that his building design was flawed. I believe he finally overcame the depression and now realizes that he was NOT at fault and it was the FAULT OF THOSE MURDERERS, THOSE TERRORISTS who brought down the twin towers.


soulshift July 12, 2011, 20:16 quote
+1

911 TOTALLY an inside job!

ENJ99 July 14, 2011, 08:44 quote
-1

When was the last time has any steel-framed skyscraper been attacked by jets? Referring to Madrid is meaningless. 10 years later and  still mindless fools call it an inside job. Lots of assumptions, accusations and unsupported claims and nothing more. I am at least thankful MOST don't these fools seriously.

POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image