US Supreme Court upholds Obama anti-terror law
Published: 22 June, 2010, 04:36
Edited: 24 June, 2010, 10:59
TAGS: Politics, Human rights, Law, USA
The US Supreme Court upheld on June 21 the government's authority to ban aid from being supplied to designated terrorist groups.
Many argue such aid is a necessity to persuading some groups toward peaceful and legal activities. A number of human rights organizations claim the ban hinders their ability to persuade people to abandon radicalism, since the ban prohibits the organizations to offer speeches and political training. The justices voted 6-3 to reject a free-speech challenge from humanitarian aid groups.
“This law, for the first time in the history of the United States, makes a crime out of pure speech that is aimed at peaceful non-violent lawful conduct,” said professor and human rights activist Ralph Fertig.
Fertig said that restricting the speech of individuals based on political classifications enacted by the State Department is wrong, it violates one’s right to free speech.
“Jimmy Carter would have been arrested under this law for negotiating and monitoring elections in Syria because he had to talk to organizations that had been labeled terrorists,” said Fertig.
Fertig argued that a ban on passing material goods is one thing, but a ban on giving speeches and providing verbal training violates his right to speech and impedes the humanitarian process.
“My speech is not tradable for anything that could be used for violence,” said Fertig.
22.06.2010, 03:29
2 comments
US immigration debate moves north to NebraskaA proposed anti-immigration law in Fremont, Nebraska would ban local businesses from hiring or renting to illegal immigrants, if passed by voters. |
22.06.2010, 10:06
2 comments
Safe and transparent system essential for US adoption in RussiaMoscow and Washington are now trying to find ways to come up with a deal to end the adoption ban. Yet even parents who have successfully adopted Russian kids have had to overcome tough barriers. |
Almost two years into his mandate, President Obama and to some President Obamer, did not make any serious change that we can believe in. Gitmo is still open and men are still being tortured there; the U.S still occupies Iraq, more people have killed by U.S droons since Obamer came to the White House than in the 8 years of GWB misrule. For the Europeans and Americans, they have to pretend the under Obama wa. Violence, and torture is peace and that Obamer is a peace maker and he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, for the rest of the world, Obama is the black face of a dangerous but flagging empire of chaos.












Were is the "like" button?