VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   “The US wants to punish country that Israel doesn’t like”   Comments  
MORE ON THE STORY
The NATO military exercise (AFP Photo / Robert Aatamnasovski) 03.03.2010, 20:53 94 comments

NATO military exercises planned as Baltic States hit panic button

The military alliance has announced, it plans to carry out a series of air force exercises over Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia from March 17-20.

26.03.2010, 15:02 5 comments

Strategic arms deal to be signed in Prague

A new nuclear arms reduction treaty will be signed by the Russian and American presidents on April 8 in the Czech capital Prague, as agreed during a phone conversation between Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama.

Mohammed El Baradei (L) talks with Vilmos Cserveny, (2-R), Director of the IAEA Office of External Relations and Policy Coordination during a meeting of representatives of France (AFP Photo / Samuel Kubani) 21.10.2009, 15:38 7 comments

Iran enrichment talks group gets a deal

Negotiators have reached a draft deal, which will see Iranian uranium processed in Russia and France to produce ready-to-use nuclear fuel rods.

Iran, Tehran: Tehran's mayor Mahmood Ahmadinejad. (AFP Photo / Behrouz Mehri) 27.07.2010, 13:14 14 comments

US to attack 2 Mid-East countries in next 3 months– Ahmadinejad

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has stated that the US and Israel are planning to launch two military attacks in the Middle East in the near future as part of a “psychological war” on Tehran.

Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, RIA Novosti / Ilya Pitalev 09.03.2010, 17:29 4 comments

Sanctions on Iran possible as a last resort – Lavrov

Sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear program can be imposed only after all other possibilities are exhausted, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

SEA, USS SHILOH :  US Navy handout shows a Standard Missile Three (SM-3) being launched from the guided missile cruiser USS Shiloh  (AFP Photo / US Navy) 17.09.2009, 20:29 3 comments

What will new US anti-missile plan look like?

President Obama announced the US is changing its missile defense plans and will be abandoning its former proposal to install fixed sites in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Iran: Picture obtained from the Iranian ISNA news agency on December 16, 2009 shows the test-firing at an undisclosed location in Iran of an improved version of the Sejil 2 medium-range missile which the Islamic republic says can reach targets inside Israel. (AFP Photo / Vahi Reza Alaee) 02.08.2010, 23:20 3 comments

Washington prepares to activate missile shield in Southern Europe

The US may soon start deploying its missile shield in Turkey or Bulgaria, according to Pentagon officials.

17.09.2009, 17:12 2 comments

“Strategic talks shouldn’t take central stage in 21st century”

Strategic issues such as the shelving of US AMD in Eastern Europe shouldn’t dominate relations between states in the modern world, says Sergey Utkin from the Institute of World Economy and International Relations.

Iran, Tehran. Market on map 17.09.2009, 20:20 2 comments

“Iran is the target, not Russia”

Investigative journalist and RT contributor Wayne Madsen believes Washington’s shelving of its proposed anti-missile shield in Eastern Europe was part of a quid pro quo with Russia.

Painting by Anton Brzezinski 10.03.2009, 22:00 1 comment

Will Iran spark a game of nuclear dominoes in Middle East?

The prospect of Iran releasing the nuclear genie in the future is greatly upsetting the global geopolitical calculus in significant ways.

“The US wants to punish country that Israel doesn’t like”

Published: 25 September, 2009, 20:50
Edited: 27 October, 2010, 11:43


The US has warned Iran of further sanctions. Prof Pirouz Mojtahed-Zadeh from the University of Tehran says America is committed to the existence and security of Israel, therefore wants to punish any country it doesn’t li

 
11 COMMENTS
armen08 September 25, 2009, 20:13 quote
0

The Iranian professor, Mojtahed-Zadeh, is perfectly right. Israel wants the whole world to disappear, so that the remaining people, themselves and their ilk in other countries, especially the US, can live. This is, of course, an absurd concept from which the Zionists seem not to be able to liberate themselves. They may be able to use the US for a little longer, but not forever. The American people cannot be held hostage to the whims of a criminal state and sooner or later will not tolerate their destiny to be determined by a single-focus ethnic minority that happens to control, for now, the levers of all power in the country.

marge September 25, 2009, 21:38 quote
0

Iran is plagued by the double standards and hypocrisy coming from the US and G-20, which are denying Iran and the arab countries military defensive weapons that Israel possesses. No country can be expected to not build nuclear bombs when they are surrounded by enemy troops (US) and a hostile country like Israel that has 200-300 nuclear bombs and frequently threatens to bomb Iran. The US also has nuclear bombs. Yet, the International community is using all its energy to pressure Iran to give up its right to enrich uranium, while ignoring Israel's 200-300 nuclear bombs and threats against Iran. Even Russia seems willing to throw Iran under the train for the US. The double standards, hypocrisy, and injustice of the US and G-20 on Iran is unbelieveable and outrageous.

Biloxi September 25, 2009, 21:48 quote
0

Human beings in this 21st Century mince words as though painting cave pictures! Caves had beautiful stories told in paint, these days obfuscating the facts: #1, investors who have money in the global market including the countries at the G-20 (call it what it is ... G-I-Had ... the brand of acceptability dressed up as though leaders of developed civilizations on the planet in 2009), are in total control of the time/situation. Iran can be sanctioned by the investors by THEIR pulling THEIR money out of the country to take bets on which way it’s going to fall. Globalists invest in every known and unknown commodity of trade: greed and profit run THEIR government systems and it’s no different today than it was when the cave dwellers painted history. How many stages of life Shakespeare's players is necessary to see ALL the world’s a stage and the characters appear - cast of cannibals - yesterday, today and clearly this set is frozen in the stone ages of beasts and their prey. Trading flesh is just that, no matter what time - the G20 investors have no shame. How practical is the human digression rather than the forward journey: time paints the story in spite of all the words spoken in multiple languages. A state of mind - POWER - and, 20 countries on a planet named earth with billions of “others” - the maths are definitely not lined up in the universe’s clock in the co-creation of life for more than just the G-I-Had mine and too bad for those who are not THEM?

Loup Kibiloki September 26, 2009, 00:10 quote
0

Sad. Russia has fallen prey to Western pro-zionist drive. Essentially, this is a geopolitical error. The same she committed when signing a secret agreement with Adolf Hitler. Indeed, it is much more difficult to stop committing the same geopolitical error than it is to stop smoking. Russia will let down Iran for a morsel of it, as she did for Poland. This is asuric. This is an error. A very sad one. And Russia Today isn't any more independant from political power than Radio-Canada, or the BBC are. I pray I'm completely wrong on that. Meanwhile, dommage.

William September 26, 2009, 23:36 quote
0

Iran has called for the removal of Israel from Palestine. It argues for this on the basis of humanitarian, logical, and legalistic arguments, but this is all rather pointless. Because whether or not Israel should be moved to the US, which is where it should be moved if it is moved, the fact of the matter is that the Israelis are unwilling to leave what they consider to be their ancestral homeland, and Israeli's large nuclear arsenal and formidable conventional military ensure that only a few powers in the world are capable of moving it and even they cannot do so without risking the loss of the millions of lives, perhaps even billions if the Israelis set off enough nuclear weapons to cause a nuclear winter. Israel is, for those reasons, unmovable, and Iran's acclamations and attempts to the effect that it be moved are irresponsible because since they ask for and try to achieve the impossible they can accomplish nothing positive. They can and are however inviting upon themselves the acrimony of the west, are destabilizing the region through the support of anti-Israeli terrorists who can accomplish nothing other than the deaths a few Israelis in the exchange for the death of thousands of Palestinians, are destabilizing the region by promoting a regional arms race, and are increasing the probability of a war involving them that could cripple the global economy. In other words, Iran's policy towards Israel, though well-intentioned, is bunch of unmitigated idiocy. In this atmosphere, there is very little trust between the West and Iran. Without trust and with power, there can only be adversarial mentalities. And this in turn makes the Iranian enrichment program unacceptable to the west because even if the Iranians don't presently intend to obtain nuclear weapons, their completed civilian nuclear program will leave them within stone's throw of obtaining them. The program is power, power the west may go to great lengths to prevent from materializing.

Count Cash September 28, 2009, 09:40 quote
0

Step by Step - Step one is a nuclear free middle east, including Israel; in the end they won't be able to resist!. Then we move on to step 2... and there is always a plan B. You simply cannot stop a river reaching its natural course without huge expended efforts. The West in the end won't spend this effort, it is always the case. Israel in the US is the logical solution in the end. If it was started now and phased, it could be a well orgainised operation.

JG September 28, 2009, 13:47 quote
0

If Iran leaders stop making statements about destroying Israel and sponsoring terrorists in Lebanon and elsewhere, their problems with the USA and others will mostly go away. But perhaps they prefer to feed a hatred which keeps them in power. Whatever others think or the rights and wrongs of the issue, the Jews aren't going to be moved out of their homeland again - and they have weaponry to ensure this. If the founders of Islam hadn't positioned mosques on top of the holiest sites of both Judaism and Christianity in a bid to destroy both, we wouldn't be in this position today. B.T.W. the reason why the USA and others in G20 are worried about Iran having nuclear weapons but not Israel, India or even Pakistan is that they don't believe the latter group would use them unless attacked - but they believe Iran might use nuclear weapons offensively, without warning.

Count Cash September 29, 2009, 20:16 quote
0

What the western group think of Iran is irelevent, any thing they want to do is dead on arrival at the UN security council without Russia and China on board. No longer will we accept the terrorist ultimatum from the west, of do what we want or be bombed. It is what has got us into the mess in the first place. An escalation of white phosphorous to nuclear strike would be an act of suicide by Israel..The only solution for Israel is a political one, if it can't accept that, then its weapons will ensure its own destruction! All options are still on the table, including relocating the whole state. There is never a never.

Alex September 30, 2009, 02:44 quote
0

It would be extremely unwise for Iran to trust any superpower. It is a club for mass murderers, over compensators and of course the greedy self-interested variety of sub-human. In reality the only difference between a garbage collector and a power monger is access to information; and judging by the state of the world (even with this clear advantage and endless assets at their fingertips) the ‘elite’ power mongers still manage to be disgusting snivelling cowards. Power is exclusive and held together by way of sensory bombardment, necessarily, for the powerful truly fear the majorities awakening. Save the poor, eat the rich.

Daniel September 30, 2009, 17:48 quote
0

The bottom line is that, were either Israel, the US, or both, to attack Iran militarily, it would escalate into a wider war. Russia and China would almost invariably get involved, just due to sheer inertia. It would then be very difficult for the Western powers to de-escalate the conflict. There can be no viable "corrective measure" from the West towards Iran. The wargames that have been conducted in the US this decade have proven this to be so.

Hexxor October 27, 2010, 07:11 quote
0

The only thing that could make Russia to stop support iran would be if the israelis had passed on spy data on iran to te russians. For example some high level iranian officials bragging that once they have the nukes in their hands, they would pass them on to hizbollah, hamas and the chechen muslim terrorists. The chechens are the soft spot of russia. Its a great chess game going on in the background that we dont see directly.

POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image