The Untouchables: Sex offenders hope for a new start
Published: 09 July, 2010, 00:06
Edited: 05 August, 2010, 03:37
TAGS: Children, Crime, Law, Sex, USA
Even after they have paid their debt to society, sex offenders are far from free. Legislation intended to keep them away from children affects their lives in unintended ways.
This is part two of an in-depth report on the lives of sex offenders after they have served their sentences.
Larry Tyler's victim was 14 years-old when—according to him—he simply put his hand on her vagina. He was 39.
Kevin Morales demanded a sexual favor from his victim. She was a family member.
Terry Norton kissed a neighbor “on her private part". They were drunk at a Christmas party. He woke up the next morning and she was gone. He says he got a phone call from her demanding that he give her his Corvette.
They live under Miami's Julia Tuttle Causeway, because that’s the law.
Book’s story explains why began the residency law campaign in the first place. For nearly six years, his daughter, Lauren, was molested by a live-in nanny. She's now in prison. His case reads like that of a father protecting his daughter, and it’s possible to argue that the sex offender laws are all simply a case of parents protecting their children.
But this is where the story gets much more complicated.
Ron Book says the stricter residency restrictions work. According to him, sex offender registration is up in Miami and absconding is down, as is the number of sex abuse crimes against children is down.
But the Florida chapter of the ACLU disagrees, saying that residency restrictions are too strict. The ACLU argues that because the laws force sex offenders to live in the hell that is the Julia Tuttle Causeway, many sex offenders won't register themselves and, consequently, don't end up living underneath the Causeway. Where they do live is an unanswerable question because they could be anywhere, hidden from the law. They could even be near a school, playground, park or church, and no one would know it.
Just about everyone also agrees the definition of the term "sex offender" is much too broad under Florida state laws. Certainly some sex offenders fit the stereotype and some have done horrible things. But there are also 18-year-old guys who have sex with their 17-year-old girlfriends. There are men who urinated in public. There are women who streak across parks or stadiums. Should they all be forced to live with the restrictions required under Florida sex offender laws?
There are, however, other places sex offenders can live in Miami-Dade County—exclusive, extravagant, gated communities that are nowhere near any place children could be. But few sex offenders can afford to live in those communities. Few of them can even get jobs.
And this is where a man named Randy Young steps in. Young finds places throughout the Sunshine State where sex offenders can live, but in south Florida, the most likely place is Fort Lauderdale. Housing prices there have tumbled dramatically in the past few years and although the area has a residency restriction, it is only 1,400 feet.
But that doesn't mean the work of finding homes and dignity for just-released sex offenders is an easy. The moment the neighbors find out Young is planning to lease homes in their area to convicted sex offenders, they are up in arms. Sometimes prospective home sellers balk, too. Young has found, however, that money talks in an economy as down as that in south Florida.
Home sellers, finding no legitimate buyer any time soon, are grudgingly taking Young's offers. In some cases, sellers are even asking Young if he'd like to lease out their properties to other sex offenders. These sellers believe that sex offenders will not break the law again once placed in a neighborhood, where they live under a microscope by the law. Ironically, sometimes the presence of sex offenders in the neighborhood even makes it safer, by bringing in an increased police presence.
In the meantime, the ranks of convicted sex offenders living underneath the Julia Tuttle Causeway have thinned considerably. Only about a dozen of them remain. In addition to the ones resettled by Randy Young, others have been relocated temporarily by various charitable organizations and local governments who considered Sex Offender City to be an anathema to the city. In another twist, Ron Book helped with their temporary housing—in addition to being a lobbyist, he is also the director of Miami's homeless trust.
But these solutions are only temporary ones. The larger problem of what to do with sex offenders who have served their time remains unsolved.
08.07.2010, 15:56
8 comments
Spying scientist Sutyagin allegedly exchanged for femme-fatale ChapmanRussia and the US have agreed to a spy swap – alleged femme-fatale spy Anna Chapman is returning home in exchange for Russian scientist Igor Sutyagin, convicted of espionage, Russian media reports. |
09.07.2010, 03:06
3 comments
US legal system should differentiate between types of sex offendersThe issue of what to do with convicted sex offenders in America is not black and white. There are several shades of gray, both in terms of the types of offenders and the types of laws that deal with them. |
People will always hate sex offenders regardless of whatever punishment is placed on them. So the logic is not to ask victims what is an acceptable form of punishment because they have no unbiased view of it. Now the people who work in mental health although they make an effort to be experts on this subject, they really are not qualified at deciding what punishments are acceptable for this crime because they don't know what prison is life, they don't have any experience being on the registry so their input is not valid either. Now we all know that the percentage of actual sex offenders that commit a new sex offensse is a small number. nobody actually knows what the real number is but without a doubt its smaller than all other types of criminals. We already have in place long jail sentences for people that re-offend. So my friends problem solved. We remove the registry. We remove public notification. We remove Jessica's law. We modify CORI or criminal backgrounds to "seven years only" for all first sexual offenses. The current system in place prevents people who want to live productive lives from doing so with the background checks and the "registry." Every person deserves a chance to earn a living after he has finished his punishment. The registry is additional punishment. It prevents "non-dangerous people from starting their lives over, making a living, and having money. It is illegal to prevent people from starting their lives over once they learned their lessons. Sex offenders do not re-offend. sex offenders are not bad people. they made a mistake and want to live normal lives again. The laws in place now "prevent" non dangerous, non violent sex offenders from getting jobs, having money, and living normal lives again. The laws have to be changed so people who want a 2nd chance can have it. Privacy is the only way for these people to live normal lives again. If they decide to break the law - there are deterrents already in place for that. We do not need to punish people twice for a sex crime. Please give them their privacy back so they can work, blend back into the community, and live normal lives again. Thank you.











yes its right. stray animals have more opportunities and rights and privileges than most sex offenders now. its time to take our country back from these vigilantees called politicians and public safety fanatics. sue them and sue them now. it costs 450 dollars in most states.and you dont even need a lawyer. if youre successful u can get your legal fees back. the legislature does not have the power to pass out punishment. its a violation of separation of powers clause in the constitution or amendments. anyone convicted of failure to register or failure to do anything can state that the laws cant be enforced because you can only be punished by judges and juries and not the clowns who work in the legislative branch. dont even waste your time obeying any laws now since they are all 100% illegal and unconstitutional. you have no representation in govt now. its time to start dumping the tea back into the harbors. stray pets are being treated more humanely than anyone convicted of a sexual offense dating back to 1901. there is no statute of limitations for sexual offenses but there are statute of limitations for anything related to your constitutional rights. stand up and let your voice be heard in this country. fight these people where they have no strengths in federal district court. you cant be punished twice in this country once by a judge and once by the legistlature. the sex offender registry and all of its rules are as remedial as the dropping of the atomic bomb was remedial to nagasaki and hiroshima. dont let public safety and the legislature tell you how you can live your life. its yours and not theirs. kennedy v. martinez-mendoza. remember that case it may save your life. dont vote for any politicians that passed megans law. get them ousted and replaced by people who arent more sympathetic to dogs than sex offenders. contact me at diehard25fl@yahoo.com and tell me how you can help in removing these laws permanently. thanks.