Call the cops! Secret NYPD cell flushed out by 911 anti-terror call

Published time: July 25, 2012 18:23
Edited time: July 25, 2012 22:23
Mario Tama / Getty Image / AFP

“Really? In New Brunswick?” asks a baffled 911 operator as an alarmed caller reports an empty flat strewn with photos of terrorists and Muslim books. But when the FBI dash to the scene, they find not a terrorist cell but a New York police hideout.

­Nothing promised such a major embarrassment for the New York Police Department on a June day. Then the 911 telephone line of the New Brunswick Police rang. An alarmed resident of the New Jersey town was saying he had come across something very suspicious.

"What's suspicious?" asked the 911 dispatcher.

"It’s suspicious in the sense that the apartment has no furniture except two beds, has no clothing, has New York City Police Department radios," replied a building superintendent of an apartment complex just off the Rutgers University campus.

"Really?"

"There's computer hardware, software, you know, just lying around,” continued the caller. “There's pictures of terrorists. There's pictures of our neighboring building that they have."

"In New Brunswick?" the dispatcher asked – still seemingly unconvinced.  

Though the two were talking back in 2009, the tape of the call has only this week been obtained from the New Brunswick Police Department, following a court action by the Associated Press.

The caller, Salil Sheth, had just been doing his job, conducting a routine inspection and had come across a flat which almost screamed 9/11. Rushing to the scene, the FBI found a small apartment with no furniture or clothes, but with two computers, dozens of black plastic boxes and piles of Muslim literature on the solitary table.

A closer look at apartment No.1076 caused eyebrows to be raised even higher. This was no terrorist cell, but a secret hideout of New York City Police Department detectives, who later proved to have been gathering intelligence on the Muslim community of New Brunswick. But the NYPD had not bothered to inform local officers and agents of the operation.  

The materials found at the apartment showed New York officers had been using various techniques to spy on New Brunswick Muslims. They had infiltrated mosques, eavesdropped in cafes, kept tabs on student groups, including some at Rutgers University. This had enabled the officers to build databases on virtually anything.

However, Salil Sheth was not in on their plan, and the superintendent called 911 for a simple reason: New York authorities had encouraged the community to report anything suspicious, especially cases of obvious intelligence collection.

On top of the embarrassment, as the mission was foiled by a mere passer-by, the NYPD had to ask the FBI to return their surveillance materials and faced uproar from human rights groups, who sued to shut down the anti-constitutional domestic surveillance program. Fears were voiced of a repeat of the NYPD abuses of the 1950s, when police ‘Red Squads’ spied on student groups and activists in search of communists.

Two questions still stand out: why would the NYPD act in New Jersey and do they have the right to do so?

In February, the NYPD's legal matters commission responded to the latter question. The legal team said that officers can operate outside New York if they are not conducting official police duties. So, detectives gathering information get the green light.

New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has also defended the NYPD's right to go anywhere in the country in search of terrorists without telling local police. So, according to media reports, the department’s Special Services Unit appears to operate not only in New Jersey, but also in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and other states.

After the September 11 terrorist attacks, the New York Police Department embarked on a mission to preclude any repeat of the tragedy, which resulted in monitoring Muslims’ activities in New York – and far beyond.

The scandal in New Brunswick did not contravene NYPD’s practice, says the Associated Press, so targeting minorities without firm evidence of wrongdoing and spying on their own citizens continued. Many note that with the NYPD’s ambitions and methods currently outdoing the FBI and CIA, the organization is growing into a formidable domestic surveillance force.

Comments (25)

davee (unregistered) 27.07.2012 09:15

muslims did not commit the 911. 911 was created by the cia/mossad. why you might ask?? because america democracy only works if its constantly have enemies and wars. without enemies and wars american democracy will not last an hour. so they (cia and mossad) used the wahabies from al saud(saudi arabia)  family (they are not muslim,eventhough to claim to be muslim) to get trained by the cia and highjack the planes and crash them on the towers. they easily got a lot of countries to go to an illegal war with iraq, looting their museums, oil and god know what else and built a 20,000 personal embasy. 911 also gave them a reason to invade afghaniston looted thier natural resouces and will have a permenant base there. so who benefited most here?? only the usa and isreal did. now they are going after syria and iran. if they succeed in syran then iran is next, and if they succeed in iran, guess what?? yes, you are right, only china and russia are left.... they will make china into 39 small countaries and russia will be torn into small little countaries too. its a loose loose for muslims, china, and russia. putin the ball is in courty

0

Undo

jujubes (unregistered) 26.07.2012 15:18

In the final paragraph, it states, "...so targeting minorities without firm evidence of wrongdoing...", implies that until wrongdoing occurs, authorities have no right investigating or conducting surveillance to ensure that nothing suspicious or criminal is in the works. I'm confused. Isn't the goal to prevent wrongdoing??? Here's what I cannot comprehend. The US government and FBI were highly criticized for having received intelligence re 911 in advance and having not acted on it. In order to do so, it would have required minority profiling, unfortunately. Here's my thought, if you're leading a somewhat uneventful, routine life and in general, you're a law-abiding citizen, then there's nothing to worry about. Authorities will move on. If you're not, then as one of those previously mentioned citizens, I would prefer that you are targeted and spied upon!

0

Undo

Karl (unregistered) 26.07.2012 15:01

As with anything, Islam is a belief system that individuals will mutilate to suit their own ends. This does not make it reasonable to say that Islam is evil or dangerous. It is a beautiful religion, with a long and proud history in virtually all of society's great pursuits - art, philosophy, science, architecture, everything. Islam is not the enemy. Nor is any particular religious affiliation, race, nation, what have you. These are all red herrings. Banks and oil companies are the enemy. Neo-liberalism is the enemy. And it's become increasingly efficient in its efforts to project countless misguided individuals' sense of disenfranchisement and injustice away from the real obstacles and dangers facing society today, and onto the "terrorist," or "extremist".

+1

Undo

View all comments (25)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us