VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   START treaty does not mean full understanding reached- journalist  
MORE ON THE STORY
05.05.2009, 02:18 2 comments

"Russia and US can show way in arms cuts"

Arms reduction would ease tensions around the world and “would give Moscow and Washington a solid base to do the same with other nuclear powers”, said Dr Walid Phares from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

S-300 defence missile system 22.09.2010, 20:40 58 comments

Russia not to sell S-300 missiles to Iran

President Dmitry Medvedev on Wednesday signed a decree which bans deliveries of S-300 missile systems to Iran.

Sergey Lavrov (AFP Photo / Yuri Kadobnov) 06.04.2010, 11:42

Russia, US to reduce warheads by a third – Lavrov

The new Moscow-Washington nuclear arms reduction treaty, START, will be based on the principle of parity and indivisible security for all parties, Russia’s Foreign Minister has said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks on the New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) between the US and Russia, at the State Department in Washington, DC, August 11, 201 12.08.2010, 12:36 12 comments

Delaying START ratification hurts US security – Clinton

US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has urged the Senate to ratify the new American-Russian nuclear arms reduction treaty, START. No access to monitor the Russian nuclear arsenal puts US security at risk, she said.

08.04.2010, 23:52 1 comment

Getting off to a re-START: Russia-US sign historic deal

Taking a step toward a nuke-free world, Presidents Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama have signed a crucial arms-control treaty cutting Russian and American strategic nuclear arsenals by about a third.

Sergey Lavrov 16.10.2009, 21:48 10 comments

“Russia needs more clarity on US missile defense plans” – Lavrov

Russia is awaiting more information from the US on their plans to build an alternative missile defense system by 2018, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

17.08.2010, 17:01 8 comments

Iran plans more nuclear plants and unveils new hi-tech drones

Tehran will continue uranium enrichment because the country needs it for the 20 future power plants like Bushehr, the head of Iran’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Alaeddin Borouujerdi said.

29.01.2010, 10:27

“Nuclear disarmament is in both US and Russian interests” – ex-ambassador

Russia and the US could be closer than ever to signing a new arms reduction treaty. Thomas Pickering, a former US ambassador to Russia, believes that a state of zero-weapons is just a matter of time for both.

01.03.2010, 10:52 3 comments

Russia’s unilateral disarmament is out of question – Russian diplomat

The US prefers to avoid any legal limits in developing national missile systems, which is absolutely unacceptable for Russia, said the chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, Konstantin Kosachev.

27.05.2009, 20:33 3 comments

“Russia tests prevailing mood in NATO countries”

Mikhail Troitsky, a political analyst from Moscow University of International Relations, discusses the predominant concerns in the Russia-NATO council meeting in Brussels.

START treaty does not mean full understanding reached- journalist

Published: 28 May, 2010, 20:49
Edited: 30 May, 2010, 04:47

RIA Novosti / Sergey Guneev, STF

(11.8Mb) embed video

TAGS: Arms, Nuclear, Russia, Politics, Law, USA


“The American side is acting in sheer disregard of the very concept of the START treaty as it is understood in Russia,” said Kommersant magazine’s Sergey Strokan, referring to the deployment of US missiles in Poland.

According to Strokan, despite the recent treaty, Russia and the US seem to disagree on the basic issue of whether the US has the right to build its newest ABM system.

“The Obama administration would not restrict itself from going ahead with its ABM systems,” Strokan said. “As Robert Gates blankly put it, regardless of Russian objections, we will go ahead with this.”

The journalist says this policy might at one point force Russia to withdraw from the treaty.

“After ratifying the treaty we might find out that we have a basic misunderstanding over the essence of the treaty,” he warned.

“Every treaty contains a right to withdraw,” pointed out Aleksandr Pikaev, a political analyst from the Institute of World Economy and International Relations.

“We know very well that the treaty is good for American interests. So we don’t see any problems why Americans would not ratify it. But it’s a problem because of the American domestic political system. Therefore, we absolutely should not ratify it before. We will see how things in Washington will go,” said Pikaev.

Watch full video with Aleksandr Pikaev

downloadembed

0 (0 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
28.05.2010, 17:46 2 comments

No reason to deploy US missiles in Poland – Russia

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has voiced concerns over the recent deployment of Patriot missiles in Poland by the United States.

29.05.2010, 02:13 8 comments

BRIC to expand multipolar world with addition of Turkey

As the US fights with Brazil over Iran, the emerging powers of the BRIC group may be embracing Turkey.

toma May 29, 2010, 22:09
0

I do not believe it was ever about "understanding", it was about forcing the other party (Russia) to obey the US global imperialists. That didnt happen, but they are finding the ways not to "understand"