&host=rt.com&uri=/usa/news/usa-media-propaganda-war-military/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
Media propaganda sells wars to America
Published: 18 January, 2011, 01:09
TAGS: Anniversary, Conflict, Military, Politics, Mass media, History, Iraq, USA
The American media machine has worsened over the years in its ability to report facts over government propaganda.
January 16th marked the 20 year anniversary of the first Gulf War, where a UN-authorized coalition force led by the US and UK went to war with Iraq to force Iraqi troops out of Kuwait.
However, many argue the war was actually an attempt to secure access to Kuwaiti oil resource, a notion left undiscussed by the media at that time. Americans were deliberately kept in the dark by the US media and Pentagon, who used PR agencies to spin a government approved message.
Deliberate propaganda hoaxes included stories about Iraqis killing Kuwaiti babies and stealing incubators to weapons of mass destruction.
John R. MacArthur, the publisher of Harper’s Magazine and author of “Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf” said the media has gotten worse at questioning the message, even the 2003 media coverage leading up to the invasion of Iraq was full of propaganda and disinformation.
“In 2003 you had the Secretary of State, Colin Powel, telling outrageous lies. You had the New York Times, the most respected newspaper in the United States repeating the most outrageous lies about Saddam Hussein’s atomic bomb program, which of course didn’t exist. It turned out it was non-existent,” he explained. “It’s a catastrophe what happened in Iraq this time around. This is all based on propaganda campaigns that were not properly challenged by the American media.”
He explained that the government sells propaganda to newspapers because it is effective, and the US media buying into it. MacArthur argued the American media and journalists have forgotten who they serve, who they are reporting to and for and what their purpose is.
“The United States Constitution says quite explicitly ‘We the People of the United States’ are writing this constitution, ratifying this constitution. In this country the people are sovereign. Not the government,” he commented. “Reporters have to say to themselves, I work for the American people. I don’t work for the American government. My loyalty should be the Constitution and to the sovereign people of the United States. The American media has completely forgotten this.”
He explained journalists have divulged into protecting the government, protecting the government’s interest and not the peoples’.
“This is not what the founding fathers had in mind,” MacArthur added.
Journalists should report the truth using common sense rules. Release information, ask questions. The media does not need to endanger lives, but can use common sense to report the facts and ask the right questions, he argued.
18.01.2011, 01:00
8 comments
US industry dependent on warfare stateThe US military said it plans to curb spending over the next five years, but it will be a hard task to complete since there is an entire global industry that relies on ongoing conflict to sustain its coffers. |
18.01.2011, 01:13
8 comments
African Americans suffering under ObamaAs African-American unemployment remains at over 15 percent, the Black community questions whether placing hopes on Obama was a mistake. |
It is difficult to know the exact official statistics of how many people watch, read, contribute, or follow the mass media in the Federal Republic of the United States; it would obviously be a very large percent of the population. Though it is also obvious that there are divisions in how news is reported. Whether from the left, center, right, or simply off the political bell curve~ news spreads like brush-fire. However, to assume that the collective public sentiment has a single minded and government sponsored view of current events is as much of a fallacy as any propaganda spewed forth. This goes for any people, in any land, ruled by any government. There are certainly many cases in which the United States government actually has a verifiable defense in terms of the media. This includes matters of national security, public health, and a very few others. Other than that, the media is an autonomous unit protected by the first amendment of the United States Bill of Rights. Does the Russian Federation have something similar? To add to the argument: "What gunpowder did for war; the printing-press did for the mind." -Wendell Phillips
The American media, a.k.a. the free press of the most democratic country in the world, is nothing but the property of the big capitalists and the financiers who run the country. AS such, the American media is NOT accessible to the American people. An ordinary American is not allowed to express her opinion in the controlled media, unless the opinion supports the interests of the ruling class. There is no mystery behind the nedia being the mouthpiece of the imperialists and the militarists because it is the latter who own the media and pay the salaries of those who work in the media. There you go. You are out of the loop, American people. Ignore your mainstream media and go to the Internet sites to find the truth about lies being hashed daily in your newspapers, radio/television, and what not.
I guess this story explains why I, a US Veteran, and many other Americans now read RT for the "real" news at home and use Foxnews, Washington Post, NY Times, CNN, and others for laughs. They are about as reliable as Baghdad Bob. The sad part is that so many people have yet to notice.