D-Day commemorations – a platform for controversy
Published: 07 June, 2009, 04:49
Edited: 13 March, 2010, 09:41
TAGS: Anniversary, Conflict, Military, EU, Russia, Politics, USA
Thousands of people gathered in Normandy to commemorate the sixty-fifth anniversary of the D-Day landings.
Leaders from the U.S., France, Britain and Canada attended a series of remembrance ceremonies, paying tribute to the war dead. However, there is concern that not all sacrifices are being equally appreciated
World leaders, veterans and their families are in Normandy to honor the Allied soldiers who died 65 years ago on the beaches of France. Row upon rows of crosses mark the graves of troops who fell in the Normandy Landings.
As U.S. President Barak Obama put it, the day of commemoration is for everyone:
"It’s about the Canadians, who came when they weren’t attacked, the Russians who sustained some of the heaviest casualties."
The leaders of the largest of those nations are at the ceremony: the Prime Ministers of Britain and Canada, and the presidents of the U.S. and France.
156,000 Allied troops stormed the beaches of Normandy, and 3 000 of them died on D-Day alone.
Another 9 000 were wounded or went missing. Many of them drowned before they reached the shore. Their ultimate sacrifice marked the beginning of the last chapter of the war. A year later, it was over.
But this wasn't the primary turning point in the Second World War. It was much earlier, but historians disagree on the exact date.
Some say the German failure at Stalingrad in 1943 reversed the action. Some point to an even earlier chapter, when Soviet troops stopped the German army outside Moscow in 1941.
Despite its key role in the Allies’ victory, the only time a Russian representative has attended the D-Day celebrations was on the 60th anniversary, when Germany’s chancellor was also invited.
To explain this, historians point to an uneasy partnership between the Allies and the Soviets by the end of the war – and the Germans, too, were fearful:
"The Russian army had already defeated us when the Americans, English and French came,” Ganz Erdman Shoenbek, a German veteran from Berlin explained.
“But frankly speaking, our attitude was more friendly to the US and English, due to our mentality, than to the Russians. Because we attacked first and we, of course, feared the Russians would take revenge and eventually this came to pass," he added.
Organizers say the remembrance ceremonies honor all those who died in the name of Freedom – and there lies the paradox.
Author Marek Halter was born in the Warsaw Ghetto and was liberated by the Russians. He feels he owes the Soviets a debt of gratitude, but is under no illusions about their motives:
"I’m not a fan of Stalin, but the Germans wanted to kill me, and the Russians saved my life. And I’m grateful. I think we have an obligation not to forget that, after all, they gave 23 million people to save us," he confessed.
Political commentator John Laughland says, given the massive losses they sustained, it’s ridiculous that the Russians aren’t included in occasions commemorating the Second World War:
“The memory of the Soviet war effort was quickly obscured by the Cold War. Very quickly, it took 3 years, then, at the end of 1948, the Cold War was definitely underway. Memory is eclipsed by 40 years of Cold War, and by the memory of Eastern Europe’s subjugation by the Communists, and by Communism itself," he said.
But perhaps Barack Obama’s acknowledgement of the Soviet Union’s bravery and sacrifice this weekend will be a step towards a regular joint commemoration of the heroism of those who lost their lives fighting fascism.
Nuclear talks put on holdMoscow and Washington might be working out a new non-proliferation deal, but Russia has no intention of reducing its nuclear arsenal until the US clarifies its anti-missile defense plans in Europe. |
07.06.2009, 09:48
6 comments
Do people trust Obama’s promise to bring change to Middle East?The US President traveled to Cairo this week to deliver a speech to the Muslim world, with the intention of bringing peace to the Middle East. But did he truly mean it, or is this trip all about creating an image? |
my opinion Rooosevelt and Churchill decided the D- day. because they were afraid to Russia. Russia could have larger part of Europe(include all Germany and France too).
Marzipan6 Could you give me one name of a US or french citizen who has been brought to justice for a crime agaisnt Humanity. In case you ignore it: no US citizen can be sent to theTPI of The Hague. In their own countries tell me what sentence received those who tortured, rapped and killed civilians in Algeria, Vietnam and Irak ? So don't give me lessons about democracies; just try to understand human nature. All that beckering about one nation or an other or a system or an other is just a waste of time and energy.I spent 20 years in America, working for its aerospace industry without having a single problem. I visited Russia 11 times (peraphs12 next month) and never had any problem there either... Peoples still able to analyse, think and be objective will be better off trying to make sure than mankind staddily progress but not regress. Decent human-beings who are the great majority can live in any actual decent political systems (including Russia).We must also admit than many humans have great difficulties to make the difference between a good and a bad normal behavior. If that is compounded at a national level, you end-up living in a consent anarchy (like the actual France). Consequently a rather tought system is necessary (mostly for the bad guys)... Often I visit friends who work at the CERN near Geneva. There, to solve a problem, scientist use video-conferences, Internet and all modern communication tools aviable to communicate all over the World. Why can the other decisions'makers (mostly politicians) do the same instead of wasting time and huge amount of money on planetary diplomatic furberies. We can already appreciate what a correct use of Internet can bring for a better worldwide undrestanding. Sorry Future Generations ! Sincerely. Jean-Claude Meslin












Great comments everyone. Marzipan6, here in Canada (and I'm SURE in the US as well) we barely heard anything about the eastern front, let alone the fact that Russia defeated Germany. We are taught here that D-Day was what turned the war in the other direction, so NO, RT is not setting up a straw man, at least I don't see it.