Thorium - the safer nuclear power?
Published: 01 November, 2011, 01:41
Edited: 01 November, 2011, 16:34
TAGS: Natural resources, Nuclear, Russia, USA, Innovation
Solar, wind, and biomass have been touted as viable alternative energy sources to fossil fuels. But what if there is a nuclear energy source that is safe, green, and abundant? Thorium could be that source.
Lightbridge, based in Virginia, is now testing this next generation nuclear fuel in Russia.
“It dramatically reduces the amount of waste in the reactor, reduces the toxicity of the waste coming out of the reactor, and doesn't produce any weapons usable materials,” says Seth Grae, president and CEO of Lightbridge.
It’s estimated that Thorium is three times more abundant than uranium, the element currently used in nuclear plants.Scientists say there is so much of it, that it can produce energy than all of the world’s oil, coal, and uranium combined. Sounds like the alternative energy source the world needs. But despite its advantages, nuclear experts say politics and corporate interests may be getting in the way.
“That doesn't mean that it's going to be picked up by the utilities and implemented.They're going to look at the economics and not the environmental benefits,” says Thomas Cochran, Director attheNatural Resources Defense Council.
Cochran says the U.S. needs to change its energy policies in order to make Thorium more attractive to businesses.
“They would have to have a different fee structure than the current one to encourage the development of thorium fuels,” Chochran says.
President Obama has vowed to transition the nation to alternative energy. With testing underway in Russia, China, and India, the United States may lose the race and find itself behind the curve when it comes to energy innovation and the jobs it may create.
“I think in the coming years, you'll start to see more testing, more results, and more industry interests. But I think most of the industry interest in using Thorium in reactors is from outside the U.S.,” says Grae.
31.10.2011, 23:52
9 comments
Anonymous goes after deadly Mexican drug cartelIn an attempt to save one of its own, the hackivist group, Anonymous threatens one of most notorious Mexican drug cartels, Los Zetas. |
01.11.2011, 01:52
13 comments
Was Rick Perry drunk or on drugs during his latest speech? (VIDEO)Rick Perry’s latest speech in New Hampshire was more of a cross between a Zach Galifianakis show and a Carrot Top act than an actual speech. US Election 2012 |
Marco, compared with Thorium there are many more hazardous substances. We all breathe in a lot of benzene from petroleum . Benzene is a known carcinogen and hexane - a major component in petrol causes damage to the liver through its metabolites. Oils and hydrocarbon wastes invariably leave PAH residues and we are exposed to them too. Thorium produces far, far fewer radioactive byproducts than does uranium or plutonium and wont undergo runaway meltdown should a reactor experience difficulties There is a need to contain thorium and the related materials and this process should be far simpler.
It is the fact that the byproducts are not readily converted into weapons that makes this a desirable process from the viewpoint of the international community. Having said that I am sure that some countries will be raising ridiculous objections for the simple reason that given the relatively greater abundance and location of the ores, that current world powers will not be able to dictate policy, or influence governments.







"[Thorium] is unlikely to be commercially available for at least another 50 -100 years, long after we will have needed to transition to alternative energy sources. By contrast, wind and solar power are available today, [and] will last indefinitely."
Future solutions for the problems of today basically.