VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   Race to reset: Moscow and Washington rush to beat arms treaty deadline  
MORE ON THE STORY
30.10.2009, 17:01

Moscow and Washington scramble to reset START

Russian and US diplomats are working feverishly to draft a document to replace START-1, set to expire on December 5, just five days before the US president is to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.

Medvedev-Obama
Sergey Lavrov 16.10.2009, 21:48 10 comments

“Russia needs more clarity on US missile defense plans” – Lavrov

Russia is awaiting more information from the US on their plans to build an alternative missile defense system by 2018, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

29.07.2010, 17:17 6 comments

Politics as usual may delay US Senate vote on New START

Following the release of the Treaty Compliance Report in the US, some Senate members are arguing that Russia did not fulfill its START I obligations, which could hinder New START.

Medvedev-Obama
United States, Washington : US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Admiral Mike Mullen. (AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards) 02.08.2010, 23:45 21 comments

America’s man with a plan for Iran

The highest-ranking US military officer says America has a plan for thwarting Iran’s nuclear ambitions, while admitting that such a strike would “endanger the security of the region.”

Medvedev-Obama
Chinese President Hu Jintao (R) gestures the way forward for visiting Dmitry Medvedev (L) during a welcoming ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on September 27, 2010 (AFP Photo / Frederic J. Brown) 27.09.2010, 15:11 1 comment

Medvedev seeks hi-tech partnership in China

Russian oil will be pumped to China by next year. President Dmitry Medvedev have taken part in the opening of the new pipeline from Russia with Chinese leader Hu Jintao while visiting the country.

01.12.2009, 05:42

Obama and Medvedev START talking

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and US President Barack Obama talked by phone about key political issues, including Afghanistan and START. Obama also expressed his condolences on the deadly train crash.

Medvedev-Obama
25.06.2009, 05:50 15 comments

US Congress wants to be “best friends” with Russia

With just two weeks to go before President Obama's visit to Moscow, nuclear disarmament is the hot topic in the US Congress, as Russia and America have only six months left to reach a compromise on a new weapons treaty.

Medvedev-Obama
19.11.2010, 13:33 14 comments

Russia-NATO relationship is one-way traffic

What does NATO offer Russia, and what does Russia get in reality? Would Russia be willing to help NATO stay afloat by participating in its projects? What is the price of improving relations with its Western partners?

RT Politics Interview Russia-NATO relations
14.11.2009, 03:54 11 comments

“Deep nuke cuts impossible unless other nuclear states join US and Russia”

Russia and the US are negotiating a new nuke reduction treaty. But it’s necessary that other nuclear states get involved in such talks, the Director of the Nuclear Information Project, Hans Kristensen, told RT.

Medvedev-Obama
22.01.2010, 18:28 12 comments

Patriot Games: Poland playing on Russia’s nerves over missiles

In response to Warsaw’s recent announcement that it will base US Patriot missiles near the border with Kaliningrad, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow needs more information.

Medvedev-Obama

Race to reset: Moscow and Washington rush to beat arms treaty deadline

Published: 09 November, 2009, 16:38
Edited: 11 November, 2009, 10:10

Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) being launched at the Pacific Missile Range Facility off the island of Kauai in Hawaii (AFP Photo / HO / US Missile Defense Agency)

Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) being launched at the Pacific Missile Range Facility off the island of Kauai in Hawaii (AFP Photo / HO / US Missile Defense Agency)

TRENDS: Medvedev-Obama

TAGS: Arms, Nuclear, Medvedev, Russia, Obama, USA, Robert Bridge


US and Russian officials are meeting in Geneva today to hammer out the details on a new agreement to replace the START-1 treaty – but time is running out.

The closed-door talks represent the eighth round of consultations between US and Russian delegates, who are working against the clock to come up with a document to replace the START-1 Treaty that is set to expire on December 5, 2009.

START-1 was signed in 1991 by the United States and Russia. The treaty obliges both sides to reduce their nuclear warheads to 6,000 and delivery systems to 1,600.

The Russian delegation is being headed by Anatoly Antonov, Director of the Foreign Ministry Department for Security and Disarmament, while Rose Gottemoeller, the US Assistant Secretary of State, heads the American delegation.

The United States and Russia own 95 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons, and politicians from both sides are anxious to set an example to the world that nuclear proliferation can be stopped.

A memorandum was signed by Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow on July 6, 2009, which is set to reduce the number of deployed warheads on each side to 1,500–1,675 and 500–1,100 for delivery systems.

But the clock is ticking fast, yet officials on both sides of the negotiating table seem positive that the delegates have enough time to draft a new treaty before the December 5 expiration date on the old treaty.

“The Russian-US talks have been proceeding almost continuously,” Andrey Nesterenko, the spokesman of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs told reporters on Friday. “On Monday… the next, eighth round will begin in Geneva. We hope that it will be the final round, and that by December 5 a new treaty will have been agreed upon.”

Nesterenko then said that progress was being made, but further details could not be provided due to the “confidentiality” of the talks.

“Progress is there," the MFA spokesman said. “But I am not going to disclose the contents of the ongoing discussions right now, because we agreed from the outset with the American partners to observe confidentiality. I think you well understand the reasons. I am referring to the specificity of the issues being discussed.”

Suspicions remain

Although Nesterenko made no mention of the Bush-era missile defense system planned for Poland and the Czech Republic, which Moscow said was a direct threat to its national security, it is certain that that issue has consumed a large part of the ongoing negotiations.

After announcing the scrapping of the missile defense program, which envisioned a battery of missiles in Poland and a radar station in the Czech Republic, Obama announced plans for a “new approach” to handling theoretical future threats to Eastern Europe, specifically by deploying interceptor missiles on ships.

In September, Obama’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates (who, somewhat strangely, served in the very same position under George W. Bush) described America’s new plans for missile defense in Europe, which certainly has no small bearing on the Geneva talks.

“In the first phase, to be completed by 2011, we will deploy proven, sea-based SM-2 interceptor missiles – weapons that are growing in capability – in the areas where we see the greatest threat to Europe,” Gates wrote in an op-ed piece in The New York Times.

“The second phase, which will become operational around 2015, will involve putting upgraded SM-3s on the ground in Southern and Central Europe,” Gates continued. “All told, every phase of this plan will include scores of SM-3 missiles, as opposed to the old plan of just 10 ground-based interceptors.”

Given Gates's enthusiasm for the new system, is it any wonder that Moscow is demanding that an updated START treaty include direct links to any US missile defense system in Europe?

The United States has remained elusive about how the new system will work.

“The US has dropped its missile defense plans [for Central Europe], and developed an alternative system that would not create problems in its first phase,” Lavrov recently told RT and other media in an exclusive interview. “But we would like more details on further stages.”

During her visit to Moscow in October, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expressed confidence that Moscow and Washington could work out a joint cooperation on missile defense in order to protect Europe from any external threats.

“We are very interested in working with Russia to develop cooperation, including a joint threat assessment and intensified efforts to establish a joint data exchange center, as our presidents agreed to in July, as a means of making missile defense a common enterprise against what we believe are increasingly common threats,” Clinton said.

Robert Bridge, RT

+4 (6 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
US Army's Patriot Surface (AFP Photo / Kim Jae-Hwan) 09.11.2009, 13:38 4 comments

US to send $100M worth of weapons to Georgia – intelligence

The US has offered to sell Georgia up to $100 million worth of weapons, which would include, among others, a sophisticated air defense system, small arms and ammunition, according to Russian security services

Russian Federation, Moscow: Portraits of US President Barack Obama (L) and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (C) near a Soviet hammer and sickle symbol (R) are seen on Russian matryoshka nesting dolls in Moscow on May 20, 2009. (AFP PHOTO / OXANA ONIPKO) 10.11.2009, 02:17 1 comment

“Russian and US both have huge interest in signaling the Cold War is over”

A new arms reduction treaty set to replace START is of equal importance for both Russia and US, says Hans Kristensen from the Nuclear Information Project. But Russia has its particular interest in it, he told RT.

treaties November 11, 2009, 03:19
0

Treaties are not worth the paper they are written on. It is all about GRAND STANDING BY POLITICIANS to improve their stature and enlarge their huge ego. After the big show is over, each side goes ahead and does what they want to anyway. It does help a politician who is up for reelection. Both sides kind of set up the photo opportunities and news manipulation to better their political careers. Both sides are usually more concerned with self than the people they are supposedly representing. With all the fanfaire it all becomes more a farce than an honest endeavor. Welcome to the real world.

F November 09, 2009, 16:20
0

Does anyone really believe that these two countries will get rid of any of their nuclear weapons. These are the two countries in the world who crave power. You cannot trust either one to do what they say.