Medvedev might run for second term if plans work
Published: 24 June, 2010, 13:03
Edited: 30 June, 2010, 15:10
Dmitry Medvedev at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California (AFP Photo / Tony Avelar)
TAGS: Conflict, Election, Meeting, Medvedev, Georgia, Russia, Politics, Saakashvili, Law, Modernization, USA
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has announced that he may run in the 2012 presidential elections.
Speaking at a meeting with business and scientific circles in Stanford University on Thursday, he declared: “If the plans I formulated start implementing, if I have the support of our people… and if I have the desire to continue, then I do not rule this out.”
Medvedev stressed that the people’s support was a key factor “for any politician,” especially for one who may run for a second term. “It’s hard work to be a president,” he noted. “If someone is starting this job saying he is ready to work two or three terms, it might be that he is not fully prepared for this position,” Medvedev said.
Russia’s current president succeeded Vladimir Putin, who is now the prime minister, in 2008. Recent surveys show that if both politicians run, they have almost equal chances of becoming president in 2012.
Russia will continue to improve its political and legal system, Medvedev said at Stanford. Increasing the prestige of courts and establishing a working legal system which the people trust are among president’s most important tasks, he said. But the president added that Russia will be improving the political system on its own “without rebukes from abroad.”
At the same time, Medvedev stressed, Russia would be “a predictable international partner with a transparent and understandable foreign policy.” A firm approach in defending the country’s interests should be combined with “openness and readiness for compromises with those cooperating with us on the principles of equality and respect for international law,” he said.
Russia’s foreign policy should also ensure conditions to answer new challenges, using modern technological opportunities, the president noted. “Any resentment, including previous resentment, is a way to self-isolation,” he added.
Speaking about uneasy relations with Tbilisi, Medvedev said they might improve when Georgia gets a new leader. The Russian president described current relations between the two countries as “dramatically poor,” adding that he wanted them to return back to normal.
Moreover, Medvedev is sure this would happen, but he does not see “any chances for it with the incumbent president [Mikhail Saakashvili].” “As soon as Georgia gets a new leader we will have every opportunity to restore relations,” stated Medvedev. Russians and Georgians “lived together for centuries,” he added, noting that the two peoples were citizens of the same state for a long time.
Commenting later on Medvedev’s statements, Georgia's Foreign Minister Grigol Vashadze said “the Russian leadership will never like presidents of Georgia whoever occupies this position.” Since 1991, when Georgia proclaimed independence, “there has been no leadership in Georgia that could satisfy Russia,” Vashadze told journalists on Thursday. Georgia’s status as an independent country is “intolerable for Russia,” he said. And Georgia will never have authorities that do not defend “principles of independence, freedom and territorial integrity,” the minister noted.
Fact box
South Ossetia declared its independence from Georgia in 1990. In response, the Georgian authorities abolished the republic's autonomy. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Abkhazians fought a war for independence against Georgia in 1992-1993. After Georgia's aggression against South Ossetia in August 2008, Russia recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states.
Drastic political changes in Georgia are not expected any time soon. The next presidential election (in which Saakashvili has repeatedly stated that he is not planning to take part) should take place in 2013.
Sergey Borisov, RT
24.06.2010, 02:42
4 comments
Blagojevich saga continues as some pray he is innocentThe trial of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is now in full swing, though many in the court of public opinion have already convicted him. |
24.06.2010, 14:07
4 comments
The happy meal summitA quick bite at a burger joint with Barack Obama was the low-key highlight of Dmitry Medvedev's tour of the US this week. Medvedev-Obama |
PR101, Thank you. The process of step-by-step cooperation would be considered as the proper one, if we would have rational and stable environment for this. Meaning that all countries and their leader are sane and have good intentions. This is not the case, though. And Russia is still weak. And this is why big political games should be considered as well. Think about it, -- the American neocons are already assembling their forces to retake the power. For Russia it is better environment when Obama is in charge. It gives Russia so desperately needed time for reforms (primarily, military). But, Obama is in troubles and his days may be already counted. So, Russians need to provide help to Obama as soon as possible and as massive as possible. And, I believe, this is what Medevdev does.
Bogdanov I am not suggesting that Russia should not move closer to the U.S. Rather, I am suggesting that Russia should have used processes of step by step cooperation with the U.S based on concrete results. Let us take the epidemic issue of drug flow from Afghanistan to Russia. This is key security threat to Russia. I’ve watched the recent illegal drug trafficking conference in Moscow. The U.S and subservient organs, the UN and the EU, have scuttled most robust proposals from the Russian delegates on how to best tackle illegal drug trafficking flowing from NATO/US occupied Afghanistan to Russia, EU and central Asia. It is was excruciatingly painful to watch the U.S delegations insistence on “drug rehabilitation” and “social rehabilitation” in the case of Afghanistan drug problem. Read this against “the U.S war on illegal drugs” in Latin America. Can you explain to me why the Russian President cannot push this point more forcefully if the U.S really is honest about its so-called ‘reset’ with Russia? The bottom line is the U.S ruling elite still want to establish global dominance. Obama new security architect reaffirms this. Now, the primary objective for Russia should have been and still is to consolidate its own sphere of influence in the world and most of all in the former Soviet space.












Bogdanov We know what are Russia’s weaknesses. However, Russia does not need to allow itself to be boxed in by playing into the hands of the neocons. One of the immediate implications of the overplay of socalled the ‘reset’ is that it opens flood gates for the nations in former soviet space to make their own ‘reset’ with Washington! Russia has no way of offering better and bigger carrots when the U.S can just print money from nothing. This is one of the reasons Russia’s needs to mask its weaknesses and play up its strength. As for the neocons, I do think that Russia that is now under orchestrated charm offensive of the neocons. We can read between the lines and we can see how Russia’s stance to towards the Muslim world and the Middle East has been brought ever closely in line with the Washington consensus.