US plans to create another Guantanamo in Afghanistan
Published: 25 March, 2010, 09:22
Edited: 26 March, 2010, 04:24
TAGS: Crime, Human rights, Terrorism, Law, Afghanistan, USA
The US is considering holding international terror suspects at its Bagram airbase in Afghanistan. If approved, the facility north of Kabul could essentially become a new Guantanamo Bay.
Currently the US administration is struggling with the task of relocating over 180 inmates still held at Guantanamo.
But the Bagram solution is being opposed by a number of senior officials in Washington, including the top commander of NATO troops in Afghanistan. They fear it could jeopardize stabilization efforts in the country.
The new facility will be no different from Guantanamo Bay in terms of prisoner abuse, believes Jonathan Hafetz from the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents detainees.
“The Obama administration so far unfortunately seems to be more focused on the image, the association of Guantanamo without actually ending the real problems of Guantanamo – indefinite detention, using second-class systems of justice like military commissions rather than ordinary courts. That's the whole problem with Guantanamo: when you set up a prison outside the law you enable things like torture,” Hafetz told RT. “We still have a fundamental problem, which is that we are holding people indefinitely without charge, without trial going on eight-nine years now – something is that beyond the pale and violates our Constitution on basic human rights standards.”
Jake Diliberto from Veterans for Rethinking Afghanistan goes further in his cautions, saying expanding the Bagram facility could even pose a serious threat to the US.
“Bagram has been a place where the United States has taken prisoners into and held as a part of the occupation of Afghanistan. The problem of that is that there have been a lot of people that have been held there accidentally who perhaps didn't necessarily need to be there," Dileberto told RT. "If Bagram is expanded, two things are going to happen simultaneously. Provincial reconstruction teams, that's being done by civilian contractors, are going to slow or stop because they are going to get pulled in to expand the Bagram base, and the second thing entire American sentiment is going to skyrocket. These two problems are huge security threat.”
US and Russia have agreed on START termsPresident Dmitry Medvedev and US President Barack Obama have agreed upon the final details of the new START treaty aimed at cutting stockpiles of nuclear warheads, the US White House has announced. |
25.03.2010, 12:09
1 comment
Russian ballet star given libertyLegendary Russian ballet dancer and choreographer Vladimir Vasilyev, once referred to as the |
Obama must do something to justify his Nobel Peace Prize, so he sends the battered and terrified Guantanamo prisoners to the American gulags in Afghanistan. I suppose the waterboarding benches and buckets will accompany the prisoners. Way to go Obama!












Kihnu, have seen the recent docs on the history of U.S collaboration with number of brutal dictators in Latin American during the Cold War- in such horrific projects as Operation Condor? RT has reproduced Operation Condor. Take a look at it. You can also take a look at many documentaries by dedicated human rights activists such as John Pliger’s great docs on U.S historic war against democracy. I do not think the U.S has learned the lessons of the arrogance of power not only in WWII but also in WWI, Vietnam, Iraq, etc. The central question is not that the U.S brought to the world Gimo, Abu Graib sexual sadism and now is planning to expand this sadistic project to Afghanistan- where it hopes to continue its imperialistic torture/sadism- but that there is nothing knew about what the U.S is doing in Gimo or Abu Ghraib or Bagram. As for Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Henry Kissinger won Nobel Peace Prize. Look at the Henry Kissinger’s role in operation Condor. The Nobel peace prize is worthless from moral standpoint.