United effort: ridding the world of nuclear weapons
Published: 24 September, 2009, 22:02
Edited: 27 September, 2009, 10:30
TAGS: Arms, Nuclear, UN, Medvedev, Russia, Obama, Politics, USA
It took just minutes for the UN Security Council chaired by the American President Barack Obama to unanimously approve the US-drafted resolution aimed at global nuclear weapons disarmament and non-proliferation.
15 members of the Security Council have been discussing the resolution that essentially calls for all the countries with atomic weapons to get rid of them. Among the registered guests of the event are the former US Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George Shultz, former US Defense Secretary William Perry, media tycoon Ted Turner, and Queen Noor of Jordan.
Nuclear disarmament has been part of the Barack Obama’s agenda ever since he was campaigning for the US presidency and now it looks like he is delivering his promise.
Chairman Obama
Barack Obama made history again today as he became the first American president to chair a meeting of the Security Council, UN's most powerful body.
“We now face proliferation of a scope and complexity that demands new strategies and new approaches. Just one nuclear weapon exploded in the city, be it New York or Moscow, Tokyo or Beijing, London or Paris could kill hundreds of thousands of people," Barack Obama pointed out.
“Once more, the UN has a palpable role to play in preventing this crisis. The historic resolution we have just adopted enshrines our shared commitment to the goal of a world without nuclear weapons,” concluded the American President.
The united front of the Security Council has sent a strong signal to countries like North Korea and Iran, whose suspected nuclear ambitions have created serious concern worldwide.
Medvedev backs up the resolution
Speaking at the Security Council, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has called the measures promoted by the resolution “… a realistic program to effectively answer global threats in the nuclear sphere.”
To reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism, the Russian president called for all the members of the nuclear club to back up the US’s and Russia’s efforts to curb the proliferation of nuclear weapons and create a reliable, modern and up-to-date security program to prevent nuclear weapons’ components getting into the wrong hands, e.g. international terrorists, which inevitably leads to creating new approaches to the problem of nuclear non-proliferation.
“To solve the problems of nuclear non-proliferation is our common goal, but the current level of distrust between the countries prevents us from securing the deal fast and easily – but we must do it,” Medvedev said.
Summing up his speech, the Russian President appealed to the Security Council to quicken the ratification of the universal nuclear test ban treaty.
“We repeatedly state our readiness to move forward to reduce the number of delivery vehicles and strategic offensive arms more than three-fold,” the Russian President announced.
“Referring to the signing of a new, legally-binding Russian-American treaty on the reduction and limitation [of nuclear arms] … it’s planned to be signed by December 2009,” said Medvedev.
In turn, American President Barack Obama pointed out that the coming year is going to be crucial and called for the all parties involved to refrain from further nuclear test explosions before the treaty comes into force.
UN under fire
Criticism has been increasing towards the UN Security council in recent years, such as the speech by Libya's leader Muammar al-Gaddafi when he spoke in the UN on Wednesday during his first visit to the U.S. in 40 years.
He stood at the podium and unleashed a fierce attack against the UN, saying it is not a democratic institution because all power lays within the Security Council and the power must be shifted to the General Assembly.
Ahmadinejad and Gaddafi attack world order
“The question is, will the US stop”
Russia welcomed America's decision to overhaul the planned missile shield for Eastern Europe.
But some analysts are saying that despite the increased goodwill, the fundamental issue remains unresolved.
Andrew Cohen of the Heritage Foundation thinks this decision is only the beginning of a possibility of a better relationship, because “the main conflict is not the missile defence but the expansion of NATO, the key issue for Russia.”
Cohen told RT, “The question now is, will the U.S. stop the attempt to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia. We have the proof that this is the main issue because the so-called Russian-Georgian war in August 2008 was, in reality, a proxy of the Russian-American war.”
Read also: India Refuses To Be Discriminated as Nuclear Power
“Russia and US made remarkable progress towards nuke-free world”In last eight months there’s been “remarkable progress” between Moscow and Washington in working to cut their nuclear arsenals, Joseph Cirincione, President of Ploughshares Fund told RT. Medvedev-Obama |
Round eyes in front of a closed doorEven those who were not among the participants at the meeting of UN General Assembly could feel the scale of the event as they appeared in front of the closed doors of the Metropolitan Museum in NY. |
Nuclear disarmament is an absolute necessity. When the most powerful nations in the world set a precedent by disarming, the smaller nations will inevitably follow their lead. The United States, the UK, Russia, Israel, India, China, and Korea must be the first to dismantle their nuclear armaments programs and arsenal.
Nice sentiment. But it will serve more as a weapon against those that will try to develop nuclear energy, then against those that alrady have nuclear weapons. It is a political move on behalf of US to stop the critics who point at the IAEA founding principles. Those principles require that thenon-nuclear members forego the development of the nuclear weapons, and the countries with the weapons, there is an obligation to reduce them. While the pressure is on non-nuclear states to forgo even the development of nuclear energy, which is their right under IAEA charter, the nuclear club has no obligations. This symbolically puts nuclear club on notice that they have this responsiblity. How realistic is the Resolution? It is not. It does not even start to address the true global security for all, not just only those who can have satellite guided missiles at their disposal. But it makes for great PR. So that the young and gullable world-wide can go out on the nicely correographed protests against nuclear weapons, asking for a nuclear-free world. This is about looking good without work, and making great pronoucements which do not start to address the lack of security today for small and powerless.












Don't fall for this one. Why are we all happy to talk about nuclear disarmament? Simple for two reasons; the first because the big boys all have an alternative that is just as effective to use in terms of defensive posture, weapons that will derisk the government leaders from a direct conflict involving their electorate. Basically moving war back to the battlefield; notice politicians will always fight wars, when the killing is on the battlefield. They won't touch it when the voting public is swathed in radiation. The second is that it demotes second tier nations and prevents others joining the destructive club. So what will this mean then, in the end if it was ever implemented. Simply making sure that Russia and the US have a top spot, followed by China and then India Making sure no one else really has a look in for quite a time in the future. It would be a reset of weapons technology and the opening up of a gap that was starting to close. And the big bonus, you can lean hard on nations and deny them access to nuclear fuel, other than from your supply. See there is always a money motive. What a bunch of Bankers! Will it happen, maybe not, because if just one has nuclear weapons the others will retain them and the Politicians neck will remain on the block. Always a nice place to see it!