Rand Paul blasts GOP: 'We’re in danger of becoming a dinosaur'

Published time: November 28, 2012 16:04
Edited time: November 28, 2012 20:04
U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). (AFP Photo / Mark Wilson)

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) may quickly be making a name for himself within the Republican Party, but the libertarian-leaning lawmaker warns that the GOP isn’t quite so grand anymore.

Speaking to CNN this week, the junior senator said the United States needs a “new type of Republican” that will be able to keep up with the pace of the rest of the nation.

“I think my party, the Republican Party, is shrinking,” he said. “We’re in danger of becoming a dinosaur.”

In an interview earlier this month with ABC News, Sen. Paul said, "I'm not going to deny that I'm interested” in running for president in 2016. His father, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), ran unsuccessfully several times in the past, but although Sen. Paul has failed to divulge much more about any potential plans for an Oval Office bid, this week he did spend a moment to say he hasn’t exactly changed his mind just yet.

“Well, what I have said is I won’t deny that I’m interested, a little bit different from I’m interested,” Sen. Paul said. “I want to be part of the national debate.”

According to Sen. Paul, the GOP has been weakening in recent years because it can neither sell itself in areas where it needs to nor make an impression on a large chunk of the US population that sees no point in voting Republican.

“We’re not competitive in huge areas of the country. Some of the biggest states: California, New York Illinois, we’re not competing anymore, in fact, we don’t even advertise there,” Sen. Paul told CNN. “So, we need a new type of Republican. I think that involves some of the ideas of Libertarian-leaning Republicans; people who believe in a less aggressive foreign policy; people who believe that we’re not gonna deport 12 million Hispanic folks.”

In his previous interview, the senator said, "I think we have to go a different direction because we're just not winning and we have to think about some different ideas.” In order for the Republican Party to pull in some more members, he suggests the rest of the GOP rethink their stances on drug laws, immigration and defense spending.

"Republicans who think military spending, myself, who think national defense is important, should compromise and say, you know what, not every dollar spent on the military's sacred, we can reduce the military spending, that's a compromise. Democrats should compromise also – entitlements and welfare, the spending can come,” he told ABC. Catching up this week, he added, "The way I look at it is entitlements are broken, and it's not my fault, it's not Democrats' fault, it's because your grandparents had too many babies. It's because we're living longer. These are just facts.”

Comments (18)

hrdman2luv 29.11.2012 20:55

Rand Paul didn't support Romney for his idea's, policies or anything else. The only reason Rand gave Romney his endorsement, was to have a speaking roll at the RNC convention. That's it. Nothing more. Nothing less. The GOP lied, cheated and stoled delegates from this fathers (Ron Paul's) campaign. So, Rand cheated the cheater. (sort of speak).. It's not like his endorsement was a vote. Endorsements are meaningless. What did mean a lot to Rand, was to be on the RNC stage. That made his father proud. Regardless of how he got there.

0

Undo

hrdman2luv 29.11.2012 20:35

SNAFU (unregistered) wrote in #4
Only three words needed, he supported Romney. Romney was nothing but another version of Bush. That says it all about this guy. If the GOP thinks they are going to put another Bush hack in the White House, dream on.
If you think Rand is another bush, then I'd advise you to do some research on Rand Paul before you vote for anyone.  He shares many of the same values of NOT the current group of Republicans, but of the Republicans that once were actual conservatives.  The current crop, I agree, are not actually conservative at all.  And have turned to the Libertarian Party because of the current crop. But, Rand Paul is not like them at all. Research him thoroughly before you decide.

0

Undo

JosefC 29.11.2012 17:53

Hard to take in what this fellow says. He previously advocated for HIS new version of freedom--freedom for restaurant owners to bar blacks--in other words, Old Racism, pure and simple. How much did apartheid cost the US in the 60's and before?  

0

Undo

View all comments (18)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us