Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Supreme Court is ill-equipped to judge NSA surveillance programs - Scalia

26.09.2013 03:28

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said Wednesday the court eventually will have to determine the legality of far-reaching National Security Agency spying programs, though he is not convinced the court is equipped to based on modern security threats.

View full story

Comments (12) Sort by: Highest rating Oldest first Newest first

 

Citizen 13.11.2013 18:15

So the oldest supreme court member doesn't understand the concept of checks and balances? This is exactly the situation the supreme court is for. The Constitution is the supreme law, and it was always only a matter of time until our representitives try to violate it in order to make their own jobs easier in ways that do not benefit the average citizen.

 

Tyrant 27.09.2013 00:22

The Supreme Court is ill-equipped to do anything except sell laws to corporate interests and decompose.

 

RYBY 26.09.2013 23:49

I want all of you reading this to look at the photo in this article. Look at the symbol he is making with his hand.

Next time you watch ANYTHING, count how many times you see this gesture made by anyone.

We all need to understand where the corruption starts!!!!

 

JailBanksters 26.09.2013 23:32

Really
Just read the Constitution, then read what the NSA is doing. The NSA only exists in the first place because the Laws in Place to prevent a NSA were broken, and then created other Laws to protect it's existance. Surprisingly, this is exactly how the Federal Reserve came into being.

 

Noah Way 26.09.2013 23:12

It is Scalia who is ill-equipped to judge NSA surveillance programs, or anything else.

 

britannica 26.09.2013 17:58

Scalia is a Bilderberg, Globalizing, corrupt and soulless monster.

Hi s biased comments here -- the assumption that there are actual threats that warrant some form of NSA spying -- should be sufficient for him to recuse himself from the SCOTUS.

 

Joseph Drawns 26.09.2013 14:26

I read so many articles, and I want to comment all the time, however this is the first article that I feel the need to comment on. What does it matter what the court knows or understands about any form of threat, be it from terrorists or aliens, isn't the point of the court something that they should be experts or not. And the point being whether it is CONSTITUTIONAL or not.

 

Michael Gray 26.09.2013 14:17

Pantera Persa 26.09.2013 08:27



You know, I believe he is..

  


Brilliant observation by the both of you..... but your power of observation is lacking..... If he stood on his head he would be making a number 9!

 

groingo 26.09.2013 14:08

The answer is simple....NO NSA SNOOPING!

 

Maxime Lamot 26.09.2013 10:02

I don't disagree with the article, but I think it lacks of sources.

 

Pantera Persa 26.09.2013 08:27

Pyrrho San Pellegrino 26.09.2013 06:19

Is he making the number six with his hand?

  


You know, I believe he is..

 

Zeitgeisttt 26.09.2013 05:33

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scaliais a shill for the Bilderberg Group...

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us