Regardless of what motivated Bradley to leak the information, those attending this protest in support of Manning agree what he did exposed the lies of war.

“There is no secret to the Afghanis or the Iraqis; they know their people are being killed every day. The secrets are hidden from us, the American people,” said Medea Benjamin, Co-founder of Code Pink: Women for Peace and one of the organizers of the event.

“He did something truly patriotic, bringing the truth out, something our mainstream media doesn’t do. And unfortunately it’s up to him to do something so brave and daring to actually release the truth to the American people,” said another protester.

There were two protests happening simultaneously, one for Manning, the other, against him.

While the demonstration was held outside a larger marine base, it didn’t stop former military officers or their spouses from voicing their opinions.

“People homeless, no jobs, and we are constantly giving other countries our money for wars that we should be at,” said one local.

The activists then marched down the main street of the small town; they were quickly confronted by the local police.

But the protest wasn’t only for the man who allegedly blew the whistle; it was for the content of the documents now coined the Pentagon Papers 2.0. While history judged the Vietnam leak as significant, it remains to be seen whether the WikiLeaks documents will leave the same legacy.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon fears classified documents due to be released by WikiLeaks may be even more damaging than those that had been published before. The US military says it knows the nature of the additional 15,000 documents that Julian Assange – the man who runs the website – has pledged to disclose.

Last month, it published more than 90,000 documents, creating a stir both with the public and US defense officials.

Wayne Madsen, an American investigative journalist and RT contributor, believes that these massive leaks could even be orchestrated by the US itself.

“Assange is showing up in news conferences in London, the Australians are saying that they are not going to seek any arrest of him, ostensibly he is an Australian national. So we see a lot of governments, Britain and Australia, not wanting to take any action against him and you’ve got to wonder – is the Pentagon really serious when they are saying we want these leaks to stop. Maybe it’s part of a psychological warfare campaign and we’ve seen the Pentagon wage those successfully in the past. They had many people convinced Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they never did,” Wayne Madsen says.

“These leaks seem to only benefit a realigning of US strategy in both Iraq and Afghanistan. A lot of people are getting very suspicious about the motivations, it’s a bit of PR but also, I think, there may be a little bit of playing into the hands of those who want the US not to pull out of Iraq or Afghanistan, but to remain in both countries.”