Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Two pro-immigrant rulings made by Supreme Court

Published time: March 03, 2014 20:27
Edited time: March 03, 2014 23:38
The U.S. Supreme Court.(AFP Photo / Win McNamee)

The U.S. Supreme Court.(AFP Photo / Win McNamee)

The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to review decisions against local Pennsylvania and Texas laws targeting illegal immigrants, leaving intact rulings that declared the efforts unconstitutional.

In question were immigration laws passed by the cities of Hazleton, Pennsylvania, and Farmers Branch, Texas, which were intended to regulate local housing rentals among illegal immigrants.

Specifically, Reuters reported that the ordinances “required tenants to provide identification that could later be verified with immigration authorities and penalized landlords from renting to illegal immigrants.” If a tenant was found without a license, he/she faced fines as well as arrest.

Additionally, the Hazleton law penalized businesses if they were found to be knowingly employing undocumented workers.

Both of these laws were declared unconstitutional by lower courts, which reiterated that immigration remains an issue to be handled by the federal government. These rulings have now been solidified by the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the cities’ arguments for appeal.

The decision remains in line with previous statements by the Supreme Court, which has also found immigration to be a federal issue. Those who supported the ordinances, however, argued that lack of action on the national level forced local governments to make their own rules.

Pro-immigration advocates in Texas greeted the news with approval, according to the Dallas Morning News. One of the groups suing Farmers Branch told the newspaper that the issue should now be put to bed.

“The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected the city’s final appeal,” said Nina Perales of the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund.

“After more than 7 years of litigation, during which the city lost at every stage, it is time for Farmers Branch to let go of its immigration ordinance. Today’s ruling is a strong message that local immigration laws are unconstitutional and hurt cities because they waste precious resources and undermine community relationships.”

While these two laws were struck down, immigration watchers are still waiting to see how the Supreme Court will react to an appeals request concerning a similar law in Fremont, Nebraska. Supporters of that ordinance successfully argued in lower courts that it was permissible because it did not target immigrants themselves, just those businesses which employed them.

“I guess if we are in Nebraska, we can do it, and if we are in Texas, we can’t,” Farmers Branch Mayor Bill Glancy told the Morning News.

Previously, the Supreme Court has upheld laws penalizing employers who hire illegal immigrants. Both Hazleton and Farmers Branch argued it was within their right to regulate undocumented immigrants and employers, but opponents said the ordinances went too far.

In a statement responding to the decision, attorney Bill Brewer said, “Our hope is that the city will close this unfortunate chapter in its history and begin to embrace the changing demographics of the community – as part of a more inclusive and dynamic future.”

Comments (5)

 

Roan Garcia-Quintana 05.03.2014 06:32

One way to get around this is ask EVERYONE to whom you rent for their credit report, which would require them to give you a matching SSN and name. You will get rid of most illegals and other deadbeats this way. It works, it's legal, and it keeps these cockroaches illegal aliens away from your property.

 

Harvey Douthit 04.03.2014 01:43

America is a republic which bases is law. The supreme law of the land says illegal is not illegal,, The republic is dead,, Throw the constitution out our leaders have.. Guess the dictionary will have to change the definition, I am sure some lawyer can come up with a new meaning.. Hire Clinton he would be a natural at it

 

Robert Olson 03.03.2014 22:11

Texas needs to leave america to save its self from too many welfare collectors.. they have the right.. they are a country acting as a state...

View all comments (5)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us