&host=rt.com&uri=/usa/news/hillary-clinton-nato-security/comments/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
“NATO no challenge to Russian security” – Clinton
Published: 24 February, 2010, 00:55
Edited: 15 October, 2010, 11:00
Washington has strongly urged Moscow not to view NATO as a major threat to its security. The US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made the statement at an international seminar on NATO's mission for the 21st Century.
NATO objective is to further Balkanised Russia and gain control of Siberia oil. Russia should her strengthen security and economy.
Anyone familiar with the 'gangster embrace', or the 'mafia kiss' will identify with Clintons tactic here. A friendly embrace is offered to a person by the gangster on the pretext that they are now the best of friends and the past is forgotten. When the person embraces the gangster, the gangster kisses thier cheek whilst reaching for a blade, and then quickly, and without warning, stabs the person in the back (or cuts thier throat) - when the person has their guard down and least expects it. The US government walk around the globe acting like gangsters, knowing they can literally get away with murder. Russia had better watch its back.
NATO shouldn't even be existing nowadays. She needs to educate herself about the principle reason NATO existed in the first place before stating such
It is a matter of how much does one trust what comes of US Secretary of State's mouth. If one goes by history, I doub't the opposite should be true.
NATO is not a threat as NATO installs missiles all over the world. Why does Clinton even bother. No one believes her.
First of all when Russia dissolve their millitary pact a word was given that in that case Nato will not take any member from East! We all know what happend... So Russia will never trust them for SURE! Second Nato is not defence pact-its aggressive pact by all means...Their true nature is well known to all people in the world! Millions innorcent victims around the globe speak for themselfs! Nice words we heard from Clinton, but they dont mech reality on ground...I like to also corect something-Nato is not treath for Russia in the end, its other way around-Nato is treath for themself becouse if you give Russia a real reasons -you will PERISH...I hope this will never happend(again innorcent people will like always in history pay highest price ) but looking at your policy to promote wars insted of peace(we all will die one day anyway)) huge tragedy is around the corner..YOU WILL FORCE RUSSIA TO STOP TALKING AND ACT...IF YOU KEEP DOING THAT YOU DOING IT WILL HAPPEND 100% ...HISTORY IS INDEED A GREAT TEACHER .....
Billy's wife believes she talking to natives of Americas or she thinks she talking to Mr. Yeltsin. The World knows that Anglo-American alliance and satraps are hell bent on conquering Russia and STEALING her resources. They have already encircled China with rockets and are in process of encircling Russia as well. Their stated goal is "Full Spectrum Dominance" and a thousand years rule. Remember the last fellow who had similar objectives? I am sure Russian Political and Military leadership is aware of their TRUE aims. Their racism and condescension have no borders or limits.
"Every nation has to either be with us, or against us." -- Hillary Clinton
"Russia, who are you gonna believe? Me, or your lying eyes?" Hillary Clinton
Russis seems to act like they are dealing with Bill Clinton". This is not Bill, but Hillary, that you are questioning her good intentions. This woman may really believe that whatever Obama told her that she could say might just be the truth. She is in a tough job and is in way over her head, so take it a little easy on her and her boss. Perhaps in a few years they will start to improve unless they get us into a major war before they learn what they are doing. They are a product of the controlled news media and big money.
You, sure don't like my comments about that Clinton ! Sorry about that, I know her case better than you do...
Amusing, you publish a one line comment which mean nothing except the fact that you did not publish the previous ones which were not insolent or impolite, just the simple truth. Sometime RT make me wonder. Jean-Claude Meslin
Why don't you ask about NATO and its good intentions any Serb, or Abxazian or South Ossetian. Where was NATO then and why it’s different now? Just because they need that corridor from Russia to supply to Afghanistan doesn’t mean Russia should not consider NATO as threat and especially by its boarders.
Russia just doesn't seem to want to take a joke. Why is Russia so serious about this. If Russia is with us they could become one of NATO's states and help fight the bad dudes in CUBA and VENEZUELA. Either you are with us or you are against us, says the devil's advocate.
I would say Russia has every reason to be very wiry of NATO. NATO is nothing more than total world domination force. Let us look at why the US forces and NATO are in IRAQ, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Georgia, and other parts of the world. For control of the oil, the pipelines, mineral rights, drugs. America claims to have a war on drugs, but yet they use their troops in Afghanistan to guard opium fields, they attacked Iraq claiming weapons of mass destruction but yet none were found, we have the pipelines in Georgia and Afghanistan. And what is it that Russia has OIL and Minerals so yes I would say do not trust old Hilary Clinton nor the U.S. Federal government. They are claiming now that U.S. troop’s use of the internet is aiding the terrorist, this would be one of the federal government ploys to try and take away the American people’s right to freedom of speech under the Constitution, which the government takes an oath of office to uphold the constitution which America was founded on, and they clearly violate their oath of office, and commit treason with enacting a war without congressional approval. I would see the only terrorists that have struck America is the federal government of America. Clinton when he was under scrutiny Okayed the order for the Oklahoma bombing to divert attention away from him, and Bush with the military attack on the twin towers in New York along with the demolition of building 7. So I would say no to NATO which I feel should be abolished along with the United Nations. We the people of the world can respect each other’s views thoughts and religion’s, we can have free trade with each other without greed setting in. Our nations could and should work with each other in developing our world before the select few with their plans of mass domination destroy our world. We just need to open our eyes and see the truth unite and stand as one against the tyranny and corruption of the world banks and the leaders of these banks and their new world order.
Can she read - NATO is Russia's number one threat! Yes she wants to draw Russia and NATO closer. She wants NATO so close they are occupying Russia. Say neigh to NATO!