Russia's new security strategy: sleeker and stronger
Published: 13 May, 2009, 15:47
TAGS: Conflict, NATO, Russia, Politics, USA
Dmitry Medvedev has signed the final version of Russia’s new security strategy. While it focuses on economic development and people’s welfare, the document has some harsh words for US policy and NATO.
In the overview of national defense, the strategy names as a threat the “policy of some leading countries, aimed at military supremacy” by building up nuclear and conventional strategic arms, unilateral development of anti-ballistic missile defense and militarization of space. The policy “may trigger a new arms race,” the document warns.
While Russia is not going to waste money on stockpiling its arsenals, it will “act in a least costly manner to keep party with the United States of America in terms of strategic weapons,” to counter the ABM system and take into account the global strike concept in the US military doctrine. The latter refers to the stated ability of US forces to strike at any target in the world in a matter of half a day.
In practical terms the new strategy means that Russia will keep its nuclear forces at a high degree of readiness, while continuing with its military reform, which will see Russian troop numbers reduced and transformed into an instrument of solving regional conflicts.
Sergey Seliverstov,
Security expert, deputy director of the Institute of Economics
The new national strategy dismisses NATO’s expansion plans and ‘attempts to assume global functions’ as unacceptable to Russia. It says the relations with the North-Atlantic alliance will be determined by its willingness to “take into account Russia’s lawful interests,” “to respect international law” and its reform, which will help the bloc find a new mission and humanitarian functions.
Mikhail Margelov,
Chairman of Russian Parliament’s Commission of international relations
The document says Russia will modernize its border troops to be prepared for possible military conflicts and to prevent crimes like trafficking of drugs, weapons and human beings, smuggling and poaching. Borders with Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Georgia and Azerbaijan as well as regions of the Arctic, the Caspian Sea and the Far East require special attention.
Nikolay Patrushev,
Secretary of Russia’s Security Council
On the economic side, the main challenges are the export nature of Russia’s industry, its overt dependence on global markets, labor inefficiency, vulnerable financial system and corruption. The document suggests focusing on state-private partnership in key industries, support high-tech projects, facilitate trade for Russian producers and fight corruption. The goal is to become the fifth country in the world in terms of GDP.
Among other threats to Russia’s national security the strategy names: global financial crises, which “may have a devastating effect comparable to the large-scale use of military force”; terrorism and extremism; social injustice; epidemics and socially dangerous decease like tuberculosis; a lack of domestically produced food and medicine; the industrial impact on Russia’s environment, and cybercrime.
Viktor Zavarzin,
Chairman of the Russian Parliament’s Committee on defense
National Security Strategy 2020
The document outlining Russia’s policy in security until 2020 replaces the 1997 paper, which was outdated, according to many experts. The work on it started in September 2008, shortly after the conflict in South Ossetia, and was finished by the end of March this year. Some media speculated that the signing of the document was postponed until Dmitry Medvedev’s meeting with Barack Obama in April and said the ‘anti-American’ statements in it may have been changed after it.
One of the key differences of the new strategy is the list of indicators, which are to show how secure Russia is. These include the unemployment level, inflation, the disproportion of people’s incomes, national debt and others.
US looking to boost military funding for ‘right war’The US Congress is expected to pass an emergency bill on funding for the military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. |
13.05.2009, 17:21
8 comments
“Ivan the Terrible” trial: now it’s Germany’s turnIvan Demjanjuk, accused of being involved in the murder of some 29,000 Jews in a Nazi death camp during the Second World War, has been deported from the US to Germany. But was it really him who was behind the crimes? |
Great article ! Pity that there is not word about SCO role in future security of Russia.
That document shows Russia doesnt idealize the west anymore, which is good. No more surprises like 22.6.41. NATO is a stinking corpse of the cold war more than ever. EU & NATO is again trying to get their hands on what is not theirs. Their hypocrisy lies in calling Russia imperial, while calling itself democratic. The latest development in EU only shows they want to jump on the already sinking Titanic and want to interfere in regions far from North Atlantic. Brussels reduction of national sovereignity will try to make it a new multinational state with western elite dominating. Central European states just shifted from one empire to another, it didnt even take long. West is also trying to accuse Russia of dividing and controlling eastern part of EU. But what EU did with our economy...agriculture. I believe sometimes Russia should use the´ideological´blaming of EU. It promotes centralism, ordinary people have totally no idea what is going on in Brusel and get no reports about it. Media fail here to inform people objectively. In my opinion, the democracy of the EU will go on Saak´s path, which will fundamentally destroy it. Then Russia may come and stabilize the region :-D to restore the order. When Titanic is sunk, then Russia can become one again reuniting Belarus, Ukraine.












I agree with you all and i'd like add:Criminal attack on Serbia (when the NATO take off the mask and show real face) mark a turning point in Russia foreign policy and also beginning of the end for USA (NATO).They did not hear Russia advice.. USA did flight high and" forget" that 15 millions brave Russians in history die for free Serbia. Attack on Serbia was attack on Russian soul.What a mistake! What a blunder!.From that date Russia work on all fronts(economy,politics,,nuclear technology,military, etc) to put the rope around their neck -till the very end-no matter how long will take. Georgia (last year) is clear sign and it will be more to come.