VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   USA   News   Oops! US Air Force loses 50 nukes  
MORE ON THE STORY
19.11.2010, 13:33 14 comments

Russia-NATO relationship is one-way traffic

What does NATO offer Russia, and what does Russia get in reality? Would Russia be willing to help NATO stay afloat by participating in its projects? What is the price of improving relations with its Western partners?

RT Politics Interview Russia-NATO relations
Peace Activists close NATO Headquarters 24.10.2010, 03:25 12 comments

NATO is a past matter – Russian scholar

NATO has no future and today we have to re-think European security anew to switch to other forms of interaction between Russia and the EU, insists Viktor Kremyenuk, Deputy Director of the U.S. and Canada Institute.

20.10.2010, 19:41 7 comments

Moscow looking for European “re-think” at Munich Security Conference

President Dmitry Medvedev met with members of the Munich Security Conference today to discuss prospects for a new European security architecture amidst a rapidly changing neighborhood.

Sergey Lavrov speaks to students of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations in Moscow on September 1, 2010 (AFP Photo / Yuri Kadobnov) 01.09.2010, 13:43 15 comments

NATO stuck between past and future – Lavrov

Moscow expects more clarity in relations with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

02.07.2009, 09:18 15 comments

NATO bombings’ aftermath takes toll on Serbia

There's a ticking time bomb in Serbia, where doctors have reported a sharp increase in cancer deaths among locals and claim this could be linked to NATO's use of depleted uranium shells during the 1999 bombings.

18.05.2010, 17:02 9 comments

Russia on standby as NATO goes global

NATO’s blueprint for change mentions cooperation with Russia as a new priority, but Moscow is pushing for more than just words.

Medvedev-Obama Russia-NATO relations
19.05.2010, 18:56 12 comments

Does America consider Russia friend or foe? Antimissile system will show

Washington and NATO have recently declared the intention of enhancing their partnership with Russia, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating, the saying goes, not in the promises.

Medvedev-Obama
AFP Photo / David Furst 07.10.2010, 17:43 11 comments

America’s “Afghan trap” enters 10th year

When the US opened “Operation Enduring Freedom” in Afghanistan following 9/11, few people questioned the decision. But today, after nine years of sacrifice, that attitude is changing.

An US Army 10th Mountain soldier looks at a passing donkey, 2002, Afghanistan (AFP Photo / Pool / Joe Raedle) 24.07.2009, 02:12 7 comments

"Operation in Afganistan is rooted in Israel"

The real reason why the U.S. continues its presence in Afghanistan is Iran – the country which is an annoyance for Israel, said Karen Kwiatkowski, a writer and former U.S. Air Force officer.

23.02.2010, 21:42 7 comments

Moldova welcomes US ballistic missile defense system to Romania

Moldova is downplaying Romania's decision to host elements of a US missile defense system on its territory.

Oops! US Air Force loses 50 nukes

Published: 28 October, 2010, 01:16
Edited: 28 October, 2010, 19:55

(34.2Mb) embed video

TAGS: Military, NATO, Nuclear, USA


US military lost track of 50 intercontinental ballistic missiles recently. The incident became public after a former Air Force officer tweeted about the loss of communication between the missiles and the control center.

This, at the same time as members of the Obama administration, have spoken repeatedly about the importance of safe and secure nuclear programs.

The world must stand together to prevent the spread of these weapons,” said US President Barrack Obama in a previous speech.

As long as nuclear weapons are required to deter aggression and defend our country and our allies we will maintain a safe, secure and effective nuclear arsenal,” said US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.

What does this say about the US nuclear program? Michel Chossudovsky, the director of the Center for Research on Globalization in Montréal, Canada, said this is a big concern, but not the worst case scenario by any means.

He argued that politicians do the greatest harm, by maintaining and contending that nuclear weapons are not a threat to civilians, as the Obama administration has continues to argue.

The Senate a few years ago actually reclassified tactical nuclear weapons as safe for civilians and re-categorized them as conventional weapons,” said Chossudovsky.

He explained that mistakes in computer and communication systems are ongoing, but the news rarely makes it to the media. The public is rarely informed.

Instead we are told that the threat to humanity is the H1N1,” Chossudovsky said.


Click to enlarge
The US and NATO have pointed nuclear arms at Iran and others, and have indicated a willingness to use them in a preemptive nature, argued Chossudovsky. But the US media rarely covers the topic.

Cuba’s Fidel Castro recently made a statement regarding nuclear weapons and global war implications, arguing that a conventional war against Iran would inevitably lead to a nuclear incident, further leading to a global war. None of the major North American media outlets covered his comments.

Iran and nuclear topics are big news in the US, but when the US loses nuclear weapons very little is said and the American public simply moves on.

Western nations holding nuclear weapons are just as much a threat to global security as Israel, argued Chossudovsky.

“Iran is not a threat,” he said. “The threat comes from the United States, NATO and Israel.”

Although Obama has said he wants to decrease the number of nuclear weapons globally, the US Department of Energy is working to expand American nuclear weapon making capabilities. Hans Kristensen, the director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists explained that the debate balances on both wanting to eliminate nuclear weapons, while also maintaining a strong force until that point to ensure safety. This is the debate among many congressional leaders.

The new START Treaty between the US and Russia on mutual nuclear arms reductions has yet to be ratified by the US. It is possible this incident could impact the treaty.

There is the expectation in congress that some people in congress may try to hook onto this incident and use it as an excuse for why they should not ratify the new START Treaty. Whether it comes to that, we’ll have to see. I certainly hope not,” Kristensen said.

Watch the full interview with Hans Kristensen

+12 (15 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
27.10.2010, 16:05 1 comment

Europe’s security architecture needs "a Russian support column"

The prospect for sustainable relations between Russia and NATO will depend on how the Alliance’s new strategy gives due consideration to Russian concerns over European security.

Medvedev-Obama
28.10.2010, 01:20

Is the political sex scandal dead?

If trends continue, sex scandals may no longer mean the end of a politician’s political career.