VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   What’s next for the US war in Afghanistan?   Comments  
MORE ON THE STORY
Afghanistan, Kabul : Afghanistan-based Polish soldiers at Kabul International Airport on April 11, 2010. (AFP Photo / Shah Marai) 02.09.2010, 22:00 4 comments

Poland wants to start pulling troops out of Afghanistan

Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski has complained that the mission in Afghanistan costs Poland $1 billion annually, and asked NATO to define plans to start withdrawing soldiers from Afghanistan as soon as possible.

07.09.2010, 08:44 5 comments

First Georgian casualty in Afghanistan sparks debate in Tbilisi

The international death toll in Afghanistan is on the rise – and not only for US-led NATO forces. Georgia has lost its first soldier to the war, but the country isn't even part of the Alliance.

06.10.2010, 17:57 3 comments

Coalition forces reportedly in peace talks with Taliban

Reports in the US suggest the Afghan government has begun high-level peace talks with the Taliban.

20.05.2010, 03:59 1 comment

Taliban militants attack Bagram air base

Bagram air base, once considered themost secure place for Americans in Afghanistan, was attacked by Taliban militants on May 19. The attack killed a US contractor, 10 militants and wounded nine American soldiers.

Afghanistan, Arghandab: US soldiers enter an anti-mortar attack shelter inside a fortified US base in Kandahar province's Arghandab Valley on August 11, 2010. The number of civilian casualties in the Afghan war rose by a third in the first six months of 2010, with insurgents killing seven times more civilians than NATO-led troops, a UN report said August 10. (AFP Photo / Yuri Cortez) 03.09.2010, 03:27 1 comment

Afghan civilian casualties increase under Petraeus

United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is flying to Afghanistan to meet with Afghan President Hamid Karzai to discuss a NATO airstrike that killed 10 civilians.

Afghanistan, Kabul : Afghan police run past a fire as they chase anti-US demonstrators during riots in the west of capital Kabul on September 15, 2010. (AFP Photo / Massoud Hossaini) 16.09.2010, 01:31

US, Afghan troops push into Taliban stronghold

American and Afghan forces pushed into the region west of Kandahar, where the Taliban Movement was born and continues to dominate the region.

18.02.2009, 15:46 2 comments

US and Russia: future partners in Afghanistan?

Sooner or later, the new US administration will consider Russia as an equal partner in rebuilding and restoring Afghanistan, says RT military analyst Eugene Khrushchev.

24.08.2010, 03:45

Pakistan playing both sides of Afghan conflict

Pakistani officials have admitted that the capture of a high ranking Taliban operative was a direct attempt to impact negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban.

09.09.2010, 02:16

Britain's envoy to Afghanistan steps down

Britain's special envoy to Afghanistan, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, steps down from his position, amid speculation he was driven out because of his continued criticism of the military campaign.

16.02.2009, 18:43

Revolutionary road: America’s new route to Afghanistan

The first American non-military cargo to Afghanistan is being put together in Riga, Latvia. The Russian Foreign Ministry says that the freight will be sent to Afghanistan through the Russian territory shortly.

What’s next for the US war in Afghanistan?

Published: 26 June, 2010, 02:54
Edited: 26 June, 2010, 22:52


A Marine from 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, ground guides a vehicle into position near a temporary observation post in Southern Shorshork, Helmand province, Afghanistan, during the first day of Operation Cobra, June 16. (1st Marine Division Public Affairs / Photo by Sgt. Mark Fayloga)

Many are wondering how the switch from Gen. McChrystal to Gen. Petraeus will affect the policy and strategy in Afghanistan.

 
3 COMMENTS
Count Cash June 26, 2010, 10:37 quote
0

The normal advice is, when in a hole, stop digging! So what is next; more war, more deaths, both military and civilian, more corruption, more drugs, more dysfunctional government, more foreign influence and intervention (Read just about everyone, for a bit of the cash action and Iran and Pakistan for the political action). It's an absolute mess, a self made quagmire. More importantly, what will be the outcome and when. Well I suppose if the US put nearly all their military resources in, attacked all the countries that help support this mess from the other side (who complement the western forces causing the mess from the western side). Then after a mega regional war, you may just get a state of imperial control that would calm things down. But there are some downsides and risks here. Maybe it could even get bigger, and the game is totally lost from a western perspective - China town USA. But the US is smarter than that (I hope!), so probably it will be a face saving effort of train and contain. Basically train the Afghans to look after themselves in the western created mess, and leave it be. Then contain any Afghan originated global terrorist exports. that have been innovatively developed alongside drugs by the west. The Opium Valley and Terrorist Valley approach. Basically control the movement of people and materials and keep on Bombing from outside any increasing threats. But the train and contain needs something to make it work, and that something is cooperation with the rest of the world, and a movement away from the go it alone policy previously followed. None of this is a bad thing, it builds a true consistent policy in the world and ends western hyocrisy, as the west is forced to call all terrorists, terrorists, there is no good one. It also leaves Afghanistan sort itself out, acknowledging that the west, created many of those problems. But the creator of the problem, is not the right solver, because of mindset, everyone knows that.

Kihnu June 26, 2010, 14:08 quote
0

An immediate change will be a rapid rise in the death and maiming of Afghan men, women and children as the Americans now raze Afghani villages to the ground in order not to "lose the war".

Kihnu June 26, 2010, 22:25 quote
0

American military often claims that the reason they lost the Vietnam war was because they were not as brutal as they should have been with the Vietnamese people. The American military is now adamant that this mistake will not be repeated in Afghanistan. I expect the Americans will end up killing millions of Afghans in their scorched earth to stave off defeat. The Germans tries these scorched earth tactics during their occupation of Russia and failed. Now, the Americans want to set the record straight that if a foreign invader kills the occupied people without conscience of guilt, victory is sure to follow. We will see how successful the Americans will be in this bloody affair.

POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image