Russia lashes out at NATO for not fighting Afghan drug production
Published: 28 February, 2010, 03:39
Edited: 08 June, 2010, 14:22
TAGS: NATO, Russia, Drugs, Afghanistan, USA
The US refusal to destroy opium poppy crops in Afghanistan guarantees that raw drug sources there will be inviolable, leading to heavy drug use in Russia, the head of the Russian federal drug control agency said.
The amount of narcotics brought into Russia has increased two-fold since the beginning of the anti-terrorism operation in Afghanistan, Viktor Ivanov, Russian Federal Drug Control Service chief, said on Saturday.
“Afghan heroin amounts to 90% of all drugs sold in Russia. Annual supplies stand at 35 tonnes or 5 billion shots,” Ivanov said, as quoted by Interfax news agency.
At the same time, the Taliban’s share in Afghan drug production is minimal, Ivanov pointed out.
“Nevertheless, the NATO command has focused entirely on this minority producer and generously lets local Afghan authorities combat the remaining 99% of drug production,” he said.
It is high time to formally declare the phenomenal narcotics production in Afghanistan to be a threat to international peace and security, Ivanov said.
Viktor Ivanov warned that drugs production in Afghanistan is “a global factor destabilizing the situation in Russia as the target market and in Central Asia which has become a transit territory.”
Moreover, drug trafficking from Afghanistan energizes negative processes in the North Caucasus, Ivanov added. Drug availability in the region increased by eight times, and in the Russian republic of Dagestan by 60 times, noted Ivanov.
The federal drug control agency’s head stressed that drug trafficking growth causes a proportionate increase in terrorist attacks and other crimes in the North Caucasus.
According to the Federal Drug Control Service’s data, there are up to five million drug addicts in Russia and half of them are addicted to Afghan heroin.
Annually, tens of thousands people in Russia die due to drug addictions.
27.02.2010, 18:51
6 comments
Did the US Federal Reserve finance Saddam Hussein’s weapon purchases?As Congress debates legislation to make the US Federal Reserve less secretive, Republican Ron Paul said the Bank loaned Iraq billions of dollars to buy US weapons in the 1980s. |
01.03.2010, 10:52
3 comments
Russia’s unilateral disarmament is out of question – Russian diplomatThe US prefers to avoid any legal limits in developing national missile systems, which is absolutely unacceptable for Russia, said the chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, Konstantin Kosachev. |
The merchants of death and deception would be very pleased to see the Russian youth get drawn in the narcotic sea flooding from Afghanistan. There is a purpose for ignoring one of the main sources of cash flow. Drug money has been used to finance armed groups, the Contras in Nicaragua were financed with drug money; the arms purchases in Afghanistan have the same mark. So, who benefits with allowing the grow and commercialization of heroine in Afghanistan? A great deal of heroine is channeled to Russia thereby having an deadly impact in the Russian young population and destroying the seeds of future generations badly needed in a country threatened by a demographic catastrophe. Some western powers would be delighted to see such picture. Russia wake up!! Their long shot is Russian natural resources, the biggest reserves in the entire world.
Critic: "Is there ANYTHING about that war, anything AT ALL that is good? Can someone name me one single thing?" "Good" is a relative term. The Afghan war has been very good for some and terrible for others. 1. Bush's invasion of Afghanistan made Eric Prince, the founder of Blackwater, a multi-millionaire. 2. The Pentagon generals are happy with their new sandbox in which they play their "war games" and test their new killing toys. 3. Karzai, his cousins, and their cronies have become immensely wealthy off of American bribes. 4. Opium growers and heroin dealers are smiling. Morally speaking, the Americans have brought a bloody hell to the Afghan people.












The whole operation started after a bad tear - Talibans made a big harm to secret services all around the world, as they almost diminished opium production by force. They simly disallowed it a shoot most who refused to accept that. Just see the graphs on OSN and other sites - 2001 was they worst year from the perspective of organization dealing with heroin , ie secret services. After the invasion, production of opium rose again and 2009 was the best year ever - mission almost accomplished, opium production is above original levels. But there is still around half of a country not planting... Just see reagan cocaine weapons in google to find out the available proof that "civilised" nations use drug sales in their own countries to raise money for activities forbidden by parliaments. A assume taht russian secret service is not different in this, there is no reason why it should be.