Who is really in power in USA: Obama or Clinton? Obama encourages dialog and Clinton over rules it and talks about sanctions. Who is realy in charge of America?

Expanding for business is good for all the members, even if the USA do not like it. Any way there is no much the USA can do to stop the BRIC countries to prosper and balance the unilaterality of king kong, no more listening or being afraid of the US,given the economic downfall started on the casino wall street, the free printing of green bucks, violation of human rights, etc, basically no reason for any country to look up to the USA model, and the BRIC will continue their own pass.

This is a huge blow to the American prestige and credibility. As to who is in power in Washington, it seems it is neither Obama nor Clinton. In the words of president Ahmadinejad of Iran, America has become a captive nation in the hands of certain people in the world who will stop at nothing to prevent any rapprochement between the United States and Iran. This is not the statement of a mad man, the constant propaganda of the dis-reputed American media notwithstanding.

'Who is really in power in USA: Obama or Clinton?' neither. both are service the same masters though. 'Obama encourages dialog' yeah sure, when did Obama have those direct negotiations with Iran without preconditions hat he promised...? Obama is pursuing Bush's foreign policy using a slightly different rhetoric.

I think BRIC should have same four core members but it can add more states. BRIC should make a plan for additional members. It could be a platform for enhanced economic cooperation across the globe. There should be separate divisions, like financial, trade, energy etc and new members should be made CEO, chairman of board should be either of four BRIC. Thus it will give new member states front seat and they will be empowered unlike UN where most of members does not feel to be part of family. Countries like Turkey, Ukraine, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, Argentina, Iceland, Norway etc should be welcomed.

In last years Turkey showing more and more true independent policy. I think Turkey place is in BRIC and I will be happy to see that! In my opinion there is one thing what Turkey shall do before become part of BRIC and thats is to live NATO and expel Usa bases.Unlike NATO (USA tool) , BRIC block stand for multipolar,fair and peaceful world so Turkey have to show as first and foremost their honest intentions...EU play with you kids games(they do not want you in EU) for 50 years and NATO-USA use you for their own goals(never was in your national intrest) so I sugest you to cut the chains and be reborn as a Great power next to others in BRIC!My country been 500 years under your rule and I can tell you -you got much ,much more HONOR as nation than those from NATO-you do not belong there!Even your past history enemys got more respect for you than your own "friends"from EU and NATO-USA...Congratulation to you and Brasil on deal done with Iran! All talks about sanctions shall stop-any new sanctions on Iran(always peaceful true history-unlike West) will be UNLAWFUL! I do hope that Russia and China in the end will not support those unjust sanctions becouse there is not any valid reason after all for it...Iran done what is was ask for to do, so Russia and China shall stop this "show" once and for all! Thanke you.

I agree with you that Turkey must work toward leaving NATO. Note, in 2003, on the onset of the U.S/UK war of aggression against Iraq, Turkey refused to allow its soil to be used as a staging ground to attack Iraq. I think it is not so easy for Turkey to leave NATO at once but, the country is making the right moves by strengthening its economic ties most of all with Russia and now with Bric countries. Turkey is more important to the building up the power of BRIC than some other countries which are part of Bric at the moment. the recent Brazil/Turkey initiative to defuse the nuclear talks with Iran shows that the U.S and its allies can no longer treat the world as their playground.