VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   NATO war in Libya still run by America  
MORE ON THE STORY
AFP Photo Adjudant Nicolas Nelson Richard / ECPAD 25.03.2011, 23:54 2 comments

Libya war continues amid uncertainty

NATO agreed to take command of the Libyan no-fly zone, but has not accepted full military control of the Libyan war.

AFP Photo / Aris Messinis 25.03.2011, 23:56 3 comments

War Stories: Promoting the war in Libya

The Pentagon, NATO, and others fight an information war to go alongside the real ones in the battlefield. This was is to sell the reality of a conflict where people are dying and billions are being spent to a public back home.

Crew members stand on the deck of the USS Bataan (rear) as tug boatS push her away from the dock to lead the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group out of the Norfolk, Virgina, US Naval Base, March 23, 2011, enroute to waters off Libya (AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards) 24.03.2011, 18:00 5 comments

Congress drafts bill to defund Libya war

Members of the US congress are looking into the possibility of pulling the US out of Libya by preventing US President Barack Obama from spending any money on the operation.

AFP Photo / Marina Passos 24.03.2011, 00:24 7 comments

Israel bombing, Libyan intervention: Signs of WWIII?

As conflict continues in Libya and unrest in the Middle East continues to spread, sparking fresh bombings in Jerusalem, is the world nearing yet another world war?

Arab world protests
Demonstrators march in front of the White House 24 March, 1999, after the start of aerial bombing on Yugoslavia by US-led NATO forces (AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards) 24.03.2011, 21:18 4 comments

Yugoslavia anniversary highlights parallels with Libya

In March the seasons change and sunshine falls on America. In March American politicians venture to foreign counties – to drop bombs.

A US Navy F-16 fighter jet based at Sigonella airbase on the Italian island of Sicily takes off on March 21, 2011 to take part in operations in Libya. 22.03.2011, 23:35 11 comments

Americans disagree on US involvement in Libya

As coalition forces continue airstrikes in Libya, Americans react to the US’s involvement right from the heart of Washington DC.

Arab world protests
Moammar Ghadafi 21.03.2011, 23:32 14 comments

America’s presidents quick to go to war

It’s become an unspoken addendum to the job description: become President of the United States. Declare war – somewhere, somehow.

US President Barack Obama (AFP Photo / Jim Watson) 21.03.2011, 18:01 26 comments

Congress angered by Obama’s war in Libya

As the US President wages war in Libya, Congress feels left out and uninformed. Angry with Obama many are questioning the legality of the unilateral action by the Executive Branch of the US government.

Libyan rebels waving their flag on top of a wrecked tank belonging to Gaddafi's forces on the western entrance of Benghazi on March 20, 2011 (AFP Photo / Patrick Baz) 22.03.2011, 08:57 22 comments

Libya torn to pieces by rebels, Gaddafi and coalition – all for peace

Latest coalition air-strikes hit two Libyan naval bases and two airports, including a civilian airport in the city of Sert. As the operation unfolds, rebels have reinforced their efforts to recover the territory they have lost to Gaddafi’s forces.

Arab world protests Libyan conflict
Libya, Tripoli: People mill around near Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi's residence after a missile totally destroyed an administrative building in the Libyan leader's complex in Tripoli on March 20, 2011. (AFP Photo / Imed Lamloum) 21.03.2011, 09:08 15 comments

Coalition forces strike Gaddafi compound

A command post also used as one of the private residences of the embattled Libyan leader has been completely destroyed as a result of an air strike by the coalition forces late on Sunday.

Arab world protests Libyan conflict

NATO war in Libya still run by America

Published: 29 March, 2011, 00:28

Smoke billows as Libyan rebels progress westward from the town of Bin Jawad towards Moamer Kadhafi's home town of Sirte on March 28, 2011

(39.8Mb) embed video

TAGS: Military, NATO, UN, Politics, USA, Libya


NATO has agreed to take over all military operations in Libya, taking command away from the Pentagon – or have they? Critics claim America is still in control.

Journalist Pepe Escobar from the Asia Times said although NATO has taken control, America is still in control to an extent.

This is an enormous enterprise built on lies,” he said.

He argued that papers leaked by Italian intelligence eluded o a planned French operation where the French propped up rebellion in Libya in order to set up for an intervention and invasion. This is why France too the lead and was the first to recognize the rebels and call for intervention. France and the US are strong allies.

Now, with the US involved in the intervention, the US and the UN are supporting and fighting alongside the rebels – who are al-Qaeda, Escobar argued. It is all part of the agenda of global humanitarian imperialists.

To sum it all up, it’s still an American war,” he argued. “NATO is basically the Pentagon.”

Escobar said NATO with UN authority takes American orders, no matter what. The Pentagon is still in charge. Even the commanding general, who is Canadian, will take orders from American, he argued.

Nobody trusts the UN anymore,” he commented. “Everybody knows that NATO is the UN’s armed body.”

Moving forward, America’s new NATO branded war in Libya is just another American intervention under the guise of humanitarianism with an imperialist agenda.

There is no end game, there is no end in sight,” he added. “Nobody knows where this thing could go. It could become a new Afghanistan.”

+6 (6 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
Los Angeles, USA 28.03.2011, 23:37 4 comments

Main Street America is rising up

Drawing their inspiration from Egypt and Wisconsin, nearly 10,000 union supporters clogged the streets of Los Angeles to let it be known they will not stand for what they call an attack on the middle class.

Protesters burn a replica of the US flag in Manila  on March 20, 2011 to condemn what they call a US-led international military intervention in Libya 29.03.2011, 01:08 2 comments

Odyssey Dawn: America’s epic Libyan intervention

With conflict continuing to unfold in Libya, and American involvement also continuing, the question on the minds of many is – just how limited will this limited intervention be?

Arab world protests
Jamal Khanfer May 02, 2011, 21:02
0

Indeed and very briefly:

no evidence of intense continuous bombing of Libyan towns, yet great deal of damage is shown to army equipment. This could because NATO are bombing the army indiscriminately. The so called Libyan revolution erupted within minutes and became well armed simply walking in to military basis and taking over, this can’t be by armless civilians, the stage was well set in advance. All picture on TV show the revolution fierce firing from numerous weaponry such anti-aircraft, multi rocket launchers, surely if the army was firing the same together with SSKUD and GRAD missiles the TV camera would have picked up evidence of such shelling in the air and on the ground.  

WB May 02, 2011, 02:34
0

And Russia and China are complicit too; they can't just rest on a phony abstention. What nauseating pretense on their respective parts! What the U.S. has done, under the pretense of NATO cover, is nothing short of state sanctioned MURDER, the moral equivalent of domestic terrorism and murder by organised crime. And the United Nations? A TOOL of the permanent members of the security council whose aims are obviously naked aggression, domination, manipulation, and imperialism--RUSSIA AND CHINA INCLUDED FOR DOING NOTHING! A war crimes tribunal needs to be immediately convened to hold those responsible for the extension of the brutual Libya War beyond the noflyzone artifice. SHAME ON NATO, CHINA, AND RUSSIA.

Wilson Boozer March 30, 2011, 13:32
0

  The American people and press went along with the condemnation of Russia during the war in 2008, when Russian troops were seeking to protect their own citizens against attack by Georgia in South Ossetia. What a remarkably malleable bunch the American public is!