I believe that if we destroy the poppy fields we could win the war from my understanding of the article. This is because I think, I do not know for sure, if the money from the heroine goes to the Taliban or Al Queda, but history implies and tells me yes. So if we cut off their funds were solid.

I am wondering how could Hillari earn the Nobel Peace Prize (NPP)? Could it be enough if she succeeds to achieve no any concrete peace result during her talks in Moscow, but to make a public statement about her good intentions? After all, wasn't that just the kind of doing things for which Obama got prized NPP? I mean, it is not right she to get nothing even though she managed to achieve nothing indeed for the peace. Therefore, Hillari deserves to get at least one quarter of the NPP, to be shared with Obama's three quarters, for they have both succeeded to gain no tangible peace result thus far. Besides, I should also be granted NPP as I deserve it no less than Obama or Hillari for did virtually nothing for the peace. Moreover, here I am declaring publicly for having very honorable intentions as for the peace.

I don't know if my reply will make it to you, but history has proven the money trail of heroin went into CIA pockets. Yes, during Soviet Afghan war they were also importing it, remember the heroin boom of the 1980s in the USA? They didn't give Stinger missles to Pakistani and Afghani tribal warriors for nothing. Ask yourself, why under ISAF and US control poppy fields are flourishing? Why did the British government stop the spraying of poppy fields? Why are they protecting them?