Mrs. Clinton “thinking forward not backward” together with Russia
Published: 10 May, 2009, 09:16
TAGS: Arms, Meeting, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Hillary Clinton, Politics, USA
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Friday May, 8. Both sides are for reducing nuclear warheads, but sore issues of NATO and missile defense stand in the way.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would like to push a different kind of button in the relations with Russia as she continues her meetings with Russian Foreign minister Sergey Lavrov.
“I have a great deal of respect and regard for my counterpart in Russia and for the Russian people, and for the kind of contribution that we can make together if we keep working with each other and we think forward, not backward. And that’s what we’re trying to do,” said Hillary Clinton.
And on top of the “to-do” list is cutting down on nukes.
“We have a lot to do in the field of nuclear nonproliferation. This is a field which is one of the most successful areas of our cooperation,” said Sergey Lavrov.
Hilary Clinton said that the two super-powers are doing their best to make the world safer.
“If you look at what we’re doing on START and nonproliferation, that has to do with the future safety of the world, and the United States and Russia bear a special responsibility. So we are working very hard together,” said Clinton.
“I can only add that the task of further reductions of strategic offensive weapons is too important, both for Russia and the United States, and for the entire world, in fact, to make it hostage of any particular regime anywhere around the globe,” added Sergey Lavrov.
And other tasks include addressing anti-ballistic missiles in Eastern Europe. Russia strongly opposes the U.S. depolying ABMs in Poland and the Czech Republic, so they came up with their own idea: use the Gabala and Armavir stations instead. And that proposal led U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller to recently drop her own bombshell:
“At the time I lived in Moscow when I was a director of Carnegie Moscow, I thought that the offer was very interesting. And I think it deserved further exploration. I understood from talking to Russian counterparts that the offer is still on the table. I think, personally, that is an offer that the United States should be willing to explore,” said Gottemoeller in the interview with Russia’s Interfax news agency.
The future of that missile defense shield is a cause of concern to both the U.S. and Russia, but experts say there is no need to fret just yet.
“Now President Obama is looking at the technical effect in this, and realizing that the systems just aren’t ready. He’s looking at the cost and realizing that this is very expensive at a time when we are having budget cuts, and he’s looking at a realistic assessment of the Iranian program which is still years away to any kind of serious threat to Europe or the United States,” says Joseph Cirincione, the President of Ploughshares Fund.
In a world of nuclear weaponry, anti-balistic missiles, and political strife it becomes crucial for these two nations to cooperate because if Russia and the United States do not find common ground, the rest of the world might feel the earth shake. And reconsidering policies from the past may create better relations in the future.
09.05.2009, 00:43
2 comments
“Soros’ institute was involved in revolutions in Ukraine, Georgia” – expertInvestigative journalist and columnist Wayne Madsen joins RT from Washington to share his ideas regarding an alleged plot against Barack Obama within NATO. |
11.05.2009, 11:31
1 comment
Does Obama recycle George W. Bush’s plans?What are the perspectives of NATO expansion? Is U.S. policy in Afghanistan escalating the war in the region? |












Forward is definitely the way to go, and of course is the only way to go. Russia and the US cooperating closely together is the only way to improve the safety and security of the world as a whole. Thsi cooperation is central to solving the big issues in this world, and quite frankly we need to get the big issues solved, without getting lost in a maze of minor issues. I am glad to see the 'to do' list, because it indicates priorities, and prioritisation, is what we need right now, moving forward. As is stated, this process can't be held up by regimes around the world which have an issue low on the list, that the US and Russia don't agree on. For me the top priorities are national security of Russia and the US.. This is the foundation stone of anything, get this wrong and any resulting building will soon collapse. Within this issue, is the sub issues of Nuclear offensive weapons, nuclear proliferation, AMD and conventional arms build ups, in border regions. Let's get these addressed in a pragmatic way, with both countries ensuring each others mutual national defence. It is a right of both sides to secure this for themselves and a duty on both sides to secure it for the other. Yes we don't trust the Americans and they don't trust us, that is the plain truth of where we are right now and will probably remain for my lifetime. But trust is something that is gained and earned, so for me this will take time, and is a purely natural process. We move step by step, just putting one foot in front of the other. Our combined histories, have ensured we understand each other better than others think, Clinton, no matter what people say has background, so does Gates on defence. We on our side also have very capable players Lavrov, Serdyukov .... so the team is in place to move forward. Onward we go!