The most trusted journalist in America now is a comedian – media critic
Published: 05 April, 2010, 10:55
Edited: 07 April, 2010, 21:52
TAGS: Interview, Human rights, Mass media, USA
Most of the original reporting in the US is still being made by newspapers, the dying media, says Rory O’Connor, a media critic, journalist and filmmaker, yet they are quickly on the decline.
“There are fewer and fewer journalists working for newspapers and magazines which means there are less and less original reporting upon all of the commentaries we see in the blogosphere, in cable television,” O’Connor remarks.
When commenting on what he believes are the worst hate-talkers in America, such as Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, O’Connor said, “There is no place in American society to have a disagreement, particularly with the shock jocks on talk radio, on people’s ethnicity, on their religion, on their gender. What we find is that the shock jocks in particular are going after the most vulnerable members and sectors of our society,” states O’Connor. “[The US media is] an oral equivalent of driving in a highway and seeing an accident. Everybody says they are not going to look, but everybody does. You can’t take your eyes off of it.” The media can gain a large audience by being outrageous, by being extreme. The other thing, O’Connor believes, is that they are entertaining, yet still acting as journalists, so the audience thinks that they are getting real information from these people.
“Money has infected the entire American political system and our democracy is threatened by it,” the media critic observes. “Here is how it works – in order to be elected you need a lot of money to buy television and to buy all the media you need. So the politicians go and they ask corporations for money. The corporations give them money. Then the politician turns around and passes legislation on putting regulations that give even more money back to the corporations. 4.2 billion dollars every year is spent on advertising direct-to-consumer. This was the gift to the media and to the communications industry by the Democratic Party in exchange for support.”
O’Connor believes that this practice is producing a lot of misinformation, a lot of false hopes to people. There is advertising on US television for made-up drugs for made-up diseases, which is bad for health and also it is driving up health care costs, O’Connor states.
“When I watch the mainstream media I tend to throw things at my television set, so I try not to watch it that often,” the filmmaker confesses. “I don’t want to be all doom and gloom and say there is nothing good in the mainstream – there is. But I think that we have a big problem in this country when the most trusted news person in the country is a comedian named Jon Stewart. And I think it tells us a lot about our system when the comedians are more trusted than the journalists, and the journalists are functioning as comedians and clowns. That what needs to change.”
04.04.2010, 10:36
3 comments
Is fracking a threat to us all? NYC speaks outNatural gas industry officials and environmentalists in the US are at loggerheads over the safety of a controversial drilling technique. |
05.04.2010, 12:45
3 comments
“The US economy will not recover for at least another decade” – EngdahlAmerican bankers see themselves as the gods of money, a class above mere mortals, and they can do what they wish, said renowned economic researcher and historian William Engdahl in an interview with RT. |
The best thing with Jon Stewart is that not only does he takes controversial matters on and investigate them thoroughly, he also explains them in a very clear way. Anyone can understand how things work. The comedy is just icing on the cake and not whats important. US media is so utterly broken its just not somewhere you go for news anymore. I wonder how many journalists hate their jobs and long for the -70s where you could break great news without your boss putting the lid on everything even remotely sensitive. Wikileaks wouldnt exist if US journalists had even a hint of a spine.
RT wrote that its guest Rory O'Connor said, "When commenting on what he believes are the worst hate-talkers in America, such as Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, O’Connor said, “There is no place in American society to have a disagreement, particularly with the shock jocks on talk radio, on people’s ethnicity, on their religion, on their gender. What we find is that the shock jocks in particular are going after the most vulnerable members and sectors of our society." So O'Connor nailing people by name as hate talkers is not hate speech and there is no place in American society to have a disagreement, forgetting the Revolution of 1776 to protect free speech, all said by a person that is employed and paid as a "critic?" I suggest your critic apply for PR work with Chavez, a perfect match for stopping hate speech. Chavez shut down all the media and took over his country's supermarkets. After reading your "critic's" massive whining, I wonder if someone doesn't need a time out for being so naughty, or is that too strong a word? I wonder if RT's guest would instead jump up and down by this statement from Bill Maher on HBO, feeling it is filled with tones of pleasant diversity one must bow to in awe: "Yes, yes, the love of our troops, the ultimate in fake terrorism. Are you kidding . . . Yeah, we love the troops the way Michael Vick Loves Dogs."












Rory O'Connor is peddling a book. This piece is not objective. It reports on the opinion of one man. No legitimate journalism outlet would publish a one-source story. Whoever wrote this story should contact the people O'Connor "nailed" as hate speakers such as Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, ask them questions and let us readers decide what is truth. Documentary film makers such as O'Connor, through editing and source selection, can advance their perception of "truth" and make the most reasonable person in the universe into a scapegoat in the same manner of the shock jocks who, according to O'Connor, shamefully attack "the most vulnerable members and sectors of our society." Demagogues are scattered all along the political-belief spectrum.