VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   Naked truth behind ‘naked body scanners’  

Naked truth behind ‘naked body scanners’

Published: 16 November, 2010, 22:51

(13.2Mb) embed video

TAGS: SciTech, Politics, Law, Mass media, USA


John Tyner, a California man, became a national sensation when he recorded his encounter during an airport security pat-down. After the exchange, Tyner uploaded the video to the web and shortly after – it went viral.

"We can do that out here, but if you touch my junk I am going to have you arrested," Tyner told the airport security official.

The US media has had a field day, reporting the pros and cons of body scanning machines and pat-downs in the name of security. But one question they failed to ask is: who is behind the push for the body scanners?

As it turns out, former Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, now runs a security and risk management firm and one of his clients is Rapiscan, one of the biggest manufacturers of body scanning machines in the country. While the media continues to interview Chertoff about the value of body scanning machines, they fail to point out that he will benefit financially from the implementation of the machines.

"He’s abusing his relationship with the public by pretending to be a public servant and talking about how these body scanners are going to make us safer… He stands to benefit because he's getting paid by the manufacturing companies to go all over the television networks saying that these scanners are the solution to security," said Kate Hanni, the director of Flyersrights.org, a non-profit dedicated to passengers rights.

Talk about body scanners became increasingly popular after the failed Christmas Day bombing last year. After that incident, two major contractors with powerful lobbying groups in Washington, DC recieved contracts for about $160 million dollars each to build body scanners for airports across the country. One of those contractors was Rapiscan.

"Americans should be angry because the $25 million in stimulus funds that were used to order the first 150 of these body scanners could have been used to create jobs. The taxpayers could have avoided what’s akin to martial law being implemented in the airport," Hanni said.

+31 (37 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
16.11.2010, 09:20 4 comments

Viktor Bout extradited to USA

Viktor Bout has landed in the US in the late evening on Tuesday, according to US Law-Enforcment forces, as quoted by AP.

Viktor Bout case
17.11.2010, 03:23 4 comments

American Neocons down, but not out

Their hawkish policies and sky-high defense spending may have cost them the White House and Congress in 2008, but the neoconservatives are not done.

John December 02, 2010, 23:52
+2

How easily are freedoms surrendered to the security industry.  If the US government really wants to protect lives, it would do so more effectively by spending some money on road safety measures.

Carl Anthony November 24, 2010, 00:26
+2

Journalists in the US and UK used to follow the story by following the money, or who benefits.  Well, in the mid-90's "managers" moved in to BBC and ITN and many good story-chasing journalists and editors were booted-out (I had friends working at the BBC at that time and I worked within LWT, London Weekend TV).  If there were still journalists that were able to follow the money, former Homeland Security supremo, Michael Chertoff, and former head of the C.I.A. George Tenet, now heads of "The Chertoff Group", would be tracked as having benefited massively from full body scanners. Why? Well, The Chertoff Group makes the full body scanners. It , therefore, benefits from every terror threat that leads to more airports buying these 150,000 Dollar items. 

StanSki November 22, 2010, 23:20
+4

Let's not forget that even when heading the DHS, Chertoff (which means 'Devil' in Russian) was and is a duel citizen of Israel and the U.S. In fact, many top positions have been occupied by "dual citizen Israelis" over the last few years. As jews, their main aligence is to Israel, then the U.S. This is by no means what the Founders of this country intended.