Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

'US will strike Iran in early 2013' - former American ambassador to Israel

Published time: September 17, 2012 18:42
Edited time: September 23, 2012 23:36
Martin Indyk (AFP Photo / Karim Jaafar)

Martin Indyk (AFP Photo / Karim Jaafar)

The former US Ambassador to Israel predicts that war with Iran is likely to occur in early 2013.

Martin Indyk, the former Ambassador, said there may be about six months left to negotiate a solution that would avoid war – but he thinks this is unlikely. Joining a roundtable of foreign policy experts to discuss the latest Middle East protests and Israel’s concern over Iran, Indyk’s predictions were dire.

“There is still time, perhaps six months, even by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s own time table to try to see if a negotiated solution can be worked out,” he said on CBS’s ‘Face the Nation’ on Sunday. “I’m pessimistic about that. If that doesn’t work out – and we need to make every effort, exhaust every chance that it does work – then I am afraid that 2013 is going to be a year in which we’re going to have a military confrontation with Iran.”

While Indyk said that Iran does not have nuclear weapons at this point, it is only a matter of time before the US will need to take military action.

Israel continues to put pressure on the US to take greater actions against Iran. This past week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly scolded the Obama administration for their refusal to draw a “red line” on Iran’s nuclear program. In his mind, if this red line were to be drawn, Iran would be prohibited from crossing it, or else face a response from the US military. Indyk said Israel’s request for this line is “unreasonable” and something that neither Governor Romney, nor Senator McCain are supporting.

But Indyk said that even though the US would not declare a red line, the US and Israel see eye to eye on most issues regarding Iran.

“While there’s still time, there is not a lot of time, and I don’t think the difference between Netanyahu and Obama on this is that great in terms of the President’s commitment not to allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons,” he said.

During the CBS roundtable discussion, Richard Haas, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, said tensions with the Middle East are so high that it takes little to start a conflict. The anti-Muslim film that ignited protests throughout the Arab world was not a major factor, but simply a spark that released already-existing tensions.

“This is the equivalent of a forest fire. Anything could set it off, so the film is the wrong place to focus,” he said.

And while the Arab world continues to display anti-American sentiment and Israel continues to pressure the US to increase tensions with Iran, only time will tell if Indyk’s war prediction will come as soon as early 2013.

Comments (3)

Anonymous user 10.06.2013 20:04

Americans and lies: is it yet to be early 2013? lol Just like the Iraq story. Robery and lies = USA

 

Michael W Gooch 13.03.2013 20:11

No negotiations are needed.

Fou nd this statement by Michael F Rivero on another site a while back

"There is no Iranian nuclear problem. Everything Iran is doing is authorized by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which both the United States and Iran have signed....Let us be clear; there is no Iranian nuclear threat. The threat is Iran's oil, sold for currencies other than the dollar, and Iran as a political uniting force in the Mideast, which Israel will not accept..."

Anonymous user 08.03.2013 00:26

what the heck this crazy

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us