Reagan legacy hijacked by mainstream media
Published: 08 February, 2011, 02:04
US, Washington: This file photo from the 1953 movie "Law and Order" shows former US President Ronald Reagan. (AFP Photo)
(11.7Mb) embed videoTAGS: Anniversary, Politics, Mass media, USA
This weekend, President Ronald Reagan celebrated his 100th birthday. But since he’s not alive anymore, former followers and supporters celebrated for him, with a party fit for a King.
Over the last few years, Regan’s name has been invoked by conservative politicians and Tea Party activists as the model President and great Republican. Now, the US media has jumped on board spending hours dishing out praise for the 40th President.
Sunday, NBC’s Meet the Press broadcast directly from the Reagan Library, as several others did as well.
“He stuck to his principles, he was authentic which is one of the reasons why he’s so admired and he knew when he needed to compromise,” said Correspondent Andrea Mitchell of President Reagan.
Most networks traveled to California for the festivities and news anchors spoke about their fondest memories. One Fox anchor said Reagan’s words still “give her the chills."
Former White House Chief of Staff under Reagan, James Baker, also appearing on Meet the Press, said, “He knew when to hold em, he knew when to fold em, he was a fine negotiator.He learned all that as the head of the Screen Actors Guild.”
CNN’s John King asked Newt Gingrich, “Why is it in your view that everybody who’s a Republican, almost everybody, wants to be a Reagan Republican?”
“Well he’s the most significant Republican since Abraham Lincoln,” Gingrich responded.
It was clear what the US media didn’t want to discuss was his actual record.
Under Reagan, the number of employees in the federal government grew from $2.8 million to $3 million. The national debt grew from $700 billion to $3 trillion during his time in office. And he may have lowered taxes but he also raised taxes after having lowered them. Still, Sarah Palin remembered him as a friend to the Real American.
“President Reagan said you can’t be for big government, big taxes and big bureaucracy and still be for the little guy,” Palin remarked.
08.02.2011, 01:44
6 comments
Assange may face death, Manning kept in solitaryWikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s extradition hearing to determine whether he will be sent to Sweden began Feb 7 in London. Meanwhile PFC Bradley Manning continues to sit in solitary confinement in the United States. |
09.02.2011, 01:48
5 comments
US Patriot Act is unconstitutionalThe US Congress is moving to renew the USA PATRIOT Act, a controversial anti-terrorism law. The major provisions of the bill will expire soon, forcing the Congress to entertain the measure once again. |
The story of Ronald Reagan is an example of creating a legend (by deliberate distortion of the reality) for political reasons and with the purpose of controlling and manipulating the current ignorant and uneducated generation of Americans...
During that time when Reagan was a president, his ranking (approval rating) among Americans was at the same level as George W. Bush during his first term. Currently, though, Reagan was moved up to the category of 10 best American Presidents of all times. I guess, something similar happened with Jesus Christ as well. Human's "objectivity" and memories are just amazing. Can you believe anything what is written in history books?





GaryMax,
Ratings, although, always biased in every specific case, all together (provided by different/independent research groups and integrated), provide relatively accurate snapshots of mood in society at specific times. So, I consider them as useful information. But, with a couple of conditions -- a) I never rely only on one source of such ratings (and especially if they are based on limited samples of opinions) and b) I recognize only opinion given about current time and about local place.
For example, I would dismiss any ratings given today about any US president, but Obama. But, I accept the ratings given to Ronald Reagan in 1985-1989, the same as I accept the rating given to G.W.Bush in 2005-2008. I don't care though, how Americans today rank both Reagan and Bush.