Have US Marines murdered in Beirut been forgotten?
Published: 24 June, 2009, 14:33
Edited: 20 December, 2009, 01:41
President and Nancy Reagan file by the flag-draped caskets of victims of the April 18, 1983, bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon in an April 23, 1983 file photo. Photo courtesy Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
(21.5Mb) embed videoTAGS: Military, Scandal, Middle East, Protest, Piracy, USA
Some in the US and the West have painted Iran’s opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi as a beacon for democracy, but he has a darker page in his biography, marked with the blood of Americans.
Last seen as the Iranian Prime Minister during the 1980s, Mousavi’s sudden explosive return to the world political stage comes after what the media dubbed “20 years of silence”.
Mousavi, who lost to a reelected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, claimed the vote was rigged and has demanded a recount.
He led a wave of massive anti-government rallies, which saw fierce clashes before a clampdown by the Iranian government, which rejects any accusations of voting irregularities.
The Iranian Interior Ministry has warned opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi to respect what it described as “the law and the people's vote” and to stop calling for further protests after his presidential election defeat.
Moussavi and murdered Marines in Beirut
Mir Hossein Mousavi’s leadership back in the 1980s was not a peaceful one. It was at the time
![]() Memorial of the attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut. There are 273 names engraved on its walls. |
Mir Hossein Mousavi was the Prime Minister of Iran between 1981 and 1989. At the time there were a series of attacks on US property in Lebanon’s Beirut. Both suicide bombing attacks happened in 1983. The one on the American embassy there claimed more than 60 lives, primarily embassy staff and American Marines. Another one struck the American Marines’ own barracks, killing 299 American servicemen.
As the highest official in Iran in 1980s, Mir Hossein Mousavi was not only directly connected to the assassination of American citizens, but is also believed to have actually handpicked the men who later were held responsible for these attacks. The sources who state this aren’t his Iranian opponents, but Americans. The most notable are former CIA operative Robert Perry and the chief naval officer at the time Admiral James Lyons. Both men were privy to a lot of information, given their jobs. Admiral Lyons later said that at the time they were wire tapping the Iranian Ambassador to Great Britain and this is where they got their information from.
Both Perry and Lyons point their fingers directly at Mir Hossein Mousavi, saying there is blood on his hands.
Moussavi and the Iranian nuclear programme
For the American mass media, Iran’s post-election clashes have been hitting the headlines
Rescue efforts continued for days at the Marine headquartersin Beirut. While the rescuers were at times hindered by sniper fire, some survivors were pulled from the rubble and airlifted to the RAF hospital in Cyprus or to U.S. and German hospitals in West Germany. |
If Iran’s nuclear programme is really such a concern for the US, then Mir Hossein Moussavi is not the right candidate for the US to be backing.
24.06.2009, 13:01
2 comments
Insurance companies deny compensation to Iraq contractorsInjured private military contractors, who worked in Iraq and Afghanistan, say insurance companies are refusing to cover medical treatment for their injuries. |
“Mousavi is going to be as tough on the US as Ahmadinejad”Mousavi’s image as a pro-Western figure is misleading, former CIA operative and author Robert Baer told RT, as he is an Iranian nationalist, not the pure democrat pictured by Americans. |
The article is good thus according to USA today from Aug. 1, 2009 'A long-awaited federal study finds that an estimated 32 million adults in the USA — about one in seven — are saddled with such low literacy skills that it would be tough for them to read anything more challenging than a children's picture book or to understand a medication's side effects listed on a pill bottle.' These people do not sit at home for they cannot read nor grasp text for adults. The question is: how many of them work in White House?














Mousavi is what the Iranians used to call a "moderate". Now he is what the Iranians call "a US/British puppet". 25 years ago the US called him a "terrorist". Now they see him as the focal point of an agreeable resistance movement. Everything is relative. Mousavi is a moderate by Iranian standards (if he were a full-fledged liberal the clerics never would've let him be on the ballot), he was a state-supporter of terrorism by American standards (and of course America is terrorist by Iranian standards), and he is/was the focal point a resistance movement against a regime with which the US is in a reciprocally hateful relationship. If the resistance movement actually succeeded with Mousavi directing it, the West would likely find the result a bit anti-climactic. However, the resistance movement isn't moderate, or at least it is not only moderate. It has a strong liberal component to it with which the West could have a good relationship.